572 Dover Road, Suite A, Clarksville, TN 37042
To contact a resident: (931) 542-6348
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Big Hearts at Home Care - Clarksville, TN
Pros
They are a very professional company.
They have wonderful, caring staff.
They are flexible and accommodating, even for last-minute requests.
They provide a warm and welcoming environment for loved ones.
Their caregiver is outstanding.
They are highly recommended by clients.
The owner is professional, caring, and sympathetic.
Big Hearts at Home provides amazing care for clients' family members.
Cons
They say Big Hearts should vet their staff more thoroughly.
They say Big Hearts should not place an unfit caregiver in someoneâs home.
They say it is a problem when a worker neglects the client and fails to check on them.
They say Big Hearts does not tell the truth about what happened when video chats were used.
They say Big Hearts defends the caregiver.
They believe the company should be closed down and that Big Hearts is not a good company.
They describe the caregiver as crazy.
They claim the caregiver walked away from their family member in a store, leaving her alone.
Review
Big Hearts at Home Care in Clarksville is best suited for families seeking warm, relationship-driven in-home support that keeps a loved one at home with flexible, personally attentive caregiving. The service model centers on compassionate staff who build real connections, practical guidance for daily tasks, and the ability to adapt scheduling to lastâminute needs. This agency is a strong fit for seniors who value a home-like environment, want caregivers who are professional and engaged, and are comfortable with ongoing communication from leadership about how care is delivered.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are families facing needs that go beyond what in-home care typically provides. If 24/7 medical oversight, highly structured routines, or a tightly controlled environment with constant credentialing scrutiny are top priorities, a facility-based option or a different agency with more formalized supervision may be a better match. A single negative review highlights the importance of clear staffing oversight and reliability; for families with significant safety concerns or a history of problematic staff experiences, itâs prudent to explore options with more explicit, documented accountability and backup plans.
The strongest pros here are hard to overlook: notably, the staffâs professionalism and genuine care, paired with a welcoming, warm atmosphere that families repeatedly praise. Families report caregivers who go above and beyond, with trainers who teach practical, safe methods for helping a loved one without causing strain or injury. The ownerâs involvement is a recurring theme in positive feedback, described as knowledgeable, sympathetic, and willing to tailor care to individual needs. Flexibility stands out as a distinguishing feature, including responsiveness to last-minute requests and a willingness to adjust plans to fit changing circumstances. When care hinges on personal rapport and hands-on assistance, these factors can translate into meaningful improvements in a seniorâs daily experience and peace of mind for relatives.
Yet there is a meaningful caveat reflected in the negative note: a reviewer questioned staffing reliability and alleged dishonesty in reporting incidents, signaling that gaps in supervision or inconsistencies in caregiver performance can occur. While the volume of positive experiences dwarfs this single critique, the absence of documented processes in the reviews for background checks, ongoing supervisor visits, and grievance handling means potential clients must do due diligence. The risk here is not a universal failure but a real possibility that care quality can hinge on individual caregivers and on how the agency monitors and addresses trouble spots. This is not a reason to dismiss the option, but it is a reason to demand clarity before committing.
In weighing pros against cons, the practical takeaway is clear: the benefits of a deeply personal, adaptable home-care arrangement are substantial if paired with solid oversight. Families should insist on concrete assurances about supervision, caregiver matching, continuity of care, and a defined plan for back-up coverage. Ask for caregiver profiles, a clear escalation protocol, regular supervision visit schedules, and a transparent process for reporting concerns. Request a trial period with defined expectations, and seek references from several families with similar needs. Ensure clarity on billing, cancellation, and how last-minute changes are handled to avoid slipstreams of confusion.
Overall, Big Hearts at Home Care offers a compelling option for Clarksville families seeking compassionate, home-based care with a responsive leadership presence. The model works best when trust is built through consistent caregiver performance and proactive supervision, paired with the flexibility that helps families manage evolving needs. If comfort with a personal, home-oriented approach is the priority and a strong clinician oversight plan can be verified, this agency can deliver meaningful, dignified support for a loved one. If the priority shifts toward rigid, facility-grade structure and ironclad guarantees around every shift, exploring alternatives remains a prudent step.









6 Crucial Ways an Elder Law Attorney Assists Families
Navigating the Tax Landscape of Caregiving: Credits, Deductions, and Beyond
Highly Beneficial Low-Impact Exercises for Senior Living Residents