510 Meadow Lane, Wrightstown, WI 54180
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Matthews Of Wrightstown Costs & Pricing
At Matthews Of Wrightstown, the monthly cost for a studio apartment is $4,590, which positions it slightly above the average rates in Outagamie County and significantly higher than the state average for Wisconsin. In comparison, the cost in Outagamie County stands at $4,320, while the statewide average is considerably lower at $3,999. This pricing reflects Matthews' commitment to offering a high-quality living experience and amenities that may not be available at other facilities within the region. While it might appear more expensive than its local counterparts and state averages, this premium could be indicative of enhanced services or community features that appeal to prospective residents seeking both comfort and quality care.
| Floor plans | Matthews Of Wrightstown | Outagamie County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $4,590 | $4,320 | $3,999 |
Overall Review of Matthews Of Wrightstown
Pros
The staff at this service are very helpful in finding caregivers who can assist with a loved one's needs.- The caretaker is nice, respectful, and caring.
- The caretaker is always willing to meet the care needs of a loved one.
- The caretaker arrives on time and is very helpful.
- The service is highly recommended to other families for the care of a loved one and offers good value for the care.
- The staff are friendly.
Cons
The reviewer claims the service would strip a loved one’s independence by giving staff full control.- The reviewer describes the place as two-faced and advises others to steer clear.
- The reviewer states that the service promises many things but delivers nothing.
- The reviewer warns to stay away from the place.
Review
Matthews Of Wrightstown is best suited for families that prioritize dependable, respectful daily support for a loved one who still needs hands-on assistance but can function with steady oversight. This community appears to work best when a caregiver can build a consistent, on-time routine and when cost-conscious care matters. Families that want a straightforward care relationship, where staff respond promptly to needs and family members aren’t left guessing who will be helping next, will likely find value here. The setting fits households seeking practical help with everyday tasks, medication reminders, and regular check-ins, delivered by a team that comes through on punctuality and courtesy. Those seeking a high-touch, aggressively proactive care model or a heavy emphasis on autonomy and self-determination will want to look elsewhere.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are clear: independence-forward residents who prize expansive programming, strong advocacy, and highly transparent promises should look at other communities. The strongest red flag from mixed experiences is a sense that commitments are promised but not consistently delivered, and that management may not always align with resident or family expectations. Families who require a robust, clearly articulated care plan with verifiable outcomes, or who want a setting that markedly prioritizes resident autonomy, should broaden their search. In short, this community can satisfy practical caregiving needs, but it may not be the right fit for those chasing precise guarantees or ambitious independence supports.
On the plus side, the most consistent and noteworthy strengths are practical and dependable. Staff are described as helpful, friendly, and respectful, with care teams willing to accommodate specific family requests and to source appropriate assistance for a husband or wife. The caregiver who regularly arrives on time and maintains a helpful, collaborative posture can reduce daily stress for families, ensuring that essential routines are followed and that care needs are addressed without constant follow-up. The perception of good value, receiving attentive support at a fair price, also stands out as a meaningful advantage for households monitoring budgets and seeking predictable monthly costs.
Yet the notable drawbacks cannot be dismissed. The most pointed criticisms center on promises that appear to be unfulfilled and on a perceived mismatch between what is promised and what is delivered. Phrases like “two-faced” and commentary about delivering nothing despite assurances signal a risk of unmet expectations and limited trust in advocacy or program breadth. Another recurrent concern is the sense that allowing the loved one to relinquish independence, while some families may view this as appropriate for safety, could be perceived as a loss of autonomy by others. For families that prize clarity, proactive communication, and a transparent, results-driven care plan, these are real cautions.
How the positives help offset the negatives varies by situation. For a family prioritizing reliable daily support and a straightforward care flow, the dependable staff and reasonable value can substantially offset concerns about promised services if those services are small in scope or frequently clarified in writing. When caretaking tasks are the primary need, grooming, medication reminders, timely assistance, the on-time, respectful aides can provide essential peace of mind. However, for those who require unwavering promises, sustained autonomy, or a highly individualized care roadmap with measurable outcomes, the cons loom larger and may erode confidence over time. The risk-reward balance tilts toward “solid everyday care at fair value” for practical caregivers, but toward caution for those pursuing aspirational independence or highly transparent guarantees.
Bottom line: Matthews Of Wrightstown works best for families seeking steady, respectful hands-on care at a reasonable price, with caregivers who show up, listen, and act. It is less suitable for households where independence, aggressive advocacy, or guaranteed service promises are non-negotiable. Prospective families should prioritize direct conversations about care plans, caregiver assignment, and what “value” covers in the monthly rate. Before committing, request a written outline of services, a sample care schedule, and opportunities to speak with current residents or families about their experiences. If independence and explicit promise fulfillment are must-haves, compare this community with others that foreground autonomy and transparent outcomes to avoid ending up with a good-but-incomplete fit.
16 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Activities off-site
Bath tubs
Beautician on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Respite or short term stays offered
Telephone
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Austin Straubel International (12 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Dementia waiver
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
Hospice waiver
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Exploring the Path to Senior Living: A Comprehensive Look at Independent Living and Assisted Living
Is Assisted Living Deductible on Your Taxes? Understanding the Complexities of Assisted Living Expenses and Deductions
Assisted Living Support for Veterans: A Complete and Detailed Overview
