1813 Betty Lane, Las Vegas, NV 89156
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Gaye Haven Intermediate Care Facility
Pros
They are down to earth and helping people.
The people at CS are family.
Clean Shot is run by people who are caring, dedicated, passionate, and willing to give someone a second chance.
They truly care and work hard to make a difference.
The dedication put into serving others is amazing to see.
Cleanshot is doing a remarkable job at helping people recover from alcohol and drug addiction and assisting men and women to recreate their lives.
Clean Shot Living has been a staple in the community providing wrap-around services for individuals in recovery.
Their staff show passion and pride in the services they provide.
There is a divine anointing in the hands of the staff.
This is a welcoming, dedicated facility that wants to see people do better in life.
Review
This community is best suited for adults who want a recovery-first living environment built on real-world accountability, not for families seeking traditional elder care with medical oversight. The reviews portray a sober-living atmosphere where staff are deeply invested in residents’ progress, and where the culture feels like a supportive, extended family. It works best for individuals who are ready to commit to a program, particularly those who are or may become court-mordered to recovery services, and who need structure, peer support, and ongoing encouragement to stay sober and reset their lives. In short: it’s a sanctuary for sustained sobriety, not a substitute for skilled nursing or dementia care.
Those considering alternatives should look first at traditional assisted living or memory care options if medical supervision and 24/7 nursing support are priorities. The material indicates a recovery-oriented program rather than a medical model, so residents with significant health needs, complex medication regimens requiring nursing administration, or advanced cognitive impairment may need a setting designed for ongoing clinical oversight. Additionally, if a neutral, non-spiritual environment is essential, or if residents are not prepared to engage with a peer-driven recovery program, other arrangements may be more appropriate. This is not the right fit for every senior or every level of care need.
The core strengths are compelling. Staff appear consistently described as caring, devoted, and genuinely invested in each person’s transformation, creating a home-like atmosphere that many residents measure as the pivotal benefit of their life change. The sense of community is palpable, people are described as family, and the willingness to rally around someone in trouble or celebrate a milestone is repeatedly highlighted. The program’s wrap-around services, plus the visible commitment of leadership and experienced mentors, provide a robust treadmill for accountability: regular check-ins, structured routines, and a community that expects participants to do the work necessary for sobriety. This combination often translates into meaningful, long-term life improvement for residents who lean in.
Yet the program’s recovery orientation inevitably carries some trade-offs. The most salient con is the absence of explicit medical oversight in the reviews; residents who require consistent nursing care, emergency response, or complex health management may not find sufficient coverage here. There is also an implied emphasis on embracing a recovery path that includes program participation and personal accountability, elements that may feel restrictive to those seeking maximum personal autonomy or a more low-key living environment. The spiritual language and emphasis found in some testimonials can be a strength for many, but it may not align with every resident’s beliefs, comfort level, or desire for a secular setting.
When weighing pros against cons, the balance clearly tilts toward stability, belonging, and durable sobriety for those who are ready to invest in a recovery-forward lifestyle. The genuine care, the “like family” culture, and the relentless focus on helping residents rebuild a productive life tend to mitigate the lack of medical supervision for those who do not require intensive clinical care. For individuals who arrive needing emotional and social support to reestablish independence, the positives, consistency, accountability, and a supportive peer network, offer a powerful antidote to relapse risk. The environment compensates for medical gaps with moral support, practical accountability, and a shared commitment to recovery.
For families evaluating options, a clear decision path emerges. Confirm the resident’s health status and ensure medical needs can be met in collaboration with external healthcare providers if necessary; inquire about licensing, whether the facility can accommodate any special treatments, and what medical support is available on-site or via partnerships. Discuss expectations about program participation, daily structure, and potential encumbrances on personal autonomy. Ask about cost, length of stay, and transition plans if health or recovery goals shift. If the primary objective is sustained sobriety within a compassionate, community-centered framework, this environment is a strong contender. If medical supervision, secular programming, or traditional elder-care features are non-negotiable, alternatives should be pursued with equal thoroughness.





Seniors and Modern Transportation: Exploring Uber, Lyft, and Other Ride-Hailing Options
Comprehensive Guide to Qualifying for Home Health Care Services
Powerful Realities of Elder Abuse and the Most Effective Ways to Report It