Orchard Park Health and Rehabilitation Center
Save4755 South 48th Street, Tacoma, WA 98409
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
Orchard Park Health and Rehabilitation Center offers competitive pricing for its services, with semi-private rooms available at $3,500 per month and private rooms at $4,000. These rates are notably lower than the average costs in Pierce County, which stand at approximately $4,264 for a semi-private room and $4,623 for a private room. Additionally, the statewide averages reflect even higher expenses, with semi-private accommodations costing around $4,267 and private options reaching up to $4,772. This positioning makes Orchard Park an attractive choice for those seeking quality care while maintaining affordability in comparison to both county and state benchmarks.
| Floor plans | Orchard Park Health and Rehabilitation Center | Pierce County | Washington |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,500 | $4,264 | $4,267 |
| Private | $4,000 | $4,623 | $4,772 |
Orchard Park appears, in these accounts, to be a place of sharp contrasts. For every glowing mention of the people who care for residents, there is a corresponding, detailed complaint about coordination, cleanliness, or basic daily needs. Several families and patients paint a picture of a facility where the care staff - nurses, aides, and doctors - can be fantastic and compassionate, sometimes earning near-heroic praise for treating individuals with kindness and competence. One reviewer repeatedly stressed that the kitchen staff were "amazing" and went out of their way to be kind to their father, who had spent a month there and seemed to be thriving emotionally thanks to the front-line team. In another voice, a different reviewer echoed that the nursing and therapy teams could be "awesome" and that the rehab providers were often excellent, praising therapists who were competent, professional, and a joy to work with. In short, the bedside and rehab personnel are frequently lauded, and the dedication of the staff is undeniable in many instances.
But alongside these positive experiences sits a chorus of serious criticisms that center on the daily lifeblood of any long-term care facility: food, safety, cleanliness, and timely, effective care. Food service emerges as by far the most consistently troublesome area in many reviews. Several residents report meals that arrive with missing items, and there are explicit accusations that Medicare was charged for meals that did not arrive as ordered. One dinner description on 7/25 recounts a bowl of plain, dressed lettuce instead of the expected cooked vegetables, a detail that becomes symbolic of broader food-service failures. Across multiple posts, the food is described as "ATROCIOUS," "swill," or simply cold, with ongoing explanations that a kitchen plumbing problem delayed proper service and that problems persisted for weeks. In some reviews, administrators are portrayed as slow to respond or as offering generic excuses rather than concrete fixes, even as some patients acknowledge the dining team's attempts to improve after being called out.
Concerns about care extend far beyond the dining room. Several reviewers describe a lack of timely assistance with basic needs, including hygiene and personal care, with specific accounts of significant delays in help and assistive care. One patient details a night where help for personal hygiene did not arrive for hours, despite being in discomfort; another describes a room that eventually had ants and water problems, a cold water supply, and a sense that basic maintenance and cleanliness were not being prioritized. These conditions contribute to an overarching sense of a facility that, in some shifts, feels understaffed or overwhelmed, with the fear that patient needs may not be met in a timely or thorough manner.
Therapy and rehabilitation present a mixed bag as well. On the positive side, several mentions celebrate the rehab department as "top notch" or the therapists as capable and patient-centered. A reviewer notes that the therapy team, including physical therapy and a recent approach called restoration exercises, is competent and professional, with some patients even feeling hopeful about going home as their therapy progresses. On the flip side, other reviewers describe direct harm or poor collaboration: patients report rough handling during PT that left them in worse pain, a one-size-fits-all approach that ignores patient feedback, and a lack of effective occupational therapy. One account even claims that a single therapy session left them bed-bound for a week. These conflicting experiences underscore a broader impression that therapy quality may vary by unit, therapist, or day, making consistency a critical issue for families to assess.
Safety and transparency concerns recur with alarming specificity. Several reviews recount dramatic lapses in care and communication, including a catheter left in for an extended period, a pneumonia diagnosis not conveyed to family promptly, and a chest x-ray not shared with relatives. In one particularly grim account, a patient reports being told about a pneumonia result only during a casual conversation and not as part of a formal care update. Another post describes a patient who developed a potassium deficiency and an intestinal blockage after receiving putrid food, suggesting a sequence of avoidable complications that could have been mitigated with better monitoring and responsiveness. The facility is also depicted as challenging in terms of infection control and general maintenance, with ongoing plumbing problems, plugged toilets, odor issues, and a general sense of deterioration that staff did not adequately address in a timely fashion.
The staffing realities behind these experiences are part of the same story. Several reviewers emphasize extreme ratios and heavy workloads that they argue render consistent, high-quality care impossible. One resident describes a situation where there is one CNA for 16 to 21 patients, a ratio that makes it difficult for staff to be present with any single patient for meaningful periods. The resulting concerns span the spectrum from skin breakdown and bedsores to limited daily support for basic tasks. These operational pressures are not purely theoretical in the posts; families recount real consequences in terms of patient comfort, dignity, and safety, and many conclude that the facility is not equipped to manage care for all residents effectively, especially those with substantial needs.
Amid the turmoil, a thread of cautious hope runs through some posts. A handful of patients report that administration eventually engaged with their concerns - an acknowledgment that, while not solving every problem, demonstrated a willingness to listen and discuss improvements. One reviewer, later in their timeline, credits staff with improvements and notes that the therapy team is moving toward more collaborative and responsive care. There is also a sense among several commenters that, while major issues persist, there are dedicated staff members and units within Orchard Park where the patient experience is substantially better, offering a hopeful contrast to the more alarmed assessments. In a concluding note, some reviewers urge prospective families to visit with a critical eye, advocate for clear communication, and insist on seeing how issues are addressed in real time before making a decision about placement.
Taken as a whole, the collection of reviews depicts a facility with real strengths and significant vulnerabilities. The consistency of praise for bedside caregivers, nursing staff, and some therapists points to a foundation of empathy, expertise, and patient-centered care that can make a real difference in residents' lives. Yet the repeated, detailed reports of cold or missing meals, delayed assistance, questionable safety practices, maintenance problems, and severe staffing constraints paint a troubling picture of daily operations that may undermine those strengths. Families are left with a stark question: in a setting where both compassion and neglect appear in close proximity, how should a loved one be cared for? The answer, in these accounts, seems to hinge on selection of units, vigilant communication with administrators, and a clear-eyed assessment of whether the care team can balance warmth and attentiveness with consistent, reliable care, safety, and nutrition day after day.
The Orchard Park Health and Rehabilitation Center is a skilled nursing facility located in Tacoma, WA. This community offers various types of care to meet the needs of its residents.
Residents at Orchard Park have access to a range of amenities to enhance their daily living experience. Each room is fully furnished and includes cable or satellite TV, Wi-Fi/high-speed internet, and a telephone for communication purposes. There are also common areas such as a dining room and outdoor spaces for socializing and relaxing.
The care services provided at Orchard Park are comprehensive and ensure that residents receive the assistance they need. Trained staff members are available 24 hours a day to provide supervision and help with activities of daily living, including bathing, dressing, and transfers. The community also coordinates with healthcare providers to ensure residents receive appropriate medical care. In addition, medication management is available for those who require it.
Dietary needs are taken into consideration at Orchard Park, with special dietary restrictions accommodated. Meals are prepared and served on-site, offering both nutritionally balanced options as well as diabetes-specific diets.
Orchard Park strives to promote mental wellness among its residents through the provision of a mental wellness program. This includes engaging in scheduled daily activities that cater to different interests and abilities.
The location of Orchard Park provides easy accessibility to various amenities within the surrounding area. There are numerous cafes, parks, pharmacies, restaurants, places of worship, theaters, physicians' offices, and hospitals nearby. Transportation arrangements can also be made for medical appointments.
Overall, Orchard Park Health and Rehabilitation Center offers a supportive environment for individuals requiring skilled nursing care with an emphasis on providing personalized assistance while promoting independence and overall well-being.
Orchard Park Health and Rehabilitation Center offers competitive pricing for its services, with semi-private rooms available at $3,500 per month and private rooms at $4,000. These rates are notably lower than the average costs in Pierce County, which stand at approximately $4,264 for a semi-private room and $4,623 for a private room. Additionally, the statewide averages reflect even higher expenses, with semi-private accommodations costing around $4,267 and private options reaching up to $4,772. This positioning makes Orchard Park an attractive choice for those seeking quality care while maintaining affordability in comparison to both county and state benchmarks.
Orchard Park Health and Rehabilitation Center is located at 4755 South 48th Street, Tacoma, WA 98409 in Pierce County, Washington
Orchard Park Health and Rehabilitation Center on seniors.fyi includes 11 photos including images showing landscaping, interior, building, architecture, exterior, lighting, exercise equipment, office, and more.
The Village Senior Living
Tacoma, WA
Improved care and services under new management, with better meals, engaging activities, and a welcoming atmosphere.
The Village Senior Living costs
The Village Senior Living reviews
The Village Senior Living images
Compassion and Care
Tacoma, WA
Compassionate, knowledgeable staff and clean environment.
Compassion and Care costs
Compassion and Care reviews
Compassion and Care images
Cascade Park Gardens
Tacoma, WA
Caring, attentive staff in a warm, family-like community with clean facilities and engaging activities.
Cascade Park Gardens costs
Cascade Park Gardens reviews
Cascade Park Gardens images
Everlasting Care AFH
University Place, WA
Warm, personalized care in a welcoming setting.
Everlasting Care AFH costs
Everlasting Care AFH reviews
Everlasting Care AFH images
The Cottages at University Place
University Place, WA
Comprehensive care options (assisted, independent, memory care) with 24-hour supervision and memory-care programming.
The Cottages at University Place reviews
The Cottages at University Place images
Vintage at Tacoma
Tacoma, WA
Long-term resident engagement with pet-friendly amenities and on-site services.
Vintage at Tacoma costs
Vintage at Tacoma reviews
Vintage at Tacoma images
Cogir at The Narrows Tacoma Assisted Living
Tacoma, WA
Warm, attentive staff and a lively, engaged community.
Cogir at The Narrows Tacoma Assisted Living costs
Cogir at The Narrows Tacoma Assisted Living reviews
Cogir at The Narrows Tacoma Assisted Living images
Transitioning from assisted living to memory care is driven by an individual's cognitive decline and specific needs, requiring careful evaluation of indicators like increased confusion and wandering. The process involves consulting medical professionals, researching suitable communities, considering financial and legal aspects, and ensuring effective communication for personalized care plans.
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Assisted living provides moderate support for seniors seeking independence, while memory care offers specialized support for individuals with dementia or cognitive impairments through structured routines and trained staff. Key differences include care approaches, environment security measures, staff training levels, activity types, and cost considerations.
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Assisted living communities offer diverse activities beyond traditional games to enhance seniors' physical health, cognitive well-being, emotional enrichment, and social connections, including fitness classes, creative expression, and intergenerational interactions. These enriching programs foster community bonds and support residents' independence and happiness.