Carriage House Senior Lvg Costs & Pricing
Carriage House Senior Living offers competitive pricing for its residents, especially when compared to the average costs in Greenville County and across South Carolina. For a semi-private room, the monthly fee is $1,750, significantly lower than the county's average of $3,157 and the state average of $3,243. Similarly, their one-bedroom option is priced at $2,450, which again stands out against Greenville's average of $3,882 and South Carolina's average of $3,806. This strong value proposition reflects Carriage House Senior Living's commitment to providing affordable housing options without compromising on quality care and comfort for seniors.
| Floor plans | Carriage House Senior Lvg | Greenville County | South Carolina |
|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,750 | $3,157 | $3,243 |
| 1 Bedroom | $2,450 | $3,882 | $3,806 |
Overall Review of Carriage House Senior Lvg
differentiator
4 reviews mention this
Cost and Medicaid affordability stand out
Pricing is described as extremely reasonable and affordable in multiple reviews.
Several families and residentsā references describe Carriage House Senior Lvg as a good fit for a smaller budget. Reviews also mention Medicaid acceptance and describe costs as lower than what the family saw elsewhere. Pricing support shows up alongside residents being able to live there at more accessible rates, rather than stretching budgets.
common
16 reviews mention this
Staff relationships feel family-like
Many reviewers describe staff who treat residents like family.
Across reviews, residents and families often write that the staff is warm, friendly, professional, and supportive. Even in the negative management reviews, commenters say employees try to care for residents as best they can. Multiple accounts also describe the environment as secure and safe alongside positive day-to-day interactions.
caveat
3 reviews mention this
Food quality is inconsistent
Dining reviews range from average to strongly negative about meal quality.
Some reviews criticize the food, describing meals as unappetizing and sometimes lacking basics. Other reviewers who visited or had a short stay describe the food as good some days and average other days, with options to choose from. Taken together, dining appears to vary enough that itās worth asking what meals look like during a typical week.
caveat
7 reviews mention this
Cleanliness and odors divide opinions
Reviews mention both a clean feel and noticeable odor or worn conditions.
Some families describe the facility as well kept, clean, and not having foul smells when they toured or when a loved one lived there. Others report concerns such as urine odor being obvious and the facility looking worn out. Even when staff and care are praised, these condition comments suggest residents and visitors may want to look closely at day-to-day cleanliness before deciding.
common
3 reviews mention this
Activities and structured programs get mention
Residentsā routines include activities and daytime programming, according to multiple reviews.
Several reviews describe activities that include outings and programs running through the day. One reviewer also notes the community previously had transportation for doctors and an activity bus, but says those services were no longer provided. Overall, activities are discussed as a meaningful part of life, but transportation may vary by period or availability.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Rent reimbursement disputes raise concerns
Some families report unresolved billing and reimbursement problems after leaving.
Two reviewers describe a move-out period where they say the community refused to reimburse an expected rent balance. They also mention alleged invoicing errors and difficulties getting responses by email during the dispute. Because these comments are specific to reimbursements after moving out, prospective residents may want to clarify billing and reimbursement handling in writing up front.
differentiator
4 reviews mention this
Medication handling is a major theme
Medication support is described both positively and negatively in reviews.
One reviewer describes their family member receiving psychiatric medications as needed and prescribed, linking it to quality of life. Other reviews report medication-related problems, including prescriptions going missing and families having to manage medications themselves to cover gaps. A tour review also mentions feeling good because there was a licensed RN on site. Together, residentsā medication experience appears to be a key decision point.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.