5311 Douglas Ave., Caledonia, WI 53402
To contact a resident: (262) 752-1000
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
The Parkview II Costs & Pricing
The Parkview II offers competitive monthly rental rates that stand in stark contrast to the broader housing market in Racine County and the state of Wisconsin. For instance, a one-bedroom apartment at The Parkview II is priced at an affordable $627, significantly lower than the county average of $2,945 and the state average of $3,412. Similarly, two-bedroom units are available for just $752, compared to Racine County's average of $2,459 and Wisconsin's overall average of $3,111. These cost differences highlight The Parkview II as an attractive option for individuals and families seeking quality living arrangements without the financial strain typically associated with housing in the region.
| Floor plans | The Parkview II | Racine County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $627 | $2,945 | $3,412 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $752 | $2,459 | $3,111 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of The Parkview II
Pros
The residents appreciate two nice maintenance people.
Cons
The owners only worry about money, rush to fill vacancies, and ignore the needs of current residents.
It feels like a bait-and-switch: leases are signed, rules keep changing, and the owners donât follow them.
The owners expect the two maintenance staff to fix issues across all buildings with 70+ residents each, and theyâre too cheap to hire more help.
The garages were built without enough parking spaces, so two-car households are urged to sell one.
For residents, moving is not easy due to age, and they expect to move soon.
The management is poorly run.
The office staff are rude.
Time Warner Cable is not allowed.
The choice of phone/cable providers is restricted.
There are not many activities.
Very few people participate in the few activities offered.
The community room is closed periodically for bedbugs.
There are hardly any young seniors.
Review
Parkview II in Caledonia is best suited for budget-conscious seniors who value keeping living costs down and maintaining independence, even at the expense of a lean support structure. This community tends to attract residents who are comfortable managing with limited social programming and who can tolerate a management style that prioritizes occupancy and rental revenue over predictable policies. Those who require a robust activity calendar, attentive resident services, and reliable amenities should consider alternatives rather than committing here.
Conversely, families and residents who expect steady, courteous management, predictable lease terms, and a strong on-site staff should look elsewhere. The owners are described as money-focused, rushing to fill empty units and imposing rule changes after move-in, which destabilizes daily life. Maintenance is understaffed relative to the building size, leaving common repairs and resident requests to pile up while the two facility maintenance staff try to keep up. Vehicle parking is squeezed by undersized garages, complicating daily routines for households with two cars.
On the amenity and service side, the pros are scarce but not nonexistent. There are a couple of maintenance workers who are noted as friendly, offering a small buffer against broader neglect, but their efforts cannot compensate for systemic understaffing. Limited choices in cable and telephone providers restrict residents who rely on these services, and the narrow activity slate yields a tepid social climate with low participation. The result is a facility that may feel quiet and affordable, yet hollow in terms of engagement and practical conveniences.
Bedbug-related disruptions in the community room speak to ongoing maintenance and pest-control challenges, and the occasional closure further erodes the social fabric. The environment skews toward older, less active residents, with few younger seniors present, which reinforces a self-reinforcing cycle of limited programming and support. In short, the social and experiential upside is small, and the downside, pests, restricted services, and limited community life, accumulates quickly for those relying on daily routines.
For decision-makers, the critical test is whether cost savings justify the trade-offs. Prospective residents should press for concrete details: current and future lease terms, the process for rule changes, staff-to-resident ratios, and response times for repairs. They should verify whether parking allocations meet family needs, confirm which cable and internet options are actually available, and obtain a candid pest-control history and remediation plan. If the answers reveal persistent resource shortages or unstable policies, alternatives with steadier management, fuller activity calendars, and stronger customer service should be pursued.
Bottom line: Parkview II presents a stark, budget-first option that can work only for the most cost-driven seniors who value independent living over active engagement and reliable service. For anyone who values consistent management, richer social programming, better pest control, and more predictable amenities, exploring other communities is strongly advised. The decision should hinge on whether the family is comfortable accepting frequent rule changes, limited staff support, and a sparse activity environment in exchange for a lower price tag; if not, steer toward options with proven stability and a more attentive on-site team.









9 Stimulating Memory Activities for Seniors: Puzzles, Cards, and Much More
Managing Nursing Home Expenses After Medicare Coverage Ends
Is a Geriatric Care Manager the Right Choice for Your Family?