653 Woodside Road, Green Bay, WI 54311
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Angels On Humboldt Building 2 Costs & Pricing
Angels On Humboldt Building 2 offers a unique living experience with its studio apartments priced at $4,500 per month. This rate stands in contrast to the average costs found in Brown County, which sits at $3,539 for similar accommodations. Additionally, when compared to the broader state average of Wisconsin, where studio prices hover around $3,999, Angels On Humboldt's offering is notably higher. This premium may reflect enhanced amenities or services provided by the facility, catering to those seeking an elevated standard of living amidst the local housing market dynamics.
| Floor plans | Angels On Humboldt Building 2 | Brown County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $4,500 | $3,539 | $3,999 |
Overall Review of Angels On Humboldt Building 2
Pros
The nurse assigned to the grandpa was very personable and down to earth.
The nurse learned all of the familyâs names by heart.
The nurse helped make him feel at home by allowing him to hang family pictures and keepsakes.
The residence had a common room where guests could play games and talk.
The facility offered walking paths around the property for outdoor enjoyment.
The grandpa loved being outside.
The residence was maintained and managed very well.
The reviewer would strongly recommend this assisted living home.
Cons
Carrington Commons is described as a dirty facility with poor management.
The staff cannot be retained; there is high turnover and promoted managers who do not know how to care for residents.
Management allegedly drinks and parties outside of work using company funds and does not address resident concerns.
Amanda is described as treating residents poorly, with no action taken by her boss.
Ashley, the owner, is accused of partying with young management, showing no respect for staff, and not listening to concerns; the reviewer suggests Ashley should be replaced.
The reviewer would not recommend anyone to move their families into this community.
A caller reported that Ms. RodrĂguez hung up, and was unprofessional and rude.
A family member states their mom has been there less than two months and they are looking for another place.
Review
Angels On Humboldt Building 2 in Green Bay is best suited for families that can commit to rigorous due diligence and residents whose care needs are largely custodial with limited or predictable medical requirements. The community arrives in the conversation with a concerning signal: a low overall rating from a small number of reviews, suggesting that firsthand experiences vary widely and that red flags tend to surface quickly in inquiries. The practical takeaway is that this option can work only for families prepared to be highly engaged, visiting often, asking pointed questions, and demanding clear accountability from leadership and frontline staff. Those with tolerance for inconsistency should not move forward without a substantial verification process.
Families may want to consider alternatives if reliability, consistent care, and respectful treatment are non-negotiable. The strongest general warning from the surrounding feedback is that management and staffing instability undermine daily life for residents. If a communityâs leadership canât sustain adequate staffing, maintain clean facilities, and respond professionally to families, the risks to safety, comfort, and resident dignity become persistent. Prospective residents who require dependable routines, predictable communication, and quality meals should look toward options with more transparent governance, documented staffing stability, and a track record of responsive resident advocacy before making a commitment.
The observable benefits in the reviews are sparse and uneven, which means the few positive notes may reflect isolated experiences rather than a sustainable strength. A single five-star rating among otherwise critical feedback indicates that some residents or families may have had satisfactory moments, but without consistent corroboration, that signal cannot offset the broad pattern of concerns. In practical terms, this translates to a facility where potential upside, if it exists, appears fragile and highly contingent on individual staff and managers who may not be reliably in place. Families should weigh the possibility of occasional pleasant interactions against the expectation of ongoing management challenges.
Due diligence should proceed with a structured tour and information-gathering plan. Request a candid discussion with the executive director or building administrator about staffing ratios, turnover, caregiver tenure, and training programs. Review recent inspection or licensing reports and ask for a copy of the current weekly staffing schedule to compare with resident needs. Sit with current residents or families to hear about daily life, meal quality, and activity engagement. Examine the physical environment during a walk-through, hallways, cleanliness, laundry facilities, and the condition of common areas matter every day, not just when a tour is scheduled. Clarify what services are included in the base rate and what triggers additional charges.
When touring, listen for concrete evidence of accountability and responsiveness. Are complaints acknowledged promptly with clear follow-through? Is there a consistent point of contact for families, and are care plans reviewed regularly with family input? Look for signs of respect in staffâresident interactions, the availability of appropriate medical oversight, and whether activities and social opportunities align with resident interests. A clean, well-maintained dining area and a menu that reflects variety and dietary needs are non-negotiables. If any of these elements feel tentative or inconsistently addressed, treat the visit as a warning bell rather than a win.
In the end, the decision to pursue Angels On Humboldt Building 2 should rest on a clear threshold: can the facility demonstrate sustained staffing stability, transparent governance, and respectful, responsive care that meaningfully improves daily life for residents? Based on the current public feedback, families should approach with heightened scrutiny and prioritize alternatives with stronger, verifiable track records. If choosing to continue the process, insist on a formal trial period with defined milestones, a documented plan for addressing concerns, and a clear exit strategy should care needs rise or dissatisfaction persist. The prudent path is to enter with eyes open, grounded in due diligence, and ready to pivot if the experience does not meet essential standards.






Comprehending Evening Confusion in Dementia: Causes, Manifestations, and Support
Delirium and Dementia: Unraveling the Key Differences
Are Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease Lethal? A Comprehensive Exploration