Sarah's Place Inc in Port Orchard, WA

Memory care communities with a similar price nearby

• from -$500 / mo

  Hummingbird Homecare

  5 from 24 reviews

  $3,000 / month

  24.5 miles away
• from +$500 / mo

  Riverton Home Care

  5 from 17 reviews

  $4,000 to $5,000 / month

  18.9 miles away
• from -$500 / mo

  Home Care in Kent Inc.

  5 from 16 reviews

  $3,000 to $3,500 / month

  22.9 miles away
• About the same

  Twin Lakes Haven Adult Family Home

  5 from 14 reviews

  $3,500 to $8,000 / month

  17.6 miles away
• from -$500 / mo

  Meridian AFH II

  5 from 9 reviews

  $3,000 to $3,500 / month

  16.6 miles away

Pros

• Liberty Place is one of the most caring environments in the region.
• The leadership at Liberty Place is outstanding, and the organization is responsive to residents' needs.
• The care and compassion shown at Liberty Place create an exceptional assisted living experience.
• Liberty Place is a respectable community with a design that facilitates resident independence while safeguarding safety.
• The amenities at Liberty Place are inviting and comfortable, speaking the language of welcome home.
• The Liberty Place team demonstrates professionalism, caring, and compassion.
• Liberty Place prioritizes residents and their families.
• The staff at Liberty Place are caring, providing safe and attentive care.
• Liberty Place offers a home-like atmosphere where residents feel at home.
• The activities director is amazing, and the executive director is hands-on and helpful.

Cons

• Management does not keep appointments and does not do what they say they will; they only seem to care about money.
• There was a huge dispute over not giving enough notice before moving her again.
• Her room was dirty, with dirty floors, used Depends stacked by the trash can, spills on countertops, and dirty dishes stacked up.
• When she was first placed there, she was not happy.

Review

This Port Orchard assisted living option is best suited for families seeking a warm, home-like environment where leadership is visible, responsive, and genuinely engaged with residents and families. It angles toward seniors who value personal connection, a team that knows their names and routines, and a culture that emphasizes compassion over glossy trappings. Those who want a polished, ultra-slick setting with perfect operational consistency may find the pace uneven and should consider alternatives with more formalized QA processes and stricter scheduling discipline.

The strongest positives center on leadership and the care teams. When executive leadership and on-site nursing leaders are accessible, the tone is notably proactive, and family members feel heard. Care staff are consistently described as kind, attentive, and genuinely caring, with a design that supports resident independence while maintaining safety. A lively activities director and a hands-on administrator contribute to a welcoming atmosphere, where residents appear engaged and the environment radiates a “welcome home” feeling. These elements create trust for families who want to believe their loved one is prioritized over profit margins.

Yet, the reviews reveal meaningful consistency gaps that prospective residents should weigh. Not all experiences line up with the positive narratives; some families encountered maintenance and cleanliness lapses, rooms that did not meet expectations, with belongings or chores left in disarray. A few accounts describe management or front-office follow-through as uneven, with reports of delayed responses or missed commitments before issues were resolved. Even when concerns were eventually addressed, the path to resolution was not always smooth, underscoring a need for residents’ families to stay engaged and hold leadership accountable.

This is where the pros either offset or collide with the cons. The core strength, hands-on leadership paired with compassionate, ongoing care, often translates into real peace of mind for families, especially when concerns arise. A responsive ED and care director can pivot quickly, and the culture of care tends to be resident- and family-centered, which can make imperfect operations more tolerable. For families willing to participate actively in care planning, regular check-ins, and explicit expectations, the positives can far outweigh the occasional service gaps. In practical terms, this means asking for a concrete care plan, clear housekeeping routines, and predictable follow-up timelines before move-in.

Those who should consider alternatives include families for whom spotless housekeeping, consistent appointment adherence, and flawless management communication are non-negotiable. If a clean, meticulously maintained environment is a top priority, or if their loved one requires high-frequency, tightly scheduled medical oversight, a facility with more standardized processes and a track record of flawless execution may better serve those needs. In addition, if a family cannot or will not engage regularly with the leadership team to address issues, the risk of unresolved gaps could loom larger.

In the end, this community offers a practical, compassionate option for those who prize relationships, a home-like feel, and active leadership. The verdict hinges on fit: a family must value a warm, person-centered model and be prepared to partner with administrators to safeguard consistency. Prospective residents should arrange thorough tours with the executive director and on-site care director, request recent references, review the daily routines for housekeeping and dining, and discuss a trial or watchful onboarding period. When clarity on care plans, accountability, and communication channels is established, this community can deliver meaningful peace of mind and a dignified, engaged living experience.