130 North Sycamore, Sioux Falls, SD 57110
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Meadows On Sycamore II
Pros
It truly is an amazing place that cares and treats your loved ones like their own.
The residents became family to her.
Most staff are pleasant.
The people care!
Cons
The facility is dirty, understaffed, and overpriced.
The food is terrible, especially considering the $3,900 cost.
The grandmotherâs belongings went missing under suspicious circumstances, and she was verbally abused by staff.
She was treated like a burden rather than a person.
They charge extra for a third bath within a week.
Do not take your loved ones here.
Nursing care is unacceptable; management doesnât communicate well and the facility is very short-staffed.
There isnât any housekeeper; the facility is understaffed, and there are bed bugs that arenât being fixed.
Review
Meadows On Sycamore II in Sioux Falls is best suited for families that are prepared to supervise daily care very closely and accept a reality of significant staffing and cleanliness challenges. The community is not appropriate for seniors who rely on steady, professional nursing support, consistent housekeeping, and predictable safety standards. This is a setting where oversight must be constant, questions must be asked relentlessly, and billing practices should be scrutinized with diligence. For many families, that means treating Meadows On Sycamore II as a last-resort option only after exploring stronger, more transparent alternatives in the area.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are clear: anyone who prioritizes reliable care, respectful treatment, and a clean, well-maintained environment should look elsewhere. If cleanliness, regular staffing, and transparent, proactive management matter, this is not the facility to entrust with a loved one. Even with limited options, there are nearby communities that deliver steadier nurse and aide coverage, better housekeeping, and fewer questions about safety. For households with the ability to choose, a different facility with higher staffing ratios, documented care plans, and consistent handling of medications is a prudent default.
The brightest spots in the Meadows On Sycamore II picture are occasional staff members who genuinely care and the sense of connections that can form between residents and caregivers. Unfortunately, these positives are overwhelmed by a pattern of understaffing and fragmented communication that sabotages day-to-day quality. When a single aide is attempting to supervise dozens of residents, responsive care becomes inconsistent, and critical tasks, medication administration, monitoring for changes in condition, timely assistance, fall through the cracks. The presence of caring individuals does not compensate for the systemic gaps that turn care from reliable to reactive.
Environment and safety emerge as the dominant concerns. Recurrent complaints about dirt, insufficient housekeeping, and infestations, bed bugs cited in multiple accounts, paint a picture of an inhospitable living space. The overall cleanliness issue is not incidental; it signals broader risks to health and well-being, especially for residents with limited mobility or compromised immune systems. Compounding this, management communication is described as poor, and requests for remediation or clear explanations about care plans are often met with hesitation or delay. In short, the setting feels unstable, and the risk calculus tilts toward caution rather than comfort.
From a value perspective, the price tag matters because it sets expectations. At roughly $3,900 per month with added charges for extra services like a third bath within a week, the market demands a higher standard of care, transparency, and accountability. When the outcomes described by residents and families point toward inconsistent service, safety concerns, and questions about how funds are deployed, the financial argument collapses. A care environment that strains under staffing pressures and maintenance backlogs cannot be justified by a nominally convenient location or a single relieved family memberâs positive experience.
Decision-makers should approach Meadows On Sycamore II with a structured due diligence plan. Start with a candid tour focused on staffing: ask for current nurse-to-resaid ratios on each shift, the process for escalating concerns, and real-time examples of how care plans are updated. Inspect the living spaces for cleanliness, evidence of pest control efforts, and daily housekeeping routines. Request copies of recent incident reports, medication administration policies, and any resident rights documentation that governs abuse prevention and response. Probe the billing practices to confirm what is included in the base rate and what triggers extra charges, and verify the facilityâs plan for rectifying documented deficiencies. Finally, talk with current residents and family members about their day-to-day experiences, not just the glossy representations, to gauge whether the environment truly supports dignity, safety, and consistent, compassionate care.
If Meadows On Sycamore II remains under consideration after this due diligence, frame expectations around ongoing advocacy. Families should plan for frequent, structured check-ins, formalized care plan reviews, and rapid escalation paths for any decline in safety or comfort. In parallel, compare multiple options with stronger staffing, cleaner environments, and pricing that reflects the level of service delivered. The contrast will be stark: the best choice offers dependable care, respectful treatment, and a transparent path to accountability; Meadows On Sycamore II, in its current pattern, invites risk and requires an extraordinary level of family involvement to make even modest quality achievable.








Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide