207 East Shockley Ferry Road, Anderson, SC 29624
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Resting Place 1
Pros
The residents seemed happy.
The employees seemed happy.
The owner was very open and provided more information about how assisted living works than anybody the reviewer talked to.
The staff was great.
The staff expressed confidence that the mom would love it there.
Cons
The facility needs help with its aesthetic properties.
The house looks really old and needs remodeling.
The flooring was not leveled; it had three or four different floors.
The carpets and the rest of the stuff smelled like disinfectants, and the smell was very strong.
The facility smelled strongly, especially in the commodes.
The facility looked horrible, and the furniture was horrible.
It was heartbreaking to see the condition those residents were living in.
The rooms were not well-decorated; the decor looked dated and uninviting.
The facility could trigger an asthma attack for someone with asthma.
Review
Resting Place 1 in Anderson, SC is best suited for families that value hands-on, attentive staff and open, informative dialogue with the facilityâs leadership, even when the physical environment is clearly aging and undergoing remodeling. The care team appears kind and engaged, and residents seem content with daily life there. This community can work well for someone who prioritizes personal attention and consistent, approachable communication over pristine interiors or showroom decor.
Conversely, those who require up-to-date aesthetics, neutral environmental factors, and turnkey presentation should consider alternatives. The buildingâs age is evident, with uneven floors and multiple flooring surfaces that feel out of sync, and the overall decor feels tired and unfinished. For households with strong asthma or fragrance sensitivities, the environment poses a real concern given the noticeable disinfectant odor reported by several observers. Distance from home also factors into whether this is a practical long-term option, especially for families needing frequent in-person oversight.
The strongest positives, staff warmth, resident happiness, and a forthright, information-rich approach from the owner, partially offset the main drawbacks. Families can sense genuine care in how staff interact with residents and how openly questions are answered. The fact that remodeling is underway signals a potential for meaningful improvement, and residentsâ and staffâs enthusiasm suggests stability and a reluctance to cut corners on daily care. Yet these advantages do not erase the current gaps in environment and comfort; the aesthetic and sensory concerns are persistent and impactful for daily living.
On safety and living comfort, the drawbacks deserve sober attention. The persistent odor issue, attributed to disinfectants, raises questions for anyone with breathing sensitivities or asthma, and the reporting of multiple, uneven floor levels hints at potential tripping risks. Rooms and common areas are described as under-decorated and not inviting, which can undermine mood, engagement, and the sense of a true home. While the staffâs positive disposition cushions some of these realities, the physical state of the building remains a meaningful trade-off against the warmth of caregiving.
For families actively weighing options, the practical path is clear: insist on specific, objective demonstrations of ongoing upgrades and odor management plans, request a detailed timeline for renovations, and seek current residentsâ perspectives on daily routines, safety, and stimulation opportunities. Ask about floor plan accessibility, fall-prevention measures on uneven surfaces, and the availability of fragrance-free spaces or room-by-room customization. Determine staff-to-resident ratios, consistency of caregiving teams, and how care plans are coordinated with families. If the answers lean toward improvisation rather than a concrete, funded modernization plan, it is prudent to broaden the search.
Bottom line: Resting Place 1 delivers genuine care and candid communication in a setting that is clearly in transition toward improvement. For families prioritizing caregiver relationships and transparent operations, the community can be a solid choice, especially if a flexible, gradually upgraded environment is acceptable. However, for those who cannot compromise on modern aesthetics, a neutral odor, padded flooring, and a consistently updated interior, it is wise to explore alternatives that match those non-negotiables more closely. The choice hinges on balancing the value of attentive staff and open dialogue against the weight of outdated interiors and environmental concerns.









Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained