9314 Sassafras St, Erie, PA 16502
To contact a resident: (814) 454-3234
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Highpoint Towers
Pros
They described it as wonderful.
They described the building as very nice and clean.
They found it to be a nice place to stay.
Cons
The reviewer questions why smoking is allowed in an apartment when itâs supposed to be a smoke-free environment.
The reviewer critiques the buildingâs safety, noting that murders have occurred in the high-rise.
The reviewer states they moved their mom out after the first murder, signaling ongoing safety concerns.
Review
Highpoint Towers in Erie is best suited for independent seniors who want a downtown, amenity-rich high-rise experience and can tolerate imperfect security assurances. The building presents a polished, clean exterior and well-maintained interiors, delivering the low-effort, ready-to-live-in environment that many retirees seek. For residents who value social opportunities, convenient on-site conveniences, and the sense of living in a wakefully urban address, this property offers tangible appeal. It is not the right choice for those who require robust safety guarantees or ongoing medical or personal-care support, since the experiences described by residents reveal gaps between policy and practice.
Alternatives should be seriously considered by families prioritizing safety and reliability. The past year has included violent incidents on-site, including murders within the high-rise, which undermines confidence that security measures are truly effective. For households that demand a strict smoke-free living environment with consistent enforcement, the reports of smoking in apartments despite a stated policy signal ongoing enforcement challenges. In short, for risk-averse seniors and for families seeking a predictable safety baseline, other options with stronger governance and clearer safety records deserve close attention.
On the upside, the building earns praise for its cleanliness and overall presentation. Reviews describe a very nice, well-kept structure, with statements like âWonderfulâ and âVery nice building, clean,â underscoring a tangible, enjoyable living environment on a day-to-day basis. The high-rise setting also translates into convenient access to urban services, scenic views, and opportunities to mingle with neighbors in shared spaces. For relatively self-sufficient residents who want a lively but manageable city living experience, these attributes hold real value and can enhance daily comfort.
Nevertheless, the most consequential drawbacks are substantial. The reported violent incidents, including murders inside the building, raise serious questions about safety, perceived security, and incident responsiveness. Such events reshape what âsecureâ means for a senior living option and can erode trust in the premises as a long-term home. Compounding the concern is a noted lapse in enforcing the smoke-free policy, which not only affects comfort but also health considerations in a senior setting. These factors elevate risk in a way that cosmetic amenities cannot offset.
When weighing pros against cons, the clean, pleasant environment, and social potential offer meaningful day-to-day value for certain residents, particularly those who are more self-reliant and desire downtown access. Yet the gravity of violent incidents and enforcement gaps tends to dominate decision-making for families evaluating a long-term move for an at-risk relative. The property may suit short stays or situations where risk tolerance is unusually high, but it falls short for anyone seeking a high-certainty, low-crisis living option.
In the end, safety and transparency are the decisive criteria. If safety and clear, credible incident management matter, steer toward alternatives with visible on-site staffing, robust security protocols, and a proven crime-prevention record. If Highpoint Towers remains on the potential list, pursue a rigorous due-diligence process: request current incident reports, ask about concrete security upgrades and staffing levels, verify around-the-clock management presence, and confirm how the smoke-free policy is enforced. Interview current residents about responsiveness and daily security experiences, and insist on concrete assurances before making a commitment. Only with credible, demonstrated improvements on safety and policy enforcement should this community be seriously considered for a relative needing dependable security.










Understanding the Nuances of Palliative Care and Hospice: A Comprehensive Exploration
Fecal Incontinence in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Guide
Recognizing the Journey: Understanding and Navigating Anticipatory Grief