2189 Crownhill Rd., La Jolla, CA 92109
To contact a resident: (858) 922-3102
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Mount Soledad Senior Care Costs & Pricing
Mount Soledad Senior Care offers private room accommodations at a monthly rate of $4,500, which is notably higher than the average costs within San Diego County and across California, both of which sit at $3,939. This premium pricing reflects the facility's commitment to providing high-quality services and personalized care that may not be available in other local options. While the cost is significantly above the regional average, residents may find value in the enhanced amenities and tailored support offered at Mount Soledad Senior Care, making it a compelling choice for families seeking exceptional care for their loved ones.
| Floor plans | Mount Soledad Senior Care | San Diego County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $4,500 | $3,939 | $3,939 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Mount Soledad Senior Care
Pros
Gus is kind, knowledgeable, professional, responsive, and passionate about his clients and providing quality care.
The La Jolla Senior Care Homes are exceptionalâclean, thoughtfully maintained, and located in a beautiful neighborhood, creating a warm and welcoming atmosphere.
The caregivers are compassionate, attentive, and truly go above and beyond to ensure each resident feels valued and supported.
The locations are beautiful, the staff is exceptional, and they truly provide everything one could hope for.
The setting is absolutely gorgeous with breathtaking views, providing a wonderful environment for residents to begin recovery.
Gus and Jennifer are hands-on, consistently present at the houses, and extremely approachable.
The homes feel like a family environment, with staff who listen, care, and make residents comfortable, including home-made meals and flexibility for different needs.
Cons
The assigned caretake abandoned the patient in the middle of the night and refused to send a replacement for seven hours, claiming no responsibility.
The staff ignored calls from the family unless the number was unfamiliar, showing a clear lack of accountability.
There was no accountability for their behavior, leaving the patient in a dangerous situation.
The facility was not really a place for dementia patients, described as mixed clientele, a worn house, a yippy dog, no music, and little outside activity.
There was no improvement after voicing complaints to management about lack of attention, compassion, or activities.
The family moved their loved one after ten months due to lack of attention, compassion, good care, or activities.
Review
Mount Soledad Senior Care in La Jolla is best suited for families seeking a true home-like, intimate setting where owners are visibly hands-on, and daily life centers on warmth, meals, and social connection. The community operates as a small, residential-style home with around a dozen residents, a setup that cultivates familiarity, personal attention, and consistent caregiver relationships. It appeals to seniors who value quiet dignity, a stable routine, and easy access to caregivers who know their preferences well. The location and ambiance, clean, well-kept homes with beautiful views and a welcoming neighborhood feel, enhance quality of life for residents who thrive on social engagement, regular activities, and home-cooked meals. For families prioritizing personalized care planning, direct communication with owners, and a comfortable, homelike atmosphere, this option stands out.
That strength, however, comes with clear caveats that families should weigh carefully. The community may not fit residents who require dementia-specific programming or high-level medical oversight. Several reviews flag the setting as mixed in terms of dementia readiness and outside activity, with some residents needing more structured stimulus or safety measures than a small home can consistently provide. A past report of an unattended patient and questions around accountability cannot be dismissed as minor. For families managing advanced memory impairment or seeking robust, 24/7 clinical monitoring, this home is unlikely to meet those needs. In short, itâs a strong match for independent or mildly assisted seniors who want social immersion and ongoing, person-centered care, but alternatives should be explored for memory care or higher acuity.
The primary positives are powerful and recurring. Owners Gus and Jennifer are described as deeply involved, accessible, and capable of guiding transitions with warmth and professionalism. Caregivers are portrayed as compassionate, attentive, and genuinely invested in residentsâ dignity and happiness. The homes themselves are praised for cleanliness, thoughtful maintenance, and a setting that feels welcoming and safe. Families frequently cite reliable communication, a responsive approach to questions, and a culture where residents are treated like members of a family. Meals, community activities, and opportunities for social engagement, along with occasional professional visits for music or art, round out a well-rounded, home-centered lifestyle. For families seeking a quietly active environment with continuous, familiar faces, these advantages carry substantial weight.
The notable drawbacks, when weighed against the benefits, still demand careful scrutiny. The most serious concern is accountability in crisis or lapse scenarios, highlighted by the overnight abandonment incident. That kind of risk is not easily offset by the rest of the strengths and should prompt stringent checks: explicit escalation protocols, transparent incident reporting, and strong caregiver supervision policies. The dementia-related caveats and the sense that some residents may not receive enough stimulation or outdoor activity raise practical questions for families whose loved ones require cognitive engagement or more varied enrichment. Aesthetics and location cannot compensate for gaps in safety oversight or inconsistent programming; these are the factors that ultimately determine daily peace of mind for families.
To make a well-informed decision, approach the evaluation with crisp, concrete questions. Insist on meeting the owners and touring the homes with a caregiver or nurse who can discuss day-to-day operations, staffing patterns, and care planning. Request a copy of the current care plans, incident logs, and staff-to-resident ratios across shifts. Inquire about dementia policies, memory-care availability, and how behavioral or cognitive needs are managed. Ask for references from current residentsâ families and inquire about emergency response protocols, medication management, and how concerns are escalated. Confirm what activities are routinely offered, and whether residents have opportunities for meaningful outings or facilitated social events. These details reveal whether the optimistic impressions in reviews align with present-day practices.
In the end, Mount Soledad Senior Care delivers a compelling package for a specific segment: seniors seeking an intimate, home-like alternative to a larger facility, with highly engaged owners, steady staff, and a vibrant social rhythm in a beautiful La Jolla setting. The caveat is clear enough to warrant a conservative conclusion for families with memory-care needs or those who cannot tolerate the risk of inconsistent crisis handling. For those who fit the profile, the pros, personalized attention, a warm atmosphere, strong professional endorsements, and a high-quality living environment, outweigh the cons. If memory care or aggressive medical oversight is essential, however, explore other options with dedicated dementia programming and clearer accountability structures.













Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Safeguarding Your Memory Through the Golden Years: Eight Ways to Preserve Cognitive Health
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment