Cabading Homes #2

Pros

• The reviewers express hope that conditions will improve and residents' well-being will be prioritized.
• They value clearer communication from leadership to families about residents' progress.
• They want decisive action to address safety concerns, cleanliness, and overall facility conditions.
• They advocate for better oversight and accountability to ensure residents receive appropriate care.
• They believe that improvements in management and facilities could lead to a higher quality of care.

Cons

• The facility has too many residents per room and space is too small.
• It is a breeding ground for COVID and flu.
• The facility is in need of an exterminator.
• There are constant complaints from a family member.
• There is no leader or manager communicating with the family about residents' progress, decline, medicine changes, pain, or injuries.
• The place is disgusting and the living conditions are horrible for the money paid by the state.
• The Governor seems more concerned with food stamps than facilities like Canading Homes.

Review

A troubling picture emerges from a set of strongly worded concerns about Canading Homes. The speaker paints a facility where basic standards of care and living conditions are repeatedly called into question, spanning mental health suitability, overcrowding, sanitation, and the quality of oversight. The core message is urgent and uncompromising: something has to change because the current situation is not acceptable for the people who live and receive care there.

The most immediate issue highlighted is overcrowding. The reviewer points to "too many per room" and a space that is "too small," suggesting that residents don't have enough privacy or room to move safely. This overcrowding is framed as more than just uncomfortable - it is described as detrimental to well-being, especially for individuals who may need quiet, personal space, or a calm environment to manage mental health conditions. The implication is that the physical layout of the facility directly undermines the quality of care and daily life for its residents.

Closely tied to the space problem is a concern about infection control and disease risk. The reviewer harshly labels the environment a "COVID/flu breeding ground," signaling fears that the combination of high density, shared rooms, and perhaps inconsistent cleaning or ventilation creates fertile ground for outbreaks. In a setting where residents may have compromised health, this risk is presented as not just inconvenient but dangerous, with families and residents left worried about preventable illness spreading among vulnerable people.

Pest and sanitation issues are also raised as a major problem. Describing the facility as "in need of exterminator" implies persistent pest concerns that could compromise sanitation, dignity, and overall health. The absence of timely pest control can exacerbate odors, contaminate food and surfaces, and undermine residents' sense of safety and cleanliness in a place that is already under scrutiny for its living conditions.

Communication and leadership are criticized as systemic failures. The review notes "constant complaints from family member" and, perhaps most troubling, that there is "no leader or manager communicates with family on residents progress, decline, medicine changes, pain, or injuries." This lack of transparent, regular communication about a resident's health, changes in treatment, or incidents can erode trust, hinder family involvement, and leave families feeling powerless and uninformed about the care their loved ones are receiving.

A broader critique centers on funding and political priorities. The reviewer claims, "for the amount of money they're paid by the state the living conditions are horrible," suggesting a misalignment between funding and outcomes. This line of argument frames the issue not only as a matter of facility management but as a matter of accountability to taxpayers who support the state's investment in long-term care. It raises questions about efficiency, stewardship, and the adequacy of oversight to ensure that resources translate into real improvements in residents' daily lives.

Finally, the critique broadens to a political call for action. The reviewer contrasts the focus of political leaders, saying, "The Governor is worried about people and their food stamps he should be paying attention to facilities like Canading Homes." This remark reframes the issue as a matter of public policy and governance, urging elected officials to direct attention and resources toward the facilities that serve some of the most vulnerable populations. It underscores a demand for accountability at a systemic level, not just isolated fixes at a single location.

Taken together, the remarks present a multi-faceted indictment of Canading Homes as it stands. The central thread is that overcrowding, inadequate infection control, pest problems, poor communication, and questions about funding and oversight create a troubling ecosystem for residents, particularly those with mental health needs. The voice calling for change emphasizes that improvements are not optional but essential, pointing to a need for structural reforms, better leadership, clearer lines of communication with families, and more effective use of resources to ensure safer, cleaner, and more dignified living conditions for residents.

This part of North Charleston, South Carolina, offers a convenient and accessible location with a variety of amenities nearby. There are several physicians, pharmacies, and hospitals in close proximity, making it easy to access medical care when needed. Additionally, there are a range of dining options including local restaurants and familiar chains. Places of worship are also available for spiritual fulfillment. Parks provide opportunities for outdoor recreation and relaxation. The Charleston International Airport is nearby for travel convenience. Overall, this area provides a well-rounded environment for senior living with essential services and recreational opportunities within reach.

Physicians

• Charleston ENT & Allergy (1.4 miles)
• Pediaric Gastroenterology and Liver Disease (2.7 miles)
• Palmetto Family Care (3.3 miles)
• Palmetto Primary Care Physicians (4.1 miles)
• Harold Dr - Nicolette Harold R Dr Nicolette DO (4.2 miles)
• Family First Medical Care (4.5 miles)
• West Ashley Family Medicine (4.5 miles)

Restaurants

• The Junction Kitchen & Provisions (1.4 miles)
• Jackrabbit Filly (1.6 miles)
• The Mill (1.8 miles)
• McDonald's (2.2 miles)
• Bonefish Grill (2.3 miles)
• Zaxby's (2.5 miles)
• Golden Corral (2.7 miles)

Pharmacies

• Kerr Drug (1.5 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (2.7 miles)
• Walgreens (3.5 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (3.9 miles)
• Walgreens (4.2 miles)
• Walgreens (4.3 miles)

Places of Worship

• North Charleston United Methodist Church (1.7 miles)
• The Revelation of Christ Church (3.3 miles)
• Greek Orthodox Church of the Holy Trinity (4.4 miles)

Parks

• Hampton Park Dog Run (3.9 miles)
• Governers Park (4.5 miles)
• Brittlebank Park (4.8 miles)
• West Ashley Park (5.3 miles)

Transportation

• Charleston International Airport (CHS) (3.9 miles)
• Baggage Claim (3.9 miles)
• Charleston Visitor Center Bus Shed (5.2 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (4.3 miles)
• The Daily (4.6 miles)
• Sightsee (4.7 miles)
• Babas on Cannon (4.9 miles)
• Panera Bread (5.1 miles)

Hospitals

• Bon Secours St Francis Hospital (4.9 miles)
• Medical University of South Carolina (5.2 miles)
• MUSC Ashley River Tower (5.2 miles)
• Roper St Francis Foundation (5.2 miles)
• Musc Shawn Jenkins Children's Hospital (5.3 miles)
• Emergency Department, Roper Hospital (5.3 miles)