Pleasant Hills Home Care Costs & Pricing
Pleasant Hills Home Care offers a range of living accommodations with pricing that reflects its commitment to quality care in a competitive market. For semi-private rooms, the monthly cost is set at $4,500, which is notably higher than the median costs in both Orange County and across California. Private rooms and one-bedroom units are priced at $5,000 each, again exceeding state and county averages. Specifically, while Orange County's private room costs average around $4,104 and one-bedroom units at $4,380, Pleasant Hills maintains its premium position by prioritizing personalized care and community well-being. This investment in luxurious surroundings and dedicated support may appeal to those seeking an enhanced living experience for themselves or their loved ones.
| Floor plans | Pleasant Hills Home Care | Orange County | California |
|---|
| Semi-Private | $4,500 | $3,431 | $3,333 |
| Private | $5,000 | $4,104 | $3,939 |
| 1 Bedroom | $5,000 | $4,380 | $4,340 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$505 / mo
Cadence Brea
$3,995 to $5,500 / month
2.2 miles away
-
About the same
Heritage Senior Home Care
$4,500 to $4,800 / month
13.7 miles away
-
About the same
Casa Bella
$4,500 / month
8.7 miles away
-
from -$500 / mo
Royal
$4,000 to $4,800 / month
8.4 miles away
-
from -$700 / mo
Rose Garden Villa II
$3,800 to $6,000 / month
16.8 miles away
Overall Review of Pleasant Hills Home Care
common
17 reviews mention this
Caregivers feel dependable and caring
Residents describe caregivers who are courteous, compassionate, and dependable in daily support.
Across the reviews, families and clients repeatedly emphasize the day-to-day care they received, including help with routines like bathing, dressing, mobility support, and household tasks. Multiple reviewers also mention professionalism and trustworthiness, along with caregivers who show up on time and provide patient, kind support. A few reviews also note continuity when the same caregiver is available for multiple months, which residents say made a noticeable difference.
common
7 reviews mention this
Communication and vitals tracking
Residents highlight communication that includes updates, documentation, and responsive follow-through.
Several reviews describe caregivers coordinating care with clear updates—such as logging vitals and communicating by text or through a tracking portal—so families could feel less anxious between visits. At the same time, the negative reviews focus on the opposite experience: missed calls, limited explanations, and delayed communication during no-shows or staffing gaps. These contrasting accounts center the same theme—how reliably the agency keeps people informed—either reducing worry or adding stress when care doesn’t arrive as expected.
caveat
4 reviews mention this
Staffing gaps and turnover
Some families report inconsistent staffing and no-shows that disrupt continuity of care.
A set of reviews describe problems with stability, including frequent aide changes and difficulty maintaining the same level of support over time. Other reviewers point to no-shows and inadequate notice, describing waiting for visits that didn’t happen and then having to follow up themselves. One negative review specifically ties these staffing issues to the need for consistent dementia-capable care, describing that the frequent changes made support harder to manage.
common
3 reviews mention this
Medication reminders and management
Residents mention support with medication routines, including reminders and timely administration.
Reviews that discuss medication focus on help keeping schedules on track, including medication times and reminders when a person may struggle with taking medications independently. One reviewer also describes medication support becoming easier over time as part of a broader care plan, while another describes ensuring medications were taken on time without escalating conflict. Taken together with resident descriptions of medication guidance, the community’s care approach appears to place emphasis on staying organized with daily medication routines.
common
3 reviews mention this
Meals and low-sodium cooking
Meals provided as part of care include preparation that can support dietary needs.
Some reviews mention help with food as part of daily support, including preparing meals and helping with eating as needed. One reviewer describes low-sodium soup preparation alongside broader monitoring, while another describes the evening meal feeling calmer during recovery and rehabilitation. Another review also references assistance with food as part of the help caregivers provide.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Pets and staffing concerns
Pets show up in reviews as a practical factor that can affect how care is handled.
Two reviews reference pets in different ways: one describes a caregiver working with a dog during a visit, including engaging interactions. Another describes the presence of multiple cats being cited later as a reason for staffing challenges, despite being disclosed earlier. Together, the reviews suggest pet-related logistics may come into play depending on the situation and the agency’s follow-through.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Activities on-site
Bath tubs
Devotional services on-site
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Private
Wheelchair accessible showers
Long Beach (Daugherty) (16 miles away)
Ambulatory care
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Medication management
Meals provided
Christian services
Small, intimate 6-bed home with 24/7 supervision, personalized care, diabetes-friendly meals, and transportation to medical visits.
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing
Vibrant Senior Living: A Comprehensive Guide for Active Older Adults
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences