1804 Martinique Drive, Arlington, TX 76012
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
The Guardian Costs & Pricing
The costs associated with The Guardian present a competitive edge when compared to both Tarrant County and the broader Texas market. For semi-private rooms, The Guardian's monthly rate of $2,750 significantly undercuts the county average of $3,889 and the state's average of $3,680, highlighting an attractive option for those seeking affordability without compromising on quality care. Similarly, the private room rate at The Guardian is priced at $3,000, offering substantial savings against Tarrant County's $3,704 and Texas' average of $4,096. These figures emphasize The Guardian's commitment to providing cost-effective living arrangements while fostering a supportive environment for its residents.
| Floor plans | The Guardian | Tarrant County | Texas |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,750 | $3,889 | $3,680 |
| Private | $3,000 | $3,704 | $4,096 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$250 / mo
My Family Care Home I
$3,000 to $3,500 / month21.0 miles away -
from +$250 / mo
Professional Care Facility 3
$3,000 to $4,000 / month19.0 miles away -
from -$250 / mo
Halo Residential Care Homes
$2,500 to $3,000 / month8.3 miles away -
from +$99 / mo
Lewisville Estates
$2,849 to $7,500 / month20.8 miles away -
About the same
B & Y Care Home
$2,800 to $4,000 / month23.0 miles away
Overall Review of The Guardian
Pros
Marie lovingly cares for the seniors in her home.- Her care home is comforting, personal, and state-licensed.
- Marie is an attentive, God-loving professional.
- She has an open door and welcomes family visits.
- People have referred seniors to her assisted living.
Cons
A rude lady answered the phone, which felt unprofessional.- The call seemed to treat the facility’s number as a personal line rather than a business contact.
- The signage at the front door was unclear, causing confusion about the facility.
- The remainder of the home was cluttered and off-putting, despite the living room being tidy.
- The rooms were sparsely furnished and looked shabby, like dorm rooms.
- A guardian allegedly boasted about beating people, which was alarming and inappropriate.
- The absence of a printed financial sheet for base pay and care costs was noted as a drawback.
Review
This community is best suited for families seeking a truly home-like, intimate setting where a small, hands-on operator delivers personal, relational care for seniors who don’t require advanced medical oversight but value warmth, faith, and easy family access. It works well for residents who thrive on a close-knit, caregiver-led environment and for families who prioritize a genuine, open line of communication with the person running the home. Those seeking a polished, large-scale facility with formal programming should look elsewhere.
The strongest positives lie in the caregiving relationship and the sense of ownership. The operator, described as attentive and devout, has earned referrals and is praised for a caring, open-door approach that invites family involvement. State licensing provides a baseline of regulatory compliance, and testimonials speak to individualized attention and a warm, personal atmosphere. In a setting this small, residents can feel heard, and weekly or daily interactions tend to be more substantive than in busier, institutional environments. When these elements click, families experience peace of mind about daily care and relationship quality.
However, significant drawbacks undercut those advantages. The physical footprint is limited and uneven: the main activity and dining space is a converted garage, with other areas described as cluttered or sparsely furnished, giving a dorm-like impression that clashes with expectations for dignity and comfort in a living space. This environment constrains social programming and can leave guests with a sense that there isn’t room for diverse activities or gatherings. In practice, its charm can feel compromised by space constraints, which makes it harder to host guests comfortably or expand programming as needs evolve.
Staff access and front-end communications also present ongoing challenges. Reports of a busy caregiver during visits suggest inconsistent staffing presence, and a well-intentioned but imperfect first impression, an apparently curt phone encounter, signals gaps in professional front-office communication. Signage at the entrance sometimes fails to clearly convey who runs the place or what services are being offered, which can create confusion for prospective residents and their families during initial contact. These issues don’t negate the care offered, but they do diminish reliability and predictability, two pillars families normally count on in choosing care.
Cost transparency emerges as a concrete sticking point. A clear, printed sheet outlining base rates and levels of care was repeatedly requested but not readily provided in at least one experience, prompting a cautious, “cross this off the list” reaction. In a decision where monthly budgets are a major consideration, the absence of upfront pricing details makes it hard to compare value against alternatives. This is not a minor quibble; it’s a practical barrier that will push families toward facilities with clear, itemized pricing and a straightforward pathway to understanding what is included.
In sum, The Guardian represents a compelling option for those who prize personal, faith-forward caregiving in a compact, home-like setting and can tolerate a modest environment with limited common spaces. It is less suited for families who require abundant programming, spacious, salon-like living areas, and rock-solid front-d desk professionalism or for those who insist on transparent, readily available pricing. Pros offset the main drawbacks only if the family values intimate, caregiver-driven attention and is comfortable navigating a few operational rough edges; otherwise, exploring larger, more structured alternatives is prudent. Prospective residents should demand a formal cost sheet, arrange visits at multiple times to gauge consistency, and verify staff coverage before making a final commitment.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Respite Care
Activities off-site
Beautician on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private
Private bathrooms
Telephone
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Dallas-Fort Worth International (10 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs