36 Locust Avenue, Islip, NY 11751
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Pearl Garden Manor Costs & Pricing
Pearl Garden Manor offers competitive pricing for its residential accommodations, especially when compared to the broader market in Suffolk County and the state of New York. For instance, a semi-private room at Pearl Garden Manor costs $1,600 per month, significantly lower than the averages of $3,706 in Suffolk County and $4,389 statewide. Similarly, both the studio and one-bedroom options are priced at $3,200 each, which is more economical compared to Suffolk County's rates of $5,129 for studios and $5,646 for one-bedroom units. Even when contrasting with New York state averages for these room types - $4,532 for studios and $4,307 for 1-bedroom apartments - Pearl Garden Manor stands out as a notably cost-effective choice without compromising on quality or care.
| Floor plans | Pearl Garden Manor | Suffolk County | New York |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,600 | $3,706 | $4,389 |
| Studio | $3,200 | $5,129 | $4,532 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,200 | $5,646 | $4,307 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Pearl Garden Manor
Pros
The staff is excellent and ownership is hands-on.
The management is top-notch; the owner greeted guests and explained the level of care.
After meeting the owner, the visitors knew they were in the right place.
After five months, they realized their dad looked and felt happy.
They would recommend this place for sure.
The place is a beautiful Victorian home with welcoming residents and a nice staff.
The mom loves it there.
Cons
The pictures were not real and were described as totally fake.
The place stinks from the moment one enters.
Management was rude, profanity was used daily, and it was very unprofessional.
The food was not great.
Bed bugs and roaches were everywhere.
The place looked run-down.
The place was not a good fit for their family.
Review
Pearl Garden Manor in Islip is best suited for families who want a small, homeâlike senior living setting with a visibly handsâon ownership presence. The community tends to reward those who value direct engagement from the owner and a tourâfirst impression that signals care at the highest level. Set in a Victorianâstyle house, it offers a warm, communal atmosphere where residents and families can feel personally connected and where staff interactions are described as attentive and approachable. This is not a corporate, polished campus; it is a personâdriven operation that can deliver meaningful daily routines when leadership remains aligned with resident needs.
That said, it is not the right fit for every family. Those seeking a consistently pristine facility with impeccable, uniform operations and restaurantâgrade dining should look elsewhere. Reviews raise red flags about cleanliness, including claims that the space can feel unkempt or look run down, and even more troubling allegations about pests. There are also reports of a management style that some experience as brusque or unprofessional, which can undermine trust for families already balancing caregiving decisions. One review flags a discrepancy between photos and reality, underscoring the need for meticulous onâsite verification.
Against these concerns stand clear positives. The strongest assets are people: a handsâon owner, highly engaged staff, and management that makes a point of greeting families and explaining the level of care upfront. Repeatedly, visitors walk away convinced they chose the right place. After roughly five months, families observe that their loved one appears happier, more settled, and well cared for. The residence itself, despite concerns about upkeep, offers a homey, welcoming environment where residents mingle and staff know the names of the people they support. Those factors often translate into reliable daily routines and social engagement.
Where the balance tilts is in the negatives that appear with some frequency in the reviews. The odor and potential maintenance issues undermine comfort, while pest concerns and lessâthanâideal dining quality can diminish everyday satisfaction. The combination of unflattering impressions of cleanliness and the reported tone or behavior of leadership can erode confidence in the environmentâs safety and consistency. In practical terms, these elements may be dealâbreakers for families who demand predictable quality, transparent communication, and a consistently respectful atmosphere.
However, the pros can offset some of the cons if the previous experiences were tempered by real, ongoing improvements. The key is to see sustained actions: a transparent approach from ownership, visible investments in cleaning and pest control, and a dependable dining program that provides acceptable meals. Prospective residents should push for current references, request a live walkâthrough of sleeping and dining areas, and seek confirmation of pest control records, housekeeping schedules, and staff stability. If the ownerâs handsâon leadership remains present and the culture remains residentâcentered, the best aspects can prevail.
Bottom line: Pearl Garden Manor offers a practical choice for families prioritizing a personal, intimate setting and a direct, caring leadership style, provided the quality issues are actively monitored and addressed. It is especially suitable for those who want a homelike vibe and are prepared to verify the facilityâs claims with current residents and recent visits. For families that require immaculate upkeep, consistently high dining standards, and a consistently professional atmosphere, it would be prudent to explore other options where reliability and transparency are more firmly established.











Senior Transition Services: Understanding Their Role, Cost, and Importance
Exploring the Path to Senior Living: A Comprehensive Look at Independent Living and Assisted Living
Is Assisted Living Deductible on Your Taxes? Understanding the Complexities of Assisted Living Expenses and Deductions