1846 South 162nd ln, Goodyear, AZ 85338
To contact a resident: (602) 486-7120
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
All Valley Home Care, LLC Costs & Pricing
All Valley Home Care, LLC offers competitive pricing for its services compared to the broader market rates in Maricopa County and the state of Arizona. For semi-private rooms, All Valley's monthly rate is $2,000, significantly lower than the county average of $2,801 and the state average of $2,820. This demonstrates a cost-effective option for those seeking affordable care without compromising quality. Similarly, for private rooms, All Valley's fee stands at $3,000 - again undercutting both the county's average of $3,318 and the state's average of $3,345. These pricing advantages position All Valley Home Care as an attractive choice for families seeking comprehensive home care solutions that align with their budgetary needs.
| Floor plans | All Valley Home Care, LLC | Maricopa County | Arizona |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,000 | $2,801 | $2,820 |
| Private | $3,000 | $3,318 | $3,345 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of All Valley Home Care, LLC
Pros
Samantha has been amazing as a caregiver for the father.
She has accommodated the father's needs, including house chores, meal prep, and showering.
Her communication with the father is like that of a family member.
She is a blessing to the father.
A Place At Home is recommended for anyone needing a caregiver with compassion, care, and understanding of family members' needs.
Cons
The reviewer warns others not to put their loved ones there.
They state their father died after a stay of five hours.
They claim the operator running the place is keeping the entire rent.
They reveal that their dad lived there for only about 20 hours.
They describe the staff as despicable.
They urge anyone who loves their parents to keep them far away from this dungeon.
Review
All Valley Home Care, LLC in Goodyear, AZ is best suited for families seeking a very personal, caregiver-driven environment where daily living tasks and personal care can be carried out with a strong, family-like touch. The standout feature across experiences is the direct, affection-based support from a single caregiver who genuinely communicates with the family and treats the resident as if they are part of the caregiver’s own circle. This creates a warm, comfortable dynamic for residents who crave intimacy, consistency in daily routines, and hands-on help with chores, meals, and hygiene.
This option may not fit every situation. Families that require transparent, scalable administration, predictable pricing, and broad staff coverage should consider alternatives. The limited sample of reviews raises questions about governance and financial practices, not about caregiving capacity alone. The bar for comfort rises when care hinges on a small team rather than a larger facility with formalized oversight, 24/7 nursing presence, and clear contractual protections.
On the positive side, the most consistent praise centers on the caregiver’s compassion and practical support. The ability to handle house chores, meal preparation, showers, and direct, familial communication with the resident makes daily life smoother and more dignified. This level of hands-on, empathetic care can significantly lessen family stress, improve adherence to routines, and foster emotional stability for someone who thrives on personal connection and familiar surroundings. When a family member needs a trusted, attentive companion to bridge between home and more structured care, this kind of caregiver-driven approach can be the decisive difference.
The most serious red flag comes from the negative review that alleges mismanagement and troubling billing behavior. The claim that the administrator kept the entire rent and that a resident endured a very short stay paints a picture of governance gaps that cannot be ignored. While this represents a single, alarming perspective in a tiny sample, it signals the need for due diligence: verify the ownership, confirm billing practices, request a detailed contract, ask for a written discharge policy, and review state licensing and complaint history. In practical terms, such concerns can undermine trust even when caregiving quality appears high.
Whether the strong caregiver relationship can offset the cons depends on what matters most to the family. If the resident’s needs are primarily daily living support and companionship, and the family can actively participate in care planning and monitoring, the positives may outweigh the governance risks, provided there is visible, ongoing oversight and transparent financial terms. To reduce risk, insist on meeting the caregiver in depth, review a formal care plan, obtain a complete and itemized pricing schedule, and secure a clear discharge or cancellation policy. Request references and, if possible, arrange a brief trial period to observe how care is delivered in real life.
Ultimately, the decision hinges on balancing the intimate, person-centered care model against governance and pricing clarity. All Valley Home Care, LLC offers a compelling option for families who prioritize a warm, family-like caregiving relationship and can tolerate, with diligence, the possibility of administrative questions. For those who cannot tolerate questions around billing transparency or who seek robust, institutional-level oversight, exploring alternatives with larger teams, fixed staffing, and clearer governance will provide greater long-term assurance. A careful, in-person evaluation, meeting the caregiver, reviewing the care plan, and testing the contract terms, will clarify whether this community truly fits the resident’s needs and the family’s expectations.












Delirium and Dementia: Unraveling the Key Differences
Are Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease Lethal? A Comprehensive Exploration
Exploring the Power of Reminiscence Therapy for Individuals With Dementia