Good Samaritan Society Canton
Save
1022 North Dakota Avenue, Canton, SD 57013
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
The narratives surrounding this facility reveal a striking and troubling range of experiences, with some residents and families reporting genuine moments of care and kindness, while others describe startling lapses in basic standards that left them distressed, angry, and searching for answers. The accounts together form a picture of inconsistent care, where what one person praises as a positive environment can be sharply undercut by another family's terrifying and painful experiences. In one voice, a mother who received physical therapy and enjoyed the people and the routine there is described as thriving in a setting that seemed to offer warmth, good meals, and a sense of community. Yet in another voice, a granddaughter and a family member recount a series of alarming failures that culminated in tragedy, painting a far more troubling portrait of the same place.
Among the most pointed condemnations is a blunt and furious verdict about the staff: "Pathetic and disgusting staff." The reviewer blasts the personnel as a whole, expressing that the treatment of nurses and other workers was so deplorable that it warrants a stark condemnation. This same account also acknowledges the visible effort of certain roles - housekeepers - arguing they "deserve much better praise," which underscores the complexity of the facility's morale: while some workers may be appreciated by some residents' families, others feel the core team is failing in crucial ways. It's a portrait of division within the ranks, leaving families unsure which experience their loved ones will receive on any given day.
In a different thread of experience, a family member recalls a very different kindness: their mother "did PT there and truly enjoyed the staff, residents, food and everything they offered her." This positive note highlights that the facility can deliver moments of meaningful care and engagement, where physical therapy and social interaction contribute to a sense of well-being. The reviewer notes that their relative is now home and that they remain grateful for the "wonderful experience she had." The sentiment is not that care is uniformly disastrous, but that it can be, depending on whom you encounter and what day you're there - an important distinction that complicates any simple judgment about the place.
However, the more devastating and graphic allegations come from another family, who describe a grandmother's rapid and degrading decline within the same system. According to their account, the facility failed to provide essential care in several critical areas: "no wound care, no dental hygiene assistance," and a distressing claim that staff refused to provide a straw, leading to severe dehydration. They also assert that the staff "restricted her diet without consulting her doctor," a practice that raises serious questions about clinical governance and patient autonomy. The family's decision to pull her out of the facility coincided with that same night's death, which they say came after a period of suffering, and they place blame at the doorstep of the Good Sam facility. The language used is painful and urgent: they describe the patient being placed in "a back room to die alone," a detail that intensifies the fear and anger of those who read it and who worry about how vulnerable people are treated in end-of-life moments.
The criticisms extend beyond patient care to questions of leadership and policy at the facility. The reviewer who targets management accuses them of "more than poor" leadership, arguing that the facility relies on external staffing companies to replace local, long-time caregivers who are described as genuinely caring for residents. The charge is that a run-down, inconsistent quality of care is masked by the hiring of temporary or external help only when audits are imminent: "they know when state will be in so they can clean up all the problems that linger through the facility between state inspections." That language suggests a pattern where superficial compliance can eclipse sustained, day-to-day quality, leaving families wary about the true standards of care when inspectors are not present.
The tone of critique crescendos into a stark, uncompromising conclusion about trust and the overall value of the facility. One strong statement asserts, "Wouldn't trust this place to take care of my dog while I'm on vacation let alone put a loved one in their ?care'." The hyperbolic comparison to pet care underscores the depth of the reviewer's disillusionment: if basic animal care is regarded as more reliable than human elder care, a facility's core mission is called into question. Taken with the other accounts, this line reflects a fear that the most vulnerable residents are not guaranteed the essential protections, respect, or dignified treatment they deserve.
Together, the mixed experiences - some instances of warmth, engagement, and appreciation for dedicated staff, alongside deeply troubling reports of neglect, dehydration, restricted diets, and emotionally devastating end-of-life handling - paint a complex and emotionally charged picture. Families who have witnessed the positive moments speak to the possibility that good care can happen within these walls, even as others argue that systemic issues, management decisions, and inconsistent staffing undermine the safety and dignity of residents. The tension between these narratives invites a careful, independent examination of the facility's practices, culture, and accountability mechanisms.
For families considering care for a loved one, these reviews emphasize the need for diligence, questions, and a tangible plan for oversight. They suggest looking beyond surface impressions and last-visit interactions to probe wound care protocols, dental hygiene support, hydration strategies, dietary decisions, and the transparency of decision-making when procedures or restrictions are put in place. They also highlight the importance of understanding staffing stability, the use of external agencies, and how the facility communicates during and between state inspections. In the end, the stories are a reminder that care homes can offer genuine compassion and skilled attention, but they can also falter in ways that profoundly affect trust, safety, and the patient's dignity.
Good Samaritan Society Canton is an assisted living community located in Canton, SD. This well-appointed community offers a range of amenities to ensure the comfort and well-being of its residents.
Residents can enjoy visits to the on-site beauty salon or relax in their fully furnished private rooms, equipped with cable or satellite TV. The community also offers community-operated transportation for convenience and ease of travel.
For those looking to stay connected, there is a computer center with Wi-Fi/high-speed internet access available. Meals are provided in a restaurant-style dining room, offering a variety of options to accommodate special dietary restrictions.
There are also several recreational spaces available for use, including a fitness room, gaming room, small library, and outdoor garden area. Planned daily activities and resident-run activities ensure that there is always something engaging and enjoyable happening within the community.
The care services at Good Samaritan Society Canton are designed to provide assistance with activities of daily living as needed. This includes assistance with bathing, dressing, transfers, and medication management. The 24-hour call system and supervision provide peace of mind for residents and their families.
There are also transportation arrangements available for non-medical purposes as well as transportation to doctors' appointments. The wellness center offers programs focused on mental wellness, while the staff ensures that all meals adhere to diabetes diets and special dietary restrictions.
Good Samaritan Society Canton is conveniently located near cafes, pharmacies, restaurants, places of worship, and hospitals for easy access to additional amenities and services in the surrounding area.
Overall, this assisted living community provides a comfortable and welcoming environment where residents can receive personalized care while enjoying a range of amenities and activities designed to enhance their quality of life.
This part of Canton, South Dakota offers a peaceful and welcoming community with various amenities suitable for senior living. The proximity to several places of worship such as Canton Lutheran Church and Trinity Lutheran Church provides opportunities for spiritual fulfillment. Access to pharmacies like Lewis Family Drug and healthcare facilities such as Canton Inwood Memorial Hospital ensures easy access to medical services. Nearby parks like Newton Hills State Park and Good Earth State Park at Blood Run offer scenic spots for outdoor activities and relaxation. Additionally, cafes like Laura's Lattes and restaurants such as Subway cater to dining needs. Overall, this area provides a comfortable and convenient environment for seniors looking to settle in a close-knit community.
Good Samaritan Society Canton is located at 1022 North Dakota Avenue, Canton, SD 57013 in Lincoln County, South Dakota
Fellowship Village of W Lyon
Inwood, IA
Specialized diabetic care with social amenities in an assisted-living setting.
Fellowship Village of W Lyon reviews
Fellowship Village of W Lyon images
Avera Prince Of Peace Retirement Community - Oakwood
Sioux Falls, SD
Small, intimate community with 24-hour supervision and comprehensive care services.
Avera Prince Of Peace Retirement Community - Oakwood reviews
Meadows on Sycamore Inc
Sioux Falls, SD
Clean, spacious environment with caring staff and active social spaces.
Meadows on Sycamore Inc costs
Meadows on Sycamore Inc reviews
Meadows on Sycamore Inc images
Touchmark At All Saints
Sioux Falls, SD
Vibrant activities and excellent dining in a welcoming, hotel-like setting.
Touchmark At All Saints reviews
Touchmark At All Saints images
Dow Rummel Village
Sioux Falls, SD
Caring staff, clean, home-like environment with extensive activities and flexible care options.
Dow Rummel Village costs
Dow Rummel Village reviews
Dow Rummel Village images
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Assisted living provides moderate support for seniors seeking independence, while memory care offers specialized support for individuals with dementia or cognitive impairments through structured routines and trained staff. Key differences include care approaches, environment security measures, staff training levels, activity types, and cost considerations.
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Assisted living communities offer diverse activities beyond traditional games to enhance seniors' physical health, cognitive well-being, emotional enrichment, and social connections, including fitness classes, creative expression, and intergenerational interactions. These enriching programs foster community bonds and support residents' independence and happiness.
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
The article differentiates between assisted living and memory care, explaining that assisted living supports seniors with daily activities while promoting independence, whereas memory care provides specialized services for individuals with dementia, focusing on secure environments and cognitive support. It also addresses staff training, safety considerations, costs, family involvement, and transition strategies for families navigating these care options.