3048 Long Hollow Pike, Hendersonville, TN 37075
To contact a resident: (615) 824-6889
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Long Hollow Terrace Costs & Pricing
Long Hollow Terrace offers a competitive pricing structure for its studio apartments, with a monthly cost of $1,800. When compared to the broader market - Sumner County and the state of Tennessee - this price represents a significant savings. In Sumner County, the average monthly cost for similar accommodations reaches $3,714, while in Tennessee as a whole, it is approximately $3,485. This positioning not only highlights Long Hollow Terrace's value proposition but also emphasizes its commitment to providing affordable housing options without compromising on quality or services.
| Floor plans | Long Hollow Terrace | Sumner County | Tennessee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $1,800 | $3,714 | $3,485 |
Overall Review of Long Hollow Terrace
Pros
They have a special floor for Alzheimer's residents with a locked door.
The presence of a locked door on the Alzheimer's floor indicates safety-focused design.
The facility offers an Alzheimer’s-specific space, suggesting tailored care.
Cons
They could not keep his dad from getting outside on a busy road.
He was not watched closely enough, so he went out as someone was coming in.
The incidents happened at least three times, forcing his family to remove him.
Review
Long Hollow Terrace in Hendersonville, TN, is best suited for families seeking a small, memory-care–oriented assisted living option that centers on a dedicated Alzheimer's floor with locked access. The environment appeals to those who want a more intimate, home-like setting and can tolerate a measured level of supervision within a secured area. It fits residents who are relatively stable day-to-day but facing early-stage memory challenges, where the goal is to minimize wandering risk while preserving some independence in a controlled space. It is not the right fit for those requiring high-acuity care, constant, watchful oversight, or robust medical intervention; in those cases, alternatives with stronger care capabilities should be explored.
Safety is anchored in the locked Alzheimer’s floor, but a troubling safety gap emerges in practice. The experience shared shows a resident able to exit onto a busy road multiple times even as someone was entering, highlighting supervision gaps beyond the locked doors. The core issue is not the existence of a secured unit but the real-time monitoring of entrances and exits. Families must factor in whether staff coverage, security protocols, and wandering-management plans are robust enough to intercept and redirect an at-risk resident before dangerous exits occur. The Alzheimer’s floor is a meaningful pro, yet it only matters if daily operations align with the resident’s risk profile.
Key pros, notably the dedicated memory-care environment, offset some risk by confining wander-worthy behavior to a secured zone, potentially reducing incidents compared with non-secured settings. The intimate size of the community can translate into more personalized attention when staffing is consistent. However, the reported lapses underscore a mismatch between the facility’s designed protection and actual day-to-day execution. The effectiveness of a locked-floor strategy hinges on disciplined entry/exit monitoring, timely caregiver alerts, and well-trained staff who can address wandering alarms with urgency. Without those, the dedicated floor becomes a partial hedge rather than a fail-safe. We weigh that reality carefully for families facing this decision.
To make an informed choice, insist on concrete demonstrations of safety protocols: staff-to-resident ratios during peak hours, wandering-recovery procedures, door-sensor audits, and incident-tracking transparency. Ask for details on how exits are secured during shift changes, how quickly alarms trigger, and what on-site interventions exist to re-route a resident who heads for the door. Request a written wandering plan tailored to the loved one’s routines, plus references from other families about safety outcomes. Also probe whether the Alzheimer's floor receives specialized memory-care staff training and ongoing supervision beyond routine care. From our perspective, families should demand these specifics to gauge whether the practical safeguards keep pace with the theoretical protections.
Alternatives deserve consideration for families prioritizing safety and seamless supervision. Other communities with higher staff-to-resident ratios, more comprehensive wandering protocols, 24/7 security staffing, or larger campuses may offer greater reassurance to families facing frequent exit attempts. If cost is a significant factor, Long Hollow Terrace can still be competitive, but the trade-off should be weighed against the risk tolerance and the loved one’s behavior profile. We encourage families to compare environments that demonstrate a track record of consistent wandering-management success, particularly for residents with a high tendency to wander.
Bottom line: Long Hollow Terrace serves a niche audience, those who want a small, memory-care-focused setting with a locked-floor option and are comfortable with a potentially less robust daily oversight. For residents prone to wandering or needing continuous, aggressive supervision, alternatives with stronger safety infrastructure are advisable. If the decision leans toward Long Hollow Terrace, pursue a formal, documented safety plan, insist on transparency around staffing and incident history, and arrange a trial period to observe how promptly the team responds to doors and alarms. A clear path to secure memory care hinges on prioritized, verifiable procedures aligned with the loved one’s needs, and that alignment should drive the final choice.








Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration
Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview
Social Security Benefits and Assisted Living: Navigating Options Across the U.S.