River City Living Community
Save3038 West Truman Boulevard, Jefferson City, MO 65109
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
At River City Living Community, the monthly cost for a private room is $3,814, which positions it as a more affordable option compared to both Cole County and the broader state of Missouri. In comparison, the average cost in Cole County reaches $4,622, while the state-wide average stands at $4,483. This pricing structure indicates that River City Living Community offers significant savings for residents seeking quality care without compromising on comfort or amenities. By choosing River City, individuals can enjoy a serene living environment while benefiting from economic advantages relative to nearby options.
| Floor plans | River City Living Community | Cole County | Missouri |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $3,814 | $4,622 | $4,483 |
A troubling pattern emerges across a number of accounts about a care facility that is supposed to provide short-term and rehabilitation support for people after serious medical events. The comments come from several different residents and family members who describe a consistently troubling level of care, safety concerns, and communication gaps. While one review offers a rare positive note, a large cluster of experiences shared by others paints a picture of persistent neglect, delays in essential medical care, and inadequate daily support that left loved ones vulnerable.
One sister's experience stands out for the way it framed the core issue: the patient was there for a month of short-term care after having two fingers amputated due to cellulitis and was to receive a 30-day course of antibiotics via a PICC line. The family reports that antibiotics did not start until the fourth day, despite explicit doctor's orders. They claim there was no timely delivery of medications, and night staff reportedly failed to bring a commode or respond promptly when the patient pressed the call button. The patient, who is diabetic and had significant lower-limb amputations, faced long waits for assistance with basic needs, with the call light going unanswered for an extended period. The reviewer describes a broader pattern of inadequate personal care: the patient was not given showers promptly, bed sheets were changed only after delays, and the overall level of attention was described as shockingly insufficient in a hospital-to-home transition that required close monitoring and timely treatment.
Beyond the immediate medical delays, safety concerns repeatedly surface. The same account notes that the patient fell out of a wheelchair because wheels were not locked, resulting in a bruise around the eye. The lack of a proper routine for assistance in the bathroom, combined with the absence of timely help to meet basic needs, is presented as a recurring hazard. There is also a disturbing allegation about personal belongings: the reviewer claims a wedding ring set - gifts from the patient's late husband - was not accounted for correctly and was reportedly locked away in a safe, eventually leading to the perception that items of sentimental value could be at risk of disappearance. After the month-long stay, the family returned the patient home on Christmas Day with the PICC line still in place, and the patient reportedly had to remove the line herself because staff did not provide adequate guidance or timely removal. In short, this account portrays a care environment where both day-to-day assistance and critical medical procedures were not delivered as ordered or expected.
Another vivid set of concerns centers on treatment management for chronic conditions and nutrition. The reviewer notes that breakfast was frequently late for a diabetic patient, even as insulin was administered at 8:00 a.m. - before the meal was served at around 9:00 a.m. - raising serious safety concerns about the coordination of medications and meals. The overall impression is that essential routines - feeding, hydration, and timely medication administration - were uneven at best and dangerously mishandled at times, contributing to a sense that residents were not receiving the care their conditions required.
A separate account takes the alarmingly negative tone even further by detailing what the writer describes as rampant neglect and even theft. The reviewer in South Africa claims to have been scammed out of $200 USD in connection with the facility, adding a layer of non-care-related loss that compounds the impression of unreliability and mistrust. This particular claim underscores the perception that there may be broader issues with accountability and integrity within the operation, at least in the eyes of this reviewer.
Against the chorus of severe criticism, there is at least one contrasting note: a reviewer who describes the facility as "incredible" and praises the staff, especially a person named Sara who is deemed the go-to for questions. That singular positive voice stands in stark relief to the majority of the experiences recounted, suggesting that some encounters with the facility may be markedly better than others or may depend on different shifts, managers, or individual staff members. It's a reminder that large care operations can yield highly variable experiences depending on who is on duty, when, and how aggressively families advocate for their loved ones.
Other reviews elaborate on a harsh reality: claims that the facility is hellish, where residents were reportedly not fed properly, medications were skipped, and patients were left in their own waste or neglected while staff appeared disengaged, even when emergencies arose. Descriptions include emergency call buttons being left on for long periods while staff allegedly wandered or smoked elsewhere, and a general sentiment that those entrusted with care were more focused on other tasks than on resident well-being. Some reviewers insist that the facility should not be allowed to care for people who need assistance, emphasizing a fear that vulnerable residents could be harmed due to neglect or indifference.
A further review describes a situation where a family was forced to supervise care seven days a week to ensure that their father received meals and medications, highlighting systemic gaps that required family members to compensate for staff shortcomings. The patient, who required assistance with a hoyer lift, was reportedly left in the lift for over an hour because staff chose to attend to other duties or needed to recharge equipment. The reviewer claims the facility was not trained to use the emergency release on the lift, the water cup was not refilled daily, and the patient lacked ready access to liquids. The call light button was not consistently available, and overall rehabilitation progress suffered as a result of insufficient support and communication. The overarching message in this account is that the facility's structural issues - not just episodic mistakes - were undermining the resident's health and rehabilitation potential.
Taken together, the narratives provide a stark, at times brutal, portrait of a care environment that many families and residents view as failing to meet the basic standards of medical care, safety, and dignity. The recurring threads are delays and omissions in essential medical treatment, insufficient assistance with daily activities, safety hazards (such as unrestrained movement or unaddressed fall risks), and a sense that communication between staff, residents, and families is severely lacking. The enrichment of these stories by one or two positive experiences suggests that outcomes may vary and that the quality of care can differ dramatically depending on who is present and when, but the weight of the testimonies underscores a difficult reality for those who rely on the facility for recovery and daily living.
If you or a loved one is considering care at this facility, these accounts may prompt careful, proactive planning: verify medication administration schedules and timing with the nursing team, ensure a clear plan for mobility aids and safety supports, ask about routine showers and personal hygiene, and establish a transparent process for reporting and addressing any concerns. It can also be valuable to seek a third-party review of the facility's policies and to tour the site with questions about staffing ratios, training on emergency procedures, and how patients' personal belongings are safeguarded. While there is at least one positive testimony worth noting, the strong consensus among the majority of accounts emphasizes the importance of thorough due diligence and vigilant advocacy when choosing a care setting for a loved one who requires medical attention, rehabilitation, and close daily support.
River City Living Community in Jefferson City, MO is a premier assisted living community that offers a wide range of amenities and care services to ensure the well-being and comfort of its residents.
Our community features a beauty salon to help residents look and feel their best, and cable or satellite TV for entertainment. We provide community-operated transportation for convenient mobility, as well as a computer center for staying connected with loved ones.
Residents can enjoy delicious meals in our elegant dining room, designed to replicate a restaurant-style experience. For those who prefer to cook their own meals, each living space comes fully furnished with a kitchenette. Housekeeping services are provided to maintain cleanliness and orderliness.
To promote physical fitness and overall wellness, we have a fitness room equipped with various exercise equipment. Residents can also unwind in our gaming room or spend time in the serene garden area. Our small library offers the perfect place for relaxation and reading.
At River City Living Community, we prioritize the health and safety of our residents. Our dedicated staff provides 24-hour supervision and assistance with activities of daily living such as bathing, dressing, and transfers. We offer medication management services to ensure proper adherence to prescriptions.
We cater to residents with special dietary needs including diabetes diets and other dietary restrictions. Our team prepares delicious meals that are both nutritious and enjoyable. In addition, we arrange transportation for residents' medical appointments or other outings.
Engaging activities are an integral part of life at our community. Residents can take advantage of concierge services for personalized assistance, participate in fitness programs tailored to their abilities, or join planned day trips to explore Jefferson City's attractions. Resident-run activities offer opportunities for socializing and fostering friendships within our close-knit community.
Conveniently located near several cafes, parks, pharmacies, physicians' offices, restaurants, places of worship, theaters, and hospitals – our community ensures easy access to various amenities outside the premises.
At River City Living Community, we strive to create a welcoming and vibrant environment where residents can enjoy their golden years with companionship, comfort, and peace of mind.
At River City Living Community, the monthly cost for a private room is $3,814, which positions it as a more affordable option compared to both Cole County and the broader state of Missouri. In comparison, the average cost in Cole County reaches $4,622, while the state-wide average stands at $4,483. This pricing structure indicates that River City Living Community offers significant savings for residents seeking quality care without compromising on comfort or amenities. By choosing River City, individuals can enjoy a serene living environment while benefiting from economic advantages relative to nearby options.
River City Living Community is located at 3038 West Truman Boulevard, Jefferson City, MO 65109 in Cole County, Missouri
Yes, River City Living Community allows both dogs and cats.
River City Living Community on seniors.fyi includes 14 photos including images showing interior, decor, artwork, living room, healthcare, waiting area, painting, gym, and more.
Oak Tree - ALF
Jefferson City, MO
Clean, well-maintained setting with compassionate staff and appealing dining alongside engaging activities.
Oak Tree - ALF costs
Oak Tree - ALF reviews
Oak Tree - ALF images
Westbrook Terrace & Arbors
Jefferson City, MO
Westbrook Terrace & Arbors costs
Westbrook Terrace & Arbors reviews
Westbrook Terrace & Arbors images
The Arbors at Westbrook Terrace
Jefferson City, MO
Comprehensive care (assisted living, memory care, day/respite) with 24/7 supervision and furnished, amenity-rich apartments.
The Arbors at Westbrook Terrace reviews
The Arbors at Westbrook Terrace images
Fairway Management - Jefferson City
Jefferson City, MO
Quiet, new community with established family ties nearby.
Fairway Management - Jefferson City reviews
Fairway Management - Jefferson City images
Chapel Hill Commons III
Jefferson City, MO
Friendly, accommodating staff and a welcoming community; very affordable rent.
Chapel Hill Commons III costs
Chapel Hill Commons III reviews
Chapel Hill Commons III images
Bristol Manor Of Fulton
Fulton, MO
Kind and attentive staff; reasonable pricing
Bristol Manor Of Fulton costs
Bristol Manor Of Fulton reviews
Bristol Manor Of Fulton images
The Arbors at Bluff Creek Terrace
Columbia, MO
Friendly staff and helpful in transitions.
The Arbors at Bluff Creek Terrace costs
The Arbors at Bluff Creek Terrace reviews
The Arbors at Bluff Creek Terrace images
Seniors and Modern Transportation: Exploring Uber, Lyft, and Other Ride-Hailing Options
Seniors benefit from ride-hailing services like Uber and Lyft, which provide convenient and accessible transportation options that promote independence and social engagement, while addressing mobility challenges. These platforms have adapted to meet senior needs with user-friendly features and safety measures, although costs can be a concern; community programs may help subsidize rides for older adults.
Comprehensive Guide to Qualifying for Home Health Care Services
The guide outlines the eligibility criteria for home health care services, emphasizing clinical requirements, insurance options, and application processes. It distinguishes between Medicare's strict and Medicaid's flexible qualifications while addressing challenges families may face in securing necessary care at home.
Powerful Realities of Elder Abuse and the Most Effective Ways to Report It
Elder abuse affects many older adults worldwide and includes physical, emotional, neglectful, and financial harm, with about one in six individuals over 60 experiencing abuse annually. Prevention and intervention strategies focus on awareness, support for caregivers, and mandatory reporting, while recovery necessitates comprehensive support for both physical and emotional needs.