200 W Constance Rd, Suffolk, VA 23434
To contact a resident: (757) 539-9109
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Concordia Assisted Living - Nansemond Commons Costs & Pricing
Concordia Assisted Living - Nansemond Commons offers competitive pricing for its residents, with monthly costs reflecting the nuances of both Suffolk city and the broader state of Virginia. For those opting for a semi-private room, the cost stands at $4,461, which is slightly above the city average of $4,432 but significantly higher than the state average of $3,991. Studio accommodations are priced at $4,530, offering a more affordable alternative compared to Suffolk city's average of $5,082 while remaining competitive against Virginia's average of $4,436. For individuals seeking more privacy, private rooms are available at $5,353. While this rate is lower than Suffolk's average of $6,122, it is notably higher than the Virginia statewide average of $4,684. Overall, Concordia Assisted Living - Nansemond Commons provides varied options that cater well to different needs and preferences within the local market context.
| Floor plans | Concordia Assisted Living - Nansemond Commons | Suffolk city | Virginia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $4,461 | $4,432 | $3,991 |
| Studio | $4,530 | $5,082 | $4,436 |
| Private | $5,353 | $6,122 | $4,684 |
Overall Review of Concordia Assisted Living - Nansemond Commons
Pros
The facility smelled pleasant.
The staff are helpful and friendly.
The rooms are clean and spacious with ample closet space.
The loved one was clean, alert, and having breakfast.
Most of the food was tasty.
The other patients looked content.
Live music from a church service added to the atmosphere.
There are plenty of activities and the facility is always clean and fresh.
The community is nice and people are pleasant and friendly.
The staff was kind and informative.
Cons
The staff are hard to reach and do not return calls.
The reviewer fears that a sibling may have to return there due to financial means.
Some portions of the food arrived cold.
The distance is a drawback and there aren’t many activities offered.
The reviewer does not have a good review at this time.
Review
Concordia Assisted Living – Nansemond Commons is best suited for seniors who want a clean, welcoming, small-community environment with reliable on-site care, visible physical therapy support, and a generally warm, family-like atmosphere. The setting appeals to those who prioritize clean rooms, practical amenities, and a rhythm of activities and worship that create a sense of daily continuity. Distance can be a factor for some families, since the location may be farther from home and harder to visit frequently. Those who require highly proactive, rapid communication from the administration may want to factor in potential gaps in responsiveness, as several reviewers reported inconsistent return calls. For families weighing alternatives, Nansemond Commons offers comfort, dependable rehab services, and a cordial social vibe, but it may not deliver an expansive activity calendar or highly hands-on administrative responsiveness.
On the plus side, the residency delivers clean, spacious rooms with ample closet space, contributing to a comfortable, home-like feel that reduces the stress of moving. The facility maintains a pleasant overall ambience, and maintenance, nursing, and support staff come across as helpful and approachable in day-to-day operations. Physical therapy stands out as a meaningful, tangible benefit for residents pursuing mobility goals or rehabilitation, with perceptible progress reported by loved ones. Food quality is generally favorable, with many meals described as tasty, reinforcing a sense of livability and satisfaction around daily dining. The presence of live church services and ongoing group activities further strengthens social bonds and provides structured opportunities for engagement.
Staff credibility and the social fabric also emerge as notable strengths. Reviewers repeatedly describe staff as friendly and informative, which matters deeply for residents’ sense of dignity and trust. The community appears to be well-kept and clean, reinforcing an impression of safety and attentiveness. The combination of a well-maintained environment and regular programming, coupled with a respectful, pleasant vibe, helps residents feel content and teams feel capable of meeting routine care needs. For families seeking a calm, predictable routine with moderate social interaction, Nansemond Commons delivers consistently on those fronts.
Yet the experience is not without clear drawbacks. A recurring issue is difficulty contacting staff and delays in returning calls, undermining confidence for families that rely on timely updates about a loved one’s condition. Several reviewers also noted that the activity calendar isn’t as robust as hoped, leaving some residents with fewer daily engagement options than expected. A few comments referenced distance or transportation challenges, which can complicate regular visits or participation in off-campus events. Financial considerations also appeared in user feedback, indicating the need for careful budgeting and transparent expectations about what is included in the monthly cost.
These cons must be weighed against the proven strengths. The peace of mind offered by a clean, comfortable environment, visible rehab services, and a warm social setting can offset occasional communication friction for families who take a proactive role in coordinating care and supplementing programming with personal visits or family-led activities. The on-site rehab program and church-connected social life are meaningful anchors for residents who value functional mobility gains and stable social routines. However, for families prioritizing rapid administrative responsiveness, a broad, daily activity spectrum, or proximity-driven involvement, Nansemond Commons may fall short relative to some peers.
In practical terms, the decision hinges on three questions: Is dependable, timely communication a top requirement? Is the combination of a tidy, peaceful environment, solid rehab services, and faith-based social life sufficient? How important is a robust, diverse activities calendar and closer family involvement on a daily basis? If the answers favor comfort, steady rehabilitation, and a community tone with regular, church-adjacent programming, Nansemond Commons stands up well as a credible choice. If the priority is high-frequency programming, brisk administrative responsiveness, or very close family engagement, it may be prudent to explore alternatives within the same market that emphasize those strengths. The right fit will align capabilities with the resident’s needs and the family’s expectations for ongoing communication, activity, and care.













Is Assisted Living Deductible on Your Taxes? Understanding the Complexities of Assisted Living Expenses and Deductions
Assisted Living Support for Veterans: A Complete and Detailed Overview
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing
