Constant Care in Phoenix, AZ

Memory care communities with a similar price nearby

• from -$500 / mo

  La Bella Vita ALH

  5 from 31 reviews

  $2,500 to $7,000 / month

  24.9 miles away
• About the same

  Desert Garden Senior Living

  5 from 21 reviews

  $3,000 to $3,500 / month

  10.3 miles away
• from -$500 / mo

  Anc Assisted Living Homes I

  5 from 18 reviews

  $2,500 to $3,500 / month

  23.1 miles away
• from -$300 / mo

  Caring Hearts Senior Care

  5 from 16 reviews

  $2,700 to $3,500 / month

  20.4 miles away
• About the same

  Horizon Assisted Living

  5 from 14 reviews

  $3,000 / month

  14.3 miles away

Pros

• The staff at Constant Care Assisted Living are very attentive to residents' needs at all times.
• Upon arrival, residents are bathed, shaved, and cared for to help them feel comfortable.
• They ask residents about their favorite foods to ensure they feel at home.
• The house is beautiful and small, creating a cozy, home-like environment.
• The location near the VA makes it a good choice for veterans.
• The staff take great care of their residents.
• The owner is caring and fosters a warm, homey atmosphere.
• The environment is clean, welcoming, and friendly, contributing to residents' happiness.
• The food is good and the staff's knowledge and care are excellent.

Cons

• The first caregiver was not gentle and did not know how to properly position her.
• He darkened the room so he could watch his movies or TV on his phone, showing neglectful care.
• He had no idea how to transfer a patient who could bear some weight and rough-dragged her back to bed, causing large skin tears that bled heavily.
• He left after the harm, with no dressings or proper follow-up care.
• The agency does not provide adequate training.
• The agency had the nerve to charge for the last two sessions.
• The director took a cavalier attitude toward the unnecessary suffering at the end of her life.

Review

Constant Care in Phoenix, AZ is best suited for families seeking a small, home-like assisted living experience where personalized attention and owner involvement steer daily care. This community shines for residents who value a warm, intimate setting, a calm pace, and staff who appear genuinely invested in individual preferences, down to meals and daily routines. The proximity to veterans’ resources and a reputation for a clean, welcoming environment add practical appeal for families with veterans or those who want easy family access. Those who need a high-intensity clinical program, pet-friendly policies, or a broad, structured activities calendar may find the fit less ideal and should consider alternatives.

The strongest positives are unmistakable: a consistently attentive staff that greets residents with prompt grooming, bathing, and dressing on arrival; a real emphasis on comfort and belonging; and a small-house feel that translates into visible oversight and strong relational ties. Families repeatedly note the owner’s hands-on care and a team that has remained steady for years, which translates into dependable routines and a sense of continuity. Cleanliness, a welcoming atmosphere, and good-quality meals are recurring themes, contributing to a sense that the resident’s day-to-day life remains dignified and pleasant. For relatives who want to visit and feel confident that staff know their loved one’s preferences, Constant Care delivers.

Yet there are meaningful caveats that must be weighed. The most serious concern in the reviews centers on the use of an affiliated home health care agency, where at least one situation described a caregiver who behaved rough and contributed to serious skin tears, with a response from leadership that left the family unsettled. This is not a minor footnote; it implicates caregiver training, transfer safety, and the facility’s oversight of third-party providers. Such reports should prompt prospective families to demand explicit, written assurances about how outside caregivers are trained, supervised, and evaluated, and to verify who bears responsibility when problems arise. In addition, cost and logistics loom large: a private room with a shared bath runs around $3,000 per month, transportation is an add-on, residents must supply their own incontinence products, and a co-pay is required. A monthly geriatric physician is listed as part of the package, which can be beneficial but also adds to the ongoing expense.

These strengths and weaknesses do not exist in isolation; they must be weighed against each other. The small, homey setting, deep personal attention, and owner-driven culture can offset potential gaps in programming by providing predictable, nurturing care and easy access to caregivers who know the resident’s history and preferences. The strength of a stable, caring team and a clean, comfortable environment can deliver real peace of mind for families who prioritize dignity and warmth over breadth of services. However, when care needs extend beyond what a small home-like setting can safely manage, especially if reliance on external aides becomes a recurring factor, those positives can be offset by safety and consistency concerns.

For families actively evaluating Constant Care, practical next steps matter. Request to meet with the owner and the core caregiving team, and ask for a clear outline of how third-party home health aides are vetted, trained, and supervised. Obtain a written statement of what the base rate includes and what costs are extra, particularly for transportation, co-pays, and necessary supplies. Inquire about activity levels and dementia-friendly programming to determine whether the offerings align with the resident’s current and anticipated needs. Finally, probe the policy on pets and the flexibility to tailor services if a resident requires more intensive medical oversight or a different caregiving approach.

In the end, Constant Care represents a compelling option for families prioritizing proximity to a small, tightly knit community where staff know residents well and care feels personal. It is not the right fit for those who require robust clinical management, wide-ranging activities, or a low-cost model. When the desire is for a warm, reliable home environment with attentive caregivers who treat residents like family, and when transparency about third-party caregiving and costs is achievable, Constant Care deserves serious consideration. If those conditions don’t align, exploring alternatives with broader clinical supports or stricter oversight may save time, money, and worry.