Care Indeed - Seattle

Pros

• Indeed is described as having a cool atmosphere.
• Indeed is described as a fun place.
• Indeed is a great place to work, and it is said to truly care about helping folks get jobs.
• The ambience is great, and Indeed is seen as a great company to work for.
• Some of the best jobs the reviewer has ever had were obtained through Indeed.

Cons

• Indeed's postings are full of scammers and AI-generated ghost jobs that don't exist.
• Job seekers report never hearing back from interviewers after hundreds of applications.
• The site fails to moderate effectively, letting outdated or irrelevant ads stay up for ages.
• Recent updates made the platform harder to use, removing features and slowing the hiring process for employers.
• Employers are charged to contact resumes, with many resumes being outdated and refunds rarely available.
• Accounts can be disabled without any explanation or clear guidance.
• Support may be friendly but does not address core problems, leaving users dissatisfied.
• Some users have found cheaper, faster options (like Craigslist) in place of Indeed.
• The overall experience is described as a waste of time and money.

Review

A prevailing thread through these experiences is a deep sense of disappointment with how Indeed has evolved - and not in a good way. Once a trusted hub for finding meaningful work, the site is now described by many as a battlefield crowded with scammers, ghost postings, and AI-generated listings that aren't even real jobs. The pattern that surfaces again and again is a flood of postings that seem designed to lure applicants, only to do nothing when you actually apply. The mood is less about a productive career search and more about wading through noise, hoping to dodge scams while hoping for a legitimate opportunity that never materializes. The frustration isn't isolated to a few bad apples; it feels systemic, with the impression that the site now exists more to accentuate a company's growth narrative to investors than to connect real people with real jobs.

For job seekers, the experience has become wearing and demoralizing. The narrative of "hundreds of applications" yielding "zero responses" for over a year is not just discouraging - it's disheartening, especially for someone who has been unemployed for years and has already spent countless hours chasing openings. There's a strong sense of treading water: the more time spent on Indeed, the more one feels it's a time sink with little payoff. Some readers describe their own resilience as frayed, acknowledging that even with a polished, long-tweaked resume, the chances of hearing back have evaporated. In contrast to this grinding slump, there are occasional stories of bypassing the platform entirely - reaching out directly to a local employer and landing a job swiftly - and that contrast only amplifies the sense that Indeed has let the job market drift away from offering genuine opportunities.

A recurring problem revolves around the postings themselves. Reviewers point to jobs that are published without notice, not updated, and allowed to linger long after the position has been filled. Even when recruiters are contacted multiple times, the postings persist, suggesting a lack of timely moderation or accountability. The situation is compounded by a sense that the site doesn't effectively enforce accuracy or currency, leaving applicants to wonder whether postings are real or merely shell listings designed to draw clicks. This erosion of trust extends to the user experience on the employer side as well. The platform's changes - intended to streamline workflows or monetize postings - are described as making it harder to manage candidates, with fewer visible signals about a candidate's status or a job's true relevance.

On the employer side, the changes are equally disconcerting. A notable grievance is the experience of posting jobs and dealing with a revamped interface that seems to slow down the hiring process. Comments highlight a disconnect between what the site used to offer and what now appears: the removal of quick indicators like a "New" tag that would identify unviewed applicants, or the difficulty of accessing assessment results without opening each applicant profile. There's a perception that some features that once offered straightforward value - such as free postings or easy visibility of applicant quality - have been deprioritized or removed, replaced by a model that nudges users toward paid sponsorship. The effect, according to these accounts, is a system that feels less transparent and more transactional, with employers feeling squeezed by new rules that push them to spend more to achieve the same outcomes.

Financial friction is a pointed thread in the tapestry of complaints. One particularly sharp accusation centers on the cost of using the database: employers paying to contact resumes at a price per resume, only to find the resumes outdated or not aligned with their needs, and without refundable options when the results aren't worth the investment. The end result is a growing sense of misalignment between what a recruiter expects to get from Indeed and what the platform actually delivers. One highly cited anecdote describes a scenario where a supposed "free" posting turned into a surprise charge of hundreds of dollars, leaving a sour impression about the pricing and the transparency of fees. Taken together, these experiences feed a broader doubt about whether Indeed actually delivers good value for both job seekers and employers.

Interwoven with the negative experiences are occasional glimpses of positivity, which add a layer of complexity to the overall picture. Some entries mention a "cool atmosphere" or a "great place to work" vibe, and others speak to genuine care about helping people find jobs. A few lines hint at a company culture that's buoyant and engaging, even as the platform around it is criticized. These bright spots remind readers that, while the site's flaws are real and widespread, not every experience is uniformly negative. Still, the sentiment across many reviews leans toward frustration, skepticism, and a sense that the platform's current direction may be undercutting the very purpose it was built to serve.

In sum, the collective voice here paints a picture of a once-reliable career tool that many now view as overrun with misleading postings, unresponsive help, and a shifting business model that prioritizes paid features over practical usefulness. The consequence is a risky economy of job searching: time spent on the site increases the risk of wasted effort and disappointment, while more direct, low-friction avenues - like contacting local employers directly - appear to offer a faster path to employment for some. The overarching urge expressed is a call for better moderation, more transparent practices, and a restoration of value for both job seekers and employers, so that the platform can reclaim its former reliability rather than contribute to a sense of professional and financial drain.

This part of Seattle, Washington, offers a convenient and vibrant urban environment with easy access to pharmacies, theaters, restaurants, cafes, parks, hospitals, transportation options, and physicians. The presence of multiple pharmacies such as Bartell Drugs and Walgreens ensures that seniors have access to their medication needs close by. The proximity to theaters like AMC Pacific Place 11 and Regal Meridian & 4DX provides entertainment options for leisure activities. A variety of restaurants and cafes offer a diverse selection of dining choices ranging from Yard House to Starbucks. Parks like Space Needle Park and Seattle Center Playground provide opportunities for outdoor recreation and relaxation. Nearby hospitals include Swedish Medical Center and Harborview Medical Center for any healthcare needs. Additionally, there are transportation options such as the Seattle Center Monorail and Capitol Hill LINK Station for easy travel around the city. Physicians like Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Seattle Gastroenterology Associates are also available in the area for medical care. Overall, this part of Seattle offers a dynamic and well-connected community suitable for senior living with amenities that cater to various needs.

Pharmacies

• Bartell Drugs (0 miles)
• Walgreens (0.2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (0.2 miles)
• Bartell Drugs (0.5 miles)
• Bartell Drugs - Ebt (0.5 miles)
• Walgreens (0.6 miles)
• Bartell Drugs - Ebt (0.8 miles)

Theaters

• AMC Pacific Place 11 (0.1 miles)
• Regal Meridian & 4DX (0.2 miles)

Restaurants

• Yard House (0.1 miles)
• Elephant & Castle (0.2 miles)
• Daniel's Broiler (0.2 miles)
• Ben Paris (0.2 miles)
• Top Pot Doughnuts (0.3 miles)
• Piroshky Piroshky (0.3 miles)
• Le Panier (0.3 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (0.3 miles)
• Nana’s Green Tea (0.3 miles)
• Fulcrum Coffee (0.4 miles)
• Seattle Aquarium Cafe (0.4 miles)
• Starbucks (0.4 miles)
• La Parisienne French Bakery (0.5 miles)
• Portage Bay Cafe (0.7 miles)

Parks

• Space Needle Park (0.8 miles)
• Seattle Center Playground (0.8 miles)
• Kerry Park (1.6 miles)
• Little Howe Park (1.8 miles)
• Blue Dog Pond (2.4 miles)
• Madison Park (3 miles)

Hospitals

• Swedish Medical Center (0.8 miles)
• Harborview Medical Center (0.9 miles)
• Uw Medical Center Cafeteria (2.9 miles)

Transportation

• Seattle Center Monorail (0.8 miles)
• Capitol Hill LINK Station (0.9 miles)
• King Street Station (1 miles)
• Stadium Station (1.5 miles)
• University of Washington LINK Station (3 miles)
• Mount Baker Station (3.1 miles)

Physicians

• Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (1.2 miles)
• Queen Anne Eye Clinic (2 miles)
• Seattle Gastroenterology Associates (2.7 miles)