Normandy Park Assisted Living Costs & Pricing
Normandy Park Assisted Living offers an appealing range of pricing for its residents, particularly when compared to the broader costs in King County and the state of Washington. The monthly rates for studio apartments are significantly lower at $2,530, compared to the county's average of $4,464 and the state's average of $4,126. Similarly, their one-bedroom units at $3,250 and two-bedroom options at $3,750 remain markedly more affordable than both county and state averages. However, it's worth noting that the semi-private room rate of $7,365 stands out as considerably higher than both local and statewide benchmarks. Overall, Normandy Park presents a compelling value for those seeking assisted living accommodations while still offering choices tailored to various needs and preferences.
| Floor plans | Normandy Park Assisted Living | King County | Washington |
|---|
| Studio | $2,530 | $4,464 | $4,128 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,250 | $5,127 | $4,634 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $3,750 | $5,111 | $4,301 |
| Semi-Private | $7,365 | $4,430 | $4,272 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$470 / mo
Hummingbird Homecare
$3,000 / month
13.9 miles away
-
from +$470 / mo
Caring Adult Family Home #1
$3,000 / month
22.5 miles away
-
from +$470 / mo
Home Care in Kent Inc.
$3,000 to $3,500 / month
7.4 miles away
-
About the same
Freedom Care
$2,500 to $3,000 / month
5.8 miles away
-
from +$470 / mo
Meridian AFH II
$3,000 to $3,500 / month
10.2 miles away
Overall Review of Normandy Park Assisted Living
common
30 reviews mention this
Kind, engaged staff show up
Residents and families consistently describe staff as kind, caring, and responsive.
Many reviewers say the staff treats residents with kindness and genuine concern, and that they feel welcomed and supported day to day. Several also mention clear communication and follow-through, including keeping families informed and helping with personal needs. A few reviews raise concerns about staffing coverage and communication breakdowns, so experiences appear less consistent at certain times.
common
14 reviews mention this
Clean, safe spaces matter
Reviews repeatedly point to a clean, well-kept environment.
Across multiple reviews, families describe the community as clean, well maintained, and comfortable to visit. Several point to practical signs like rooms being kept up and a generally orderly facility, and at least one calls out feeling safe. There are also a small number of very negative reviews that contradict this (including claims about cleanliness issues), which is why itâs important to view cleanliness feedback in context.
common
12 reviews mention this
Dining gets strong and mixed reviews
Meal quality is a frequent talking point, with reports that range from great to needs improvement.
Some residents and families praise the food as great, varied, or good, and a few mention having snacks or menu variety. Others describe problems tied to turnover in the kitchen or say the food could use improvement, including one reviewer calling meals low quality. Dining shows up alongside day-to-day experience, so it can affect how people judge overall value and comfort.
common
14 reviews mention this
Activities are a highlightâbut inconsistent
Activities and outings are a frequent positive, though some reviewers want them more available.
Many reviewers say the community stays engaged with activities such as group events, exercises, and regular planned experiences, and they describe residents being encouraged to participate. Several also mention special momentsâlike staff taking extra time when someone couldnât join activitiesâadding a personal feel to the program. A recurring caveat is limited frequency or reduced activity availability at times, including during restrictions, plus some families saying they werenât kept informed about schedules.
caveat
7 reviews mention this
Staffing and communication can slip
Some reviews describe staffing and communication problems that affected access to help.
While many reviews are positive about care and communication, a separate set of reviewers report difficulty reaching office staff, doors being locked without help, or long response times for pull-cord calls. Others describe coverage gaps or communication breakdowns that lead to missed deliveries or delayed help. Taken together, the feedback suggests response reliability may vary depending on staffing levels.
common
6 reviews mention this
Location puts daily needs close
Reviewers like the location for being close to everyday options.
Several reviewers call out that the community is conveniently located for friends and family, including walking distance to restaurants and shopping. At least one mentions nearby medical and pharmacy options, which can matter for day-to-day logistics. Reviews that focus on âfitâ also suggest location was one reason they consideredâor ultimately did not chooseâthe community.
common
5 reviews mention this
Pricing feels like strong value
Several families describe the cost as manageable or good value for the care level.
A number of reviewers say the pricing is reasonable relative to what they were experiencing, including comments that it can be affordable and that the value is really good. Some compare cost expectations across communities they toured or note that it can be expensive but they have limited comparisons. There are also outlier complaints about being charged too much relative to experience, so pricing perceptions are not uniform.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.