Gloucester Shady Lane Home

Pros

• They do wonderful entertainment.
• Regina in activities is great.
• It is a nice place to work.

Cons

• The resident was left lying in her own urine for an unknown duration.
• The resident was left sitting on the toilet for several minutes after the nurse took a break and there was no coverage.
• After the emergency switch was pulled, no staff responded until someone intervened.
• The resident, who lacks teeth, was given food she could not eat.
• The reviewer would not trust the facility to watch a dog.
• The staff were described as shady, and they allegedly got angry when asked to leave early and sent the reviewer home.
• The reviewer claimed that clients complain and that staff try to overwork employees.

Review

A cluster of reviews paints a picture of a care facility that inspires strong feelings, some of them scathing and others more hopeful. Taken together, the comments show a community with highly divergent experiences - perhaps reflective of uneven care standards, shifting staffing, and pockets of genuine warmth amid deeper concerns. The most striking accounts are the ones that describe neglect or poor treatment, while other remarks celebrate certain staff members and moments of joy within the facility.

One reviewer recounts a deeply troubling scene involving a friend who was living there. The account describes the friend laying in her own urine for an extended period, with uncertainty about how long this had been happening. The narrator also notes that the resident was left sitting on the toilet for several minutes after a nurse decided to take a break and did not secure coverage for the resident. According to this account, the emergency mechanism was tested multiple times - an emergency switch was pulled, but nobody responded until the reviewer spoke up. Beyond the immediate physical concerns, the reviewer mentions that the resident, who does not have teeth, was given food that she could not eat, adding a troubling layer about appropriate nourishment and dignity. The review closes with a strong personal stance: the author would not trust this place to watch a pet, which underscores a broader distrust in the facility's ability to provide safe, respectful care.

Another reviewer adds a blunt firsthand experience about the administrative side of the operation. This person claims they were treated poorly for trying to leave early. They describe an abrupt, negative reaction from the staff, who allegedly became angry, sent them home, and asserted that clients complain about staff overworking themselves. In short, this account points to tensions between residents or their families and management, suggesting a culture in which requests or needs were met with denial or punitive responses rather than flexible, resident-centered solutions.

Interspersed with these negative stories are mentions of positive features within the same environment. One reviewer notes that the facility offers wonderful entertainment, and singles out Regina in the activities department as a standout. This speaks to a programmed aspect of the facility that can be a bright spot in residents' days, highlighting that meaningful activities and engaging staff make a tangible difference in quality of life.

There is also a simple, affirmative sentiment from another reviewer who describes the place as nice to work at. This remark suggests that, for staff, the environment can be a positive workplace with perhaps good colleagues or favorable conditions, at least in some departments or shifts. The contrast with the earlier, harsher critiques hints at a complex internal dynamic where some roles or times of day yield rewarding experiences, while others are associated with serious concerns about resident welfare and supervisory practices.

A later reflection adds a layer of nostalgia and personal connection to the facility's history. The reviewer states that their father used to run the place, naming Joseph Varelli, and recalls loving it as a child, mentioning the memory of being "baby New Year." This piece provides a legacy angle, implying that the place has been part of the community for a long time and carries emotional weight for families who have long-standing ties. The tone here is fond and wistful, contrasting with the sharper, more critical accounts.

Taken as a whole, these reviews sketch a facility that elicits both affection and alarm. There are clearly moments of positive interaction - engaging activities led by dedicated staff, and a work environment that some people find rewarding. Yet there are equally loud warnings about neglect, delays in care, and questionable responses to residents' needs, including nutrition and safety concerns. The mix of praise for particular staff members and criticisms of systemic issues suggests that the experience may vary dramatically depending on who is providing care, when it is provided, and under what supervisory or policy constraints.

For readers trying to form a sense of the place, the threads of praise and concern can be seen as two sides of a broader narrative about elder care: the human dignity at the heart of caregiving can shine through in cheerful activity coordinators and compassionate coworkers, while gaps in supervision, staffing consistency, and timely responsiveness can lead to distressing situations for residents and families. The personal memories attached to the facility's history add another layer, reminding us that such institutions are more than just buildings; they are communities with long-standing ties, reputations built over decades, and the potential to touch lives in meaningful ways - for better or for worse.

This part of Clarksboro, New Jersey, offers a convenient location with a variety of amenities nearby. Within a few miles, you will find pharmacies, transportation options including the Philadelphia International Airport, reputable physicians, diverse dining options such as McDonald's and Chick-Fil-A, as well as several parks for outdoor activities. Additionally, there are cafes like Starbucks for leisurely moments and hospitals in close proximity for any medical needs. The area provides easy access to essential services and recreational opportunities that can cater to your lifestyle preferences as a senior resident.

Pharmacies

• Rite Aid (2.3 miles)
• Walgreens (3.7 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (3.7 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (4.9 miles)
• Walgreens (5.9 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (6 miles)
• Rite Aid (6 miles)

Transportation

• Taxiway N (3.1 miles)
• Terminal C (4 miles)
• Philadelphia International Airport (PHL) (4 miles)
• The Centurion Lounge (4 miles)
• Terminal A West (4 miles)
• Philadelphia International Airport, Terminal A - East (4 miles)
• American Airlines Admirals Club (4 miles)

Physicians

• Orthopedic Surgery & Sports Medicine (3.7 miles)
• Advocare West Deptford Pediatrics (3.8 miles)
• CHOP Buerger Center for Advanced Pediatric Care - Raymond G. Perelman Campus (9.2 miles)
• Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (9.3 miles)
• Dr Madonna's Family Practice (9.5 miles)

Restaurants

• McDonald's (4 miles)
• McDonald's (4.9 miles)
• Wendy's (5.9 miles)
• McDonald's (5.9 miles)
• Cracker Barrel (6.3 miles)
• Chick-Fil-A (6.8 miles)
• Maglio Bros (7.2 miles)

Parks

• FDR Park (6.8 miles)
• Christopher Columbus Park Dog Run (8.8 miles)
• Washington Lake Park (9.1 miles)
• Ellson Glen Park (9.3 miles)
• Market Square Memorial Park (9.3 miles)
• Weccacoe Park (9.5 miles)
• Schuylkill River Park (9.5 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (7.8 miles)
• 320 Market Cafe (8 miles)

Hospitals

• Veterans Administration Community Living Center (9.1 miles)
• Philadelphia VA Medical Center (9.2 miles)
• The Pavilion (9.3 miles)