Weston Senior Living Center at Sullivan Trail Costs & Pricing
Weston Senior Living Center at Sullivan Trail offers competitive pricing for its residents, particularly when compared to both Northampton County and the overall state of Pennsylvania. For a semi-private room, the cost is $2,250 per month, which significantly undercuts the county average of $3,175 and the state average of $3,542. Similarly, the studio option is priced at $3,300 per month, also providing a favorable alternative to the local county rate of $3,398 and Pennsylvania's average of $3,737. This thoughtful pricing structure positions Weston Senior Living Center as an attractive choice for those seeking quality care without straining their financial resources.
| Floor plans | Weston Senior Living Center at Sullivan Trail | Northampton County | Pennsylvania |
|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,250 | $3,175 | $3,542 |
| Studio | $3,300 | $3,398 | $3,737 |
Overall Review of Weston Senior Living Center at Sullivan Trail
common
5 reviews mention this
Caregivers are often responsive
Residents describe staff as responsive and helpful with daily needs and concerns.
Several reviews say staff make a point to respond when families or residents have questions, especially around communication and doctor-related needs. Others describe staff as accommodating when it comes to assisting with devices and helping residents settle in. A few reviews also mention care provided when health issues came up, with no complaints reported afterward.
common
5 reviews mention this
Cleanliness comes up often
Many residents and families specifically call out how clean the building feels.
Multiple reviews describe the facility as clean and well kept during visits and tours. Some also mention not noticing odors that they have experienced at other older buildings. Along with the clean feel, a couple of reviewers connect the condition of the space to recent or ongoing updates.
common
7 reviews mention this
Dining is a frequent focus
Dining experience is a common point of praise and a few disappointments.
Several reviewers highlight the dining room or dining area as a standout, with one describing the option to get food brought to the room for an extra fee. Others note access to meals through cafeteria-style times, and at least one review mentions the appeal of having a fridge in the room. At the same time, a couple of residents express preferences about lighter, less salty food that werenât fully met, and another negative review says dietary needs were not provided.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Pricing and deposits draw contrast
Costs are a major deciding factor, but move-in deposits and refunds are criticized.
Some families say price was the reason they chose the community or that it offered good value for the level of care. Others criticize the up-front and refundable terms, including a nonrefundable move-in deposit and multiple complaints about not getting a security deposit back. One review also mentions choosing a smaller room for financial reasons, and another points to concerns about paying large deposits for the move-in process.
caveat
3 reviews mention this
Concerns about nursing oversight
A few reviews raise serious concerns about care oversight and accountability.
Some negative reviews describe inadequate on-site presence, with one reviewer saying they never saw a nurse or someone at authority desks. Others make allegations involving staff conduct and handling of resident needs. There are also specific complaints about medications and wound care, plus claims that families were not properly informed when problems occurred.
common
6 reviews mention this
Activities are scheduled but uneven
Residents describe an active calendar, though not everyone believes it matches whatâs advertised.
Several reviews mention regular activity opportunities such as bingo, cards, crafts, and baking, along with trips out for meals. Others point to events like movie night or gatherings tied to the community. One reviewer, however, says they did not see the activity types that were advertised, while another notes that at least some residents may spend more time in their apartments than in shared spaces.
common
2 reviews mention this
Itâs close to everyday errands
Families mention the communityâs location makes it easier to check in and run errands.
Two reviews specifically note convenience, including being near a family memberâs home and the ability to get to nearby shops and groceries. One reviewer also says the setting is close to things without feeling directly in heavy traffic. This aligns with several nearby pharmacy and retail options listed for the area.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.