Mullica Gardens Assisted Living Costs & Pricing
Mullica Gardens Assisted Living offers competitive pricing in comparison to both Gloucester County and the broader New Jersey market. For a studio room, the monthly cost at Mullica Gardens is $5,520, which is higher than the county average of $4,309 but remains relatively close to the state median of $5,286. When considering a one-bedroom unit, residents can expect to pay $5,790 per month - slightly above Gloucester County's average of $4,831 while also being within reach of New Jersey's statewide average of $5,994. This pricing reflects the quality and range of services provided at Mullica Gardens, emphasizing its commitment to delivering exceptional care tailored to individual needs amidst fluctuating regional costs.
| Floor plans | Mullica Gardens Assisted Living | Gloucester County | New Jersey |
|---|
| Studio | $5,520 | $4,309 | $5,286 |
| 1 Bedroom | $5,790 | $4,831 | $5,994 |
Skilled Nursing Facilities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$601 / mo
Gilpin Hall
$4,919 to $6,394 / month
18.2 miles away
-
from -$370 / mo
Cambridge Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center
$5,150 to $7,550 / month
21.9 miles away
-
from -$570 / mo
Lodge Lane Assisted Living
$4,950 to $7,380 / month
14.9 miles away
-
from -$1020 / mo
CareOne at Evesham Assisted Living
$4,500 to $7,300 / month
21.0 miles away
-
from +$480 / mo
Accela Rehab and Care Center at Springfield
$6,000 / month
24.6 miles away
Overall Review of Mullica Gardens Assisted Living
common
22 reviews mention this
Staff care is a consistent theme
Residents and families consistently describe staff as kind, respectful, and responsive during visits and transitions.
Many reviews highlight staff members who treat residents with kindness and dignity, and who feel easy to approach during day-to-day interactions. Families also describe good support during move-in and transitions, with frequent mentions that concerns are heard. A smaller set of reviews raises problems with staffing capacity and follow-up on communication, which is where expectations appear to fall short.
common
14 reviews mention this
Cleanliness and upkeep stand out
Multiple residents and families call out a consistently clean, well-maintained facility.
Across reviews, the building cleanliness shows up as a key pointâpeople mention the facility looks clean, well maintained, and free of unpleasant conditions when they visit. Some also describe the community as newer or recently updated, reinforcing the impression that the environment is kept up. Even among the more critical reviews, the recurring focus tends to land elsewhere, while cleanliness is still often described positively.
caveat
15 reviews mention this
Dining is praised, but criticized too
Dining gets strong praise for quality from many residents, but other families report issues with variety and meal quality.
Several reviews say meals taste good, vary, and include options, with some people specifically enjoying dining room time and the staff effort around food. Other reviews paint a different picture, describing meals as lacking balance and fresh items, with complaints about vegetables, fruit, and similar basics. There are also mentions of special diets not being provided as expected and communication not being answered when food concerns come up.
common
12 reviews mention this
Activities feel engaging to many
Residents and families often describe regular activities that keep people engaged throughout the day.
Many reviews mention a steady schedule of activities, including games, crafts, music, and scheduled outings or community events. Some families say residents seem happier and more social as a result. A few reviews, however, report limited variety, repetition, or even gaps in programming for stretches of timeâespecially when they also mention communication breakdowns.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Staffing and communication can fall short
A recurring concern is that understaffing and missed communication can affect residentsâ day-to-day safety and care follow-through.
While some reviews describe proactive nursing and a well-organized team, multiple others point to understaffing and difficulty getting issues addressed. Several families mention not getting replies to calls or emails, and one review links the concern to resident health and safety. Others describe miscommunication across departments and concerns about how that impacts care and charges.
differentiator
2 reviews mention this
Memory care suites and therapies
Families describe memory care as having spacious suites and referenced therapy support.
Two reviews specifically discuss memory care, mentioning that the suites feel spacious. Both reviews also reference therapy support in that memory care context, alongside descriptions of caring aides and nurses. Other reviews mention dementia-focused handling and adjustments, but memory care-specific details are most clearly called out in these two accounts.
caveat
5 reviews mention this
Costs feel high to some
Several families question value because the pricing feels high compared with the care and meal experience they received.
Pricing is a direct concern in multiple reviews, including one that cites monthly costs and ties dissatisfaction to meals and responsiveness. Others question value for the cost or raise that missed communication and service issues add up over time. The overall pattern is that many families recommend the community, but cost/value concerns concentrate among the more critical experiences.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.