2101 S Harvey Ave, Oklahoma City, OK 73109
To contact a resident: (405) 634-2435
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Andrews Square
Pros
One reviewer says it felt like an old home, describing it as “Old home sweet home from home!”- A former employee states that working there for 15 years was a great place to work.
Cons
Residents report persistent mice problems since moving in.- There are infestations of bed bugs and cockroaches, contributing to illness and fear.
- The complex is located in a not-so-great part of town.
- There is noise and privacy invasion, with reports of theft and disruptive behavior.
- An unauthorized entry occurred when someone with a key walked into a resident’s apartment.
- Management is accused of discriminating against service dogs.
- The administration is described as unfair, uncaring, and displaying double standards.
- Staff are described as rude, including an incident where a driver was left standing in the rain.
Review
Andrews Square in Oklahoma City is best suited for residents who have extremely limited housing options and can tolerate a high-maintenance, risk-forward environment. For families weighing assisted living paths, this community is not a first choice for those seeking a clean, predictable, and safely managed setting. It serves as a last-resort, affordable option where cost is the dividing line, but the conditions and day-to-day realities demand a stiff tolerance for infestations, safety concerns, and inconsistent management. In short, it may meet a budget constraint, but it does not deliver the stability or quality many seniors require.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are seniors and families who prioritize safety, health standards, and respectful, responsive administration. Prospective residents should be wary if cleanliness, pest control, noise control, and predictable access to staff support are non-negotiables. Individuals who rely on regular health or disability accommodations, or who expect a private, quiet living environment, will likely find this community unsatisfactory. Additionally, anyone who requires strong safeguards against unauthorized entry or discrimination should look elsewhere, as multiple reviews point to privacy breaches, perceived unfair treatment, and rigid policy enforcement.
The most tangible pro is affordability, a critical factor for households living on fixed incomes or with limited subsidies. Public housing status historically offers lower rent relative to market-rate options, which can enable access to shelter when other venues are unaffordable. Beyond that, there is an implication of continuity, longstanding presence within the building and a sense that long-time residents have weathered the same conditions over years. For a subset of residents, that familiarity can translate into a stubborn sense of community, albeit overshadowed by broader management and safety concerns.
However, the cons overwhelmingly eclipse any upside. Infestations are repeatedly cited, mice, bed bugs, cockroaches, creating health risks, disruption, and a pervasive sense of decay. Odors, unsanitary conditions, and the visible footprint of a volatile neighborhood compound the problem, underscoring a lack of reliable pest control and routine upkeep. Safety issues extend beyond pests: reports of unknown individuals accessing units with keys, intrusive neighbors, loud environments, and a general atmosphere of disorder raise serious concerns about personal security and residents’ ability to maintain a dignified living space. The administration and staff are described as rude, unfair, or unresponsive, with credible insinuations of double standards and discrimination that erode trust and willingness to engage.
Ultimately, the balance of evidence strongly favors alternatives for most families weighing assisted living decisions. The cost savings do not sufficiently compensate for ongoing infestations, safety breaches, and managerial unreliability. For those who must stay within this budget channel, the decision hinges on tolerance for risk and willingness to accept daily realities that many expect to be resolved in a well-run housing or care setting. Families should actively compare other affordable housing options with better pest control, stricter safety protocols, and more responsive leadership, and should verify current conditions in person before committing. A candid assessment of needs, local alternatives, and a clear plan for contingencies will determine whether Andrews Square can be a viable bridge or a cul-de-sac.
Active Adult Communities (55+)
Activities on-site
Devotional services off-site
Indoor common areas
Will Rogers World (6 miles away)
Ambulatory care
Diabetic care
Meals provided
Encouraging Participation in Adult Day Care: A Guide to Supporting a Hesitant Parent
Comprehensive Exploration of Living Wills and Other Advance Directives
A Detailed Exploration of Living Wills and Advance Directives