39705 Wenner Road, Lovettsville, VA 20180
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Woodland Assisted Living Costs & Pricing
Woodland Assisted Living presents a competitive pricing structure for its residents when compared to both Loudoun County and the broader state of Virginia. For a semi-private room, Woodland's monthly cost of $2,950 significantly undercuts the county's average of $4,642 and even offers more affordability than the state average of $3,991. Similarly, for those seeking a studio apartment, Woodland's rate of $4,950 remains lower than Loudoun County's $5,590, while also being slightly above the Virginia statewide average of $4,436. This positioning reflects Woodland Assisted Living's commitment to providing quality care at accessible prices within a supportive community environment.
| Floor plans | Woodland Assisted Living | Loudoun County | Virginia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,950 | $4,642 | $3,991 |
| Studio | $4,950 | $5,590 | $4,436 |
Overall Review of Woodland Assisted Living
Pros
The staff are caring and kind.
Frank and Shauna Hyatt are lovely people.
The home is very clean and bright.
The setting is beautiful and feels more like a home than a facility.
Reviewers described it as the best home they saw, with friendly people and nice rooms.
It was praised for its home-like atmosphere rather than an institutional one.
Cons
The people are stuffed into every nook & cranny in this run down house.
The staff has no education on Alzheimer's.
The patients sit in a living room all day with the TV on.
There are maybe two full bathrooms for all patients.
The owners and staff are not educated or equipped to handle Alzheimer's.
This is NOT a memory care center by any means.
There are no formal activities; residents mostly sit in a small living room staring at the TV.
The place appears unkempt; the wallpaper, carpet, and linoleum look old and not very clean.
Review
Woodland Assisted Living in Lovettsville is best suited for seniors who want a down-to-basics, home-like setting and can function with limited supervision and no specialized memory-care programming. It caters to residents who can navigate stairs, share compact living spaces, and do not require a formal, institution-like environment. For families with a modest budget who prioritize a cozy, family-style atmosphere over clinical polish, this community can feel like a reasonable compromise, so long as memory impairment is not a central issue and safety needs are modest.
That said, anyone caring for a loved one with Alzheimer's or significant memory loss should seriously consider alternatives. The property and operation are not equipped as a memory-care facility, with multiple reviews describing a lack of dementia-specific training, structured activities, and appropriate supervision. Prospective residents with cognitive challenges, wandering tendencies, or escalating care needs will find this setting ill-suited and potentially unsafe, as staffing ratios and programing do not meet the demands of memory care.
On the plus side, several accounts highlight a genuine sense of care from staff who are described as kind and attentive, and the setting can feel cleaner and brighter than a typical institutional environment. The small scale, roughly 15 residents at a time, contributes to a homey vibe that some families value more than a formal facility. When families prioritize a nonclinical atmosphere and a comfortable, family-style daily routine, these elements can feel like meaningful positives.
Yet the drawbacks are substantial and repeatedly documented. The home operates with a tight staffing ratio (reported around 2 staff for a dozen-plus residents in some descriptions), which translates into limited supervision and engagement. The space itself is cramped, with a single small bathroom serving many residents and bedrooms that are accessed by stairs rather than elevators. The building is not clearly upgraded for accessibility, and the lack of ADA modifications or elevator access can create real daily barriers for residents with mobility or safety needs. The absence of consistent activities, beyond occasional sing-alongs or ad hoc visits, leaves caregiving more about watching and cleaning than purposeful engagement.
The key tension is clear: the pros of a warm, intimate home environment and genuinely caring staff can be appealing, but they fail to offset the most critical needs for many seniors. For a resident who is independent or only lightly assisted, and whose family can tolerate occasional gaps in programming and mobility challenges, Woodland may work. For anyone with memory impairment, significant supervision requirements, or expectations of a structured activity calendar and dementia-trained staff, the cons overwhelmingly dominate.
The practical takeaway is decisive. For memory care, or for families seeking guaranteed safety, escalation protocols, and ADA-compliant accessibility, alternatives, especially dedicated memory-care communities or larger assisted living facilities with certified dementia units, make more sense. Even during tours, prospective families should probe staffing levels, memory-care capabilities, availability of elevator access, bathroom ratio, and the specific daily activities offered. If those elements cannot be clearly demonstrated and documented, the recommendation is to look elsewhere. Woodland can satisfy a very particular preference for a home-like, low-key setting with modest costs, but it is not the right fit for dementia care or for residents requiring reliable, high-touch supervision and accessibility.










Are Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease Lethal? A Comprehensive Exploration
Exploring the Power of Reminiscence Therapy for Individuals With Dementia
An In-Depth Look at Reminiscence Therapy in Dementia Care