Angels Care Family Homes Loveland Costs & Pricing
Angels Care Family Homes in Loveland offers a supportive living environment with costs that reflect its premium services. For semi-private rooms, the monthly fee is set at $5,000, which is slightly below the Warren County average of $5,167 but notably higher than the state average of $3,965. Those seeking more privacy can opt for a studio room at Angels Care for $6,950 per month, a considerable increase compared to the county's average of $3,601 and Ohio's typical rate of $3,727. While these rates may be higher than those of surrounding areas, they underscore Angels Care's commitment to delivering quality care and accommodations tailored to resident needs.
| Floor plans | Angels Care Family Homes Loveland | Warren County | Ohio |
|---|
| Semi-Private | $5,000 | $5,167 | $3,965 |
| Studio | $6,950 | $3,601 | $3,727 |
Skilled Nursing Facilities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$851 / mo
Anthology of Mason
$4,149 to $7,499 / month
6.0 miles away
-
About the same
Barrington Of Oakley
$4,950 to $7,800 / month
9.4 miles away
-
from -$450 / mo
Courtyard At Seasons
$4,550 / month
5.9 miles away
-
About the same
Wellspring
$5,100 to $6,150 / month
12.3 miles away
-
from -$705 / mo
Traditions at Camargo
$4,295 to $5,895 / month
6.5 miles away
Overall Review of Angels Care Family Homes Loveland
common
26 reviews mention this
Caring, responsive staff
Residents and families consistently describe caregivers who are kind, attentive, and quick to respond.
Many reviewers say the staff treats residents with kindness, compassion, and respect, and that communication and responsiveness make families feel less worried. Several accounts describe caregivers providing personal support like showers, dressing, laundry, and meal help. A few reviews also mention staffing concerns, including that some nurses were not available as expected and that timely help could be harder during busy times.
differentiator
9 reviews mention this
Small, home-like setting
The small, home-style layout stands out as a key part of the care experience.
Reviewers frequently describe a smaller, more home-like environment rather than an institutional facility. Several mention that shared living spaces feel comfortable and that bedrooms and private bathrooms support a more personal feel. Families also point to fewer residents as enabling one-on-one attention, and they note features like a patio or covered porch for time outdoors.
differentiator
7 reviews mention this
Memory care focus
Residents requiring memory support are repeatedly mentioned alongside the specialized care approach.
Several reviews explicitly call out memory care, Alzheimer’s, dementia, or Parkinson’s, and describe staff support across different stages of decline. Reviewers also mention a memory unit and the need to prevent wandering, aligning with the home-style care described in other comments. One reviewer highlights the concept as suited for both assisted living and memory-focused needs.
common
5 reviews mention this
Meals feel home-cooked
Food and meal service are repeatedly described as fresh, appealing, and satisfying.
Reviewers mention cooks preparing meals and describe the food as nutritious and tasty, with some describing real food rather than a cafeteria-style experience. Others point to menu options that feel aligned with individual preferences and healthy choices. This emphasis on meals matches the community’s dining offerings, including room service and dietary options.
common
2 reviews mention this
Pricing can feel more comfortable
Some reviewers say the pricing compares favorably to larger communities.
At least a couple of reviews frame cost as reasonable for the type of home-style care being offered. One reviewer specifically compares pricing to larger communities and says it feels more comfortable, while another mentions value. With apartment-style housing and defined care services, families appear to be evaluating overall fit alongside what they pay.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Licensing concerns come up
A couple of reviewers raise concerns about licensing and staffing coverage.
Two reviews describe worries about whether the community is operating legally and how it is licensed. One of those comments also questions nursing coverage, saying nurses were pulled off the street, and another expresses concern that the community is not licensed by the state. These concerns are notably different from the many positive staffing and care experiences described elsewhere in the reviews.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.