Bee Hive Homes of Colorado #3 Costs & Pricing
Bee Hive Homes of Colorado #3 offers competitive pricing for its living arrangements, particularly in comparison to the wider market in Weld County and the state of Colorado. For a one-bedroom accommodation, residents can expect a monthly cost of $3,000 at Bee Hive Homes, which is notably lower than the county average of $3,847 and the state average of $4,119. Similarly, for private room options, Bee Hive Homes charges $5,000 per month; while this is slightly above Weld County's average of $4,032, it remains competitive when set against the broader Colorado average of $4,142. Overall, Bee Hive Homes provides an appealing balance of affordability and quality care within the local landscape.
| Floor plans | Bee Hive Homes of Colorado #3 | Weld County | Colorado |
|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $3,000 | $3,847 | $4,118 |
| Private | $5,000 | $4,032 | $4,142 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$461 / mo
San Marino Retirement Community
$2,539 to $4,348 / month
21.7 miles away
-
from +$205 / mo
Sunrise at FlatIrons
$3,205 to $7,440 / month
20.7 miles away
-
from +$550 / mo
Park Regency Thornton
$3,550 to $5,950 / month
24.3 miles away
-
About the same
Mccoy Assisted Living And Alternative Care
$3,000 to $4,000 / month
20.9 miles away
-
from +$495 / mo
Garden Square at Greeley
$3,495 / month
23.2 miles away
Overall Review of Bee Hive Homes of Colorado #3
common
20 reviews mention this
Staff feels truly involved
Caregivers are described as engaged, compassionate, and available for questions.
Across the reviews, families consistently describe a care team that treats residents like family and shows up in the day-to-day, including checking in during meals and spending time with residents. Several reviewers also mention that owners or specific staff members are easy to reach and helpful. Even when reviewers had concerns, they still focused on how the community handled the people involved and the attention their loved one received.
differentiator
6 reviews mention this
Small setting supports personal attention
The smaller home-like setting is repeatedly linked to individualized care.
Multiple reviewers point to the communityâs smaller scale and describe staff getting to know residents and families well. People also mention choosing this place because they expected more personal, focused attention than a larger facility. Reviews describe caregivers providing personalized attention and treating residents as individuals rather than moving them through a routine.
common
8 reviews mention this
Meals are a consistent part
Residents and families mention meal quality and meal support.
Several reviews highlight meal support, including making sure residents are able to get to meals and enjoy whatâs served. Some families specifically praise the food as home cooked and tasty, while others describe practical details like caregivers sharing time around lunch. One reviewer also notes difficulty with chewing at times, suggesting food texture and consistency may not work well for every resident.
common
16 reviews mention this
Home-like look and cleanliness
Reviews frequently describe a clean, home-like environment.
A large share of reviewers describe the facility as clean, well kept, and warmly decorated, with common spaces that feel welcoming. Families also mention a house-like feel and comfortable rooms, reinforcing that it doesnât come across as an institutional setting. Cleanup and overall upkeep show up repeatedly as part of what made residents and families feel comfortable.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Activities can be limited
Activity involvement may depend on residentsâ abilities.
One reviewer says they couldnât really evaluate activities because their loved one was bedridden, which suggests participation can be constrained by mobility. Another reviewer feels the community could offer more activities to keep residents more active and involved. Together, the reviews indicate that activity variety and participation may not be equally strong for every resident.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Safety is discussed in a couple ways
Safety is mentioned both as reassuring and as a point of concern.
One family describes feeling confident their loved one was in a safe place after falls and worsening memory. Another reviewer mentions the physical setup is locked so residents canât get out. A separate negative review raises serious concerns about how communication and access were handled, which goes beyond building features and affects how safe the situation felt for family members.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.