311 Hanover Vlg, Wilkes Barre, PA 18702
To contact a resident: (570) 829-3016
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Hanover Village Apartments
Pros
The complex looks clean from the outside and is well maintained, and the managers are nice people. - It is described as affordable.
- Some reviewers say the place is highly recommended.
Cons
It is not family friendly.- Management is accused of favoritism and sneaky activity in the office.
- The property is not kid-friendly, and elderly tenants make residents uncomfortable by watching doors and cursing at children.
- Management barely does their job; landlords quick to raise rents but do not fix up apartments.
- There is a mouse problem and cheap maintenance; underneath the building isn’t sealed.
- The washing machines leave stains on clothes.
- There has been gun violence recently.
- They spray over mold instead of fixing it properly.
- It is best to steer clear due to shootings and fights; residents fear for their well-being.
- Neighbors are terrible and management isn’t addressing issues after police calls.
- The unit falls apart within a year: no cabinets, black mold in the bathroom, and closet doors hanging off.
- No one returns calls and staff are quick to threaten when problems arise.
Review
Hanover Village Apartments in Wilkes-Barre is best suited for budget-conscious adults who want a low-cost address and straightforward, no-fruss living rather than a polished, family-friendly community. Several reviews note the exterior and common areas can appear clean and reasonably maintained, and a portion of residents describe the on-site managers as pleasant. This combination makes the property a potential option for tenants who prioritize affordable rent and a simple rental experience over amenities, neighborly feel, or a safe, kid-friendly atmosphere. In short, it works for those who can tolerate limited services and a tougher overall living climate in exchange for lower housing costs.
Those with children or families should seriously consider alternatives. The property is repeatedly described as not kid-friendly, with accounts of neighbors watching doors, complaints directed at children, and a general sense that family life is not welcome. The absence of parks, pet-friendly policies, and other family-oriented amenities, along with reports of heavy police activity and violence nearby, makes this a risky fit for households with kids. Prospective tenants with a priority on a calm, safe environment or reliable, family-supportive features would likely be better served elsewhere.
From a value perspective, the main pros, lower rent and some instances of on-site management courtesy, do offer a practical offset to certain drawbacks, but the balance tilts unfavorably on several fronts. The property’s external presentation is described as clean, and a subset of residents express willingness to recommend the place or say they hope to be accepted. Those who prioritize affordable housing and can overlook maintenance lags may find a temporary home here. Yet even among supporters, the rewards are tempered by recurring demands for attention that rarely translate into real, timely upgrades.
The core management and operations issues repeatedly surface as a decisive negative. The impression that “management lives there” and may exhibit favoritism undermines trust and predictability. Calls go unanswered, and when problems arise, responses can be slow or threatening rather than constructive. Rent increases are criticized as quick and disproportionate to the level of apartment upkeep, which compounds frustration. This is not a community where prompt, transparent service is reliably available, and that reality gnaws at residents who need steady, predictable support frommanagement.
Safety and day-to-day living conditions compound the decision pressure. Gun violence and public disturbances have been cited, along with frequent police calls and troubling neighbor interactions. Mold, mildew, and other maintenance failures appear alongside a lack of timely repairs, leading to ongoing health and comfort concerns. The absence of kid-friendly amenities, combined with unwelcoming neighborhoods and pervasive safety concerns, makes daily life more stressful than it should be in an apartment setting. For families or individuals seeking peace of mind, these factors render the option unattractive.
The prudent conclusion centers on a stark trade-off: Hanover Village can serve as a stepping-stone for those who must minimize housing costs and can tolerate a challenging safety and management landscape. For anyone who values reliable maintenance, proactive, professional management, clear communication, and a genuinely kid-friendly environment, alternatives must be pursued. Before committing, it is wise to conduct a thorough, in-person assessment, speaking with current residents at different times, inspecting units for mold and repairs, and testing responsiveness to inquiries. The decision hinges on whether the financial savings justify living with daily safety risks, management inconsistency, and limited family amenities.
Independent Living
Wilkes-Barre Scranton International (12 miles away)
Recognizing the Journey: Understanding and Navigating Anticipatory Grief
Encouraging Participation in Adult Day Care: A Guide to Supporting a Hesitant Parent
Comprehensive Exploration of Living Wills and Other Advance Directives