Del Nido Apartments

Pros

• Del Nido is inexpensive.
• It is a nice place to live.
• The management is continually improving the apartments and the grounds.
• It is quiet.
• There is plenty of parking.
• There are no upstairs neighbors.
• The daughter enjoyed the pool.
• The apartment is cute.
• The apartment is fairly quiet.

Cons

• The management is described as unfriendly, uncaring, and unfair.
• The property is infested with roaches, and cleaning fees are charged regardless of condition.
• Tenants are charged for pre-existing damages or missing items without proof.
• Residents feel the management intrudes into their personal lives and creates a hostile environment.
• Move-in condition records are unreliable, with blame placed on new tenants for prior-tenant issues.
• Advertising is misleading about features like hardwood floors, kitchen size, and appliances (no dishwasher).
• Paystubs or income proof in non-English languages are not accepted, denying applicants unfairly.
• The cinder block walls contribute to difficulty heating the apartments in winter.

Review

Del Nido is described by residents as a place that can feel affordable and pleasant at first glance, a spot you might return to because it's easy on the wallet and the grounds are kept in reasonable shape. Several accounts note that the complex has improved over time, with management making ongoing efforts to upgrade the apartments and the surrounding property. The property is also praised for being quiet and for offering ample parking, with one notable practical perk mentioned by a former resident: there are no upstairs neighbors to contend with. Taken together, these positives create a picture of Del Nido as a convenient, budget-friendly option that can still feel like a decent home when the grounds are well maintained and the noise level stays low.

Reflecting back on a prior stay, a tenant who lived there in 2013 recalls a mixed but more favorable experience. They were there for about a year, and their daughter enjoyed the pool, which stands out as a highlight. The resident at that time found management to be reasonable, though not spectacular, and one practical criticism lingered: the cinder block construction made it hard to stay warm in the winter, signaling that some building features could pose real comfort issues. Beyond that, there wasn't anything that stood out as especially remarkable for good or ill, suggesting a sense of stability and routine rather than standout positives or negatives during that period.

In a more recent and considerably harsher tone, another reviewer describes a truly negative encounter with the leasing office, centering on a language barrier. They explain that the manager could not understand pay stubs or proof of income because the documents were not in English, and they were ultimately refused service on that basis. This account underscores the potential for communication hurdles to create immediate barriers to securing housing, casting the experience in a tone of unfairness and bureaucratic rigidity that can leave prospective tenants feeling singled out or misjudged.

A further and starkly alarming theme across several comments is an infestation of roaches, coupled with aggressive and opaque financial practices. One reviewer bluntly warns that the entire place is infested with roaches and that they would be charged a cleaning fee regardless of the conditions. This sentiment is part of a broader pattern of dissatisfaction that emphasizes fear of pests and distrust of the billing process, illustrating a climate in which residents feel that basic maintenance issues translate into financial penalties rather than solutions.

The overall lived experience, for this set of reviews, swings toward feeling constantly scrutinized by management. The narrator describes management as intrusive to the point of "always in everyone's business," creating an atmosphere where tenants felt like they were walking on eggshells even when they were quiet residents. In this environment, preexisting conditions become a battleground when moving out: a case is described where the AC cover, already broken upon move-in, became the charge that the former tenant could not bear, framed by accusations of trying to pass responsibility off to them. The implication is that tenants should document almost everything - take pictures of every defect and keep a careful record on the move-in sheet - because the management may dispute conditions or attempt to assign blame retroactively.

Move-out disputes are a recurring theme, with particular emphasis on photos and preexisting damage. One account details being blamed for stains in a bathtub that were decades old and clearly visible before move-in, along with a hefty cleaning charge despite hiring a professional cleaning service. The resident recalls paying for an additional cleaning day and still facing a charge that prevailed without proof or photographs of supposed damages. There is also mention of missing screens and "holes" in the living area that were charged for even though the renter did not hang anything there; in several instances, management reportedly declined to verify or reference the record of prior tenants to establish the true condition of the unit. The sense conveyed is one of a system that shifts the burden of proof onto tenants and relies on contested or absent documentation to justify charges.

Advertising versus reality rounds out the picture with a blunt note about misrepresentation. The reviews reference claims of hardwood floors and a "480 square foot" footprint that allegedly do not match the actual materials or layout. Specifically, the floors are described as vinyl rather than hardwood or laminate, and the kitchen is characterized as full-sized in ad copy but in reality is half-sized with full appliances but no dishwasher. Despite these caveats, one reviewer still calls the apartment cute and fairly quiet, hinting at a complex that can be appealing in its own right if the marketing promises align with what tenants actually encounter. The final judgment on management, however, remains decidedly mixed: unfriendly, uncaring, and unfair are the terms used by one writer to describe the staff, reinforcing a sense of inconsistency between the property's outward charm and the day-to-day experience of living there.

Taken together, the collection of impressions presents a complex portrait of Del Nido. On one hand, the place can offer affordability, quiet grounds, a convenient location, and some improvements over time. On the other hand, multiple residents recount serious problems, from pests and unreliable maintenance communications to aggressive, charge-prone management practices and misleading advertising. The spectrum of experiences suggests that potential tenants should proceed with caution: document conditions meticulously at move-in, insist on clear and corroborated documentation for any charges, and be aware that language barriers or miscommunications can compound financial and logistical hurdles. In this light, Del Nido emerges as a dual-edged option - capable of delivering comfort and value for some, but demanding vigilance and preparedness for others who encounter its more troublesome days.

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (0.2 miles)
• Walgreens (0.3 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.4 miles)
• Walgreens (1.8 miles)
• Walgreens (1.9 miles)
• Authentic 209 (1.9 miles)
• Save Mart Supermarkets (2.1 miles)

Physicians

• Silvia Diego, MD (0.3 miles)
• Lisa Gil, MD (0.3 miles)
• Dr Lenita Williamson, M.D. Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine (0.4 miles)
• Michael J Sakamoto MD (0.5 miles)
• Kim Stevens MD (0.5 miles)
• David Demartini MD (0.5 miles)
• Stanislaus Eye Surgery (0.5 miles)

Parks

• East La Loma Park (0.6 miles)
• Riverside Park (1.1 miles)
• Orchard Park (1.4 miles)
• Freedom Park (2 miles)
• Graceada Park (2.2 miles)
• Eisenhut Park (2.8 miles)
• Davis Community Park (2.9 miles)

Restaurants

• Taco Bell (1 miles)
• Rivets American Grill (1.2 miles)
• China Gate (1.4 miles)
• Grand Buffet (1.6 miles)
• Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen (1.7 miles)
• Twisted Pig Bar and Grill (1.8 miles)
• Verona's Cucina Italiana (1.9 miles)

Hospitals

• Stanislaus County Health Services Agency (1.4 miles)
• Central Valley Specialty Hospital (2 miles)
• Telecare Corporation (3.1 miles)
• Mckinney Anthony (3.1 miles)
• Frisancho, Miguel A DDS (3.4 miles)

Cafes

• Giacomos (1.7 miles)
• Dutch Bros Coffee (2 miles)
• Kung Fu Tea (2.8 miles)
• Starbucks (3.3 miles)
• Starbucks (3.4 miles)
• Panera Bread (3.8 miles)

Places of Worship

• Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (2.5 miles)
• Trinity United Presbyterian Church (3.5 miles)

Transportation

• Modesto Amtrak Station (MOD) (2.6 miles)

Theaters

• Regal Modesto (3.3 miles)