1407 Brooke Ct., Steilacoom, WA 98388
To contact a resident: (253) 581-1492
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
St. Therese AFH Costs & Pricing
St. Therese Adult Family Home (AFH) offers an affordable semi-private room option at $2,000 per month, which is significantly lower than the average costs in both Pierce County and the state of Washington. In contrast, residents in Pierce County typically face monthly expenses of approximately $4,264, while the statewide average hovers around $4,267. This notable difference highlights St. Therese AFH as a cost-effective solution for families seeking quality care without compromising on financial stability. Overall, this pricing structure positions St. Therese as an attractive option for those looking to balance affordability with essential services in a caring environment.
| Floor plans | St. Therese AFH | Pierce County | Washington |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,000 | $4,264 | $4,272 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$270 / mo
Franke Tobey Jones - Retirement Estates
$2,270 to $6,270 / month10.0 miles away -
from +$164 / mo
Wesley Homes Lea Hill
$2,164 to $2,787 / month21.0 miles away -
from +$100 / mo
Patriots Landing Community
$2,100 to $5,350 / month5.7 miles away -
from -$250 / mo
The Rivers at Puyallup
$1,750 to $3,895 / month13.8 miles away -
from -$300 / mo
Peoples Retirement Community
$1,700 to $3,300 / month8.8 miles away
Overall Review of St. Therese AFH
Pros
Rowena and her staff (Hazel and Marie) are super caring and accommodating.- They show compassion to residents and families and provide genuine, thoughtful attention to those in their care.
- Rowena and her staff deliver a good experience and are appreciated for their help.
- The staff are nice and not at all rude to strangers, unlike much of their neighbors.
Review
St. Therese AFH in Steilacoom is best suited for seniors who want a small, home‑like setting where care is delivered with genuine warmth and sustained personal attention. This community seems ideal for residents who thrive on frequent, meaningful interactions with caregivers and a sense that staff truly knows their preferences, routines, and history. Families that value open access to caregivers and a close‑knit atmosphere will find a strong alignment here. The setting’s compact size supports quick responsiveness and everyday familiarity, delivering reassurance that a loved one is known and cherished rather than merely accommodated.
Key strengths emerge in the hands‑on caregiving model. Rowena, along with Hazel and Marie, is described as exceptionally caring, accommodating, and genuinely compassionate. This translates into attentive daily support and thoughtful attention to residents and their families. The staff’s approach appears to blend practical help with emotional warmth, responding with patience, coordinating with relatives, and adjusting routines to honor individual preferences. The remark that staff are not confrontational or rude to strangers compared with neighbors underscores a welcoming, respectful culture that can ease transitions for new residents and help visitors feel at ease.
Still, not every experience will feel identical, and some families may want alternatives. The presence of a three‑star rating alongside a strong positive note hints at possible variability in programming breadth, medical oversight, or service scope. For seniors who require 24/7 on‑site nursing, complex medical management, or highly structured daily activities, a larger facility with formal care plans could be a more suitable fit. For those prioritizing an expansive social calendar, broader rehab services, or greater on‑site amenities, exploring other options is prudent to ensure all needs are met.
How the positives stack up against potential limitations depends on prioritized values. The intimate, caregiver‑first approach is a powerful offset to the absence of a large campus offering every conceivable amenity. Personal rapport, quick responsiveness, and a family‑friendly atmosphere can translate into steady quality of life and peace of mind for many families. However, the small footprint can mean limited on‑site services, fewer amenities, and slower expansion of programs as needs evolve. The three‑star feedback should be weighed as a caution that while core care can be excellent, consistency across all daily aspects may vary and some residents might perceive gaps over time.
To decide, families should run a practical, hands‑on check. Tour the home and observe how staff interact with residents; inquire about staff‑to‑resident ratios, shift coverage, and overnight availability; ask about meal quality, mobility support, medication management, and accessibility. Clarify how family communication is handled, what discharge or transition planning looks like, and how transportation or errands are coordinated. Seek references from current residents’ families and explore emergency procedures and safety policies. Bring up specific routines, likes, and dislikes the resident has, and assess whether the team can consistently honor them.
Bottom line: St. Therese AFH offers a warm, person‑centered option in Steilacoom that can deliver meaningful daily comfort through a devoted staff. It is especially well‑suited for seniors who value individualized attention, a home‑like vibe, and a setting where caregivers truly know them. Those seeking more formal medical oversight, larger social networks, or broader on‑site amenities may want to consider alternatives to avoid feeling constrained. With a careful visit and direct conversations about expectations, families can determine whether this AFH aligns with their loved one’s care goals and lifestyle preferences, or whether another community would better match the required level of medical support and structured programming.
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Seattle-Tacoma International (24 miles away)
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing
Vibrant Senior Living: A Comprehensive Guide for Active Older Adults
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences