Everling's Boarding Home

Cons

• The home is run by a woman who cares nothing for the residents and only for money.
• The 92-year-old grandmother lived there for only four weeks before she fell and broke her hip.
• After the fall, the staff did not promptly assist and EMTs were called several minutes later.
• There have been multiple incidents of mistreatment at this home.
• The owner opened the bedroom window despite subzero temperatures outside.
• The owner keeps the home's temperature below 70 degrees to avoid heating costs.
• Five residents live there, all paying $1800+ per month.
• The place should be shut down.

Review

This account portrays a care home run by a woman who, according to the writer, cares more about money than the well-being of the people living there. The reviewer strongly cautions others not to bring their loved ones to this facility, suggesting that the management's priorities are profit above safety and compassion. The message is urgent and angry, underscoring a deep distrust of how residents are treated and how money shapes decisions inside the home.

A central and heartbreaking claim concerns the grandmother who was 92 years old while she lived there for a brief period of four weeks. The writer describes a fall that resulted in a broken hip, a crisis that should have triggered swift, professional medical assistance. Instead, the person writing the review contends that the women who run the home picked the grandmother up and placed her in a chair, and only after several minutes did they summon emergency medical services. The account emphasizes that this was not an isolated incident, implying a pattern of neglect or slow response times in emergencies.

The review goes further to describe mistreatment following a bed-based accident. According to the writer, after the elderly resident had an involuntary mishap in her bed, she was subjected to mistreatment rather than proper care and support. The narrative suggests a lack of compassion and appropriate handling in the wake of incontinence or related issues, casting doubt on the sensitivity and professionalism of the home's staff.

In another alarming detail, the owner is said to have opened the resident's bedroom window while temperatures outside were well below freezing. The writer notes that the home's temperature is kept below 70 degrees, with the stated motive being to avoid higher heating costs. This claim underscores a broader accusation that cost-cutting measures are prioritized over residents' comfort and safety, especially given the frigid conditions outside and the vulnerability of elderly residents who depend on a stable, warm indoor environment.

Financial aspects are laid bare as part of the critique. The review points out that there are five residents living in the home, and all of them are paying more than $1,800 per month. The suggestion is that such high monthly charges are aligned with, or indicative of, a profit-driven approach rather than transparent, resident-centered care. The combination of high rents and alleged cost-cutting on heating reinforces a perception that residents are being treated as sources of revenue rather than as individuals deserving dignified, attentive care.

The message closes with a vehement call for shutdown and accountability. The writer ends with a stark declaration that the place "needs to be shut down," a sentiment rooted in the accumulation of alleged incidents and practices described earlier. The tone conveys fear for residents' safety, frustration with perceived indifference from the administrator, and a strong urge for intervention by authorities or regulatory bodies to prevent further harm.

Taken together, the account paints a picture of a care home where safety concerns, potential neglect, and cost-driven decisions are intertwined with alarm about the treatment of elderly residents. The allegations touch on emergency response times, post-incident care, living conditions, and the adequacy of heating and comfort, all framed within a critique of a facility run for profit rather than for the welfare of its residents. The reviewer's strongest impulse is to alert others and advocate for action to ensure that vulnerable residents receive the respect, attention, and safety they deserve.

Places of Worship

• Immaculate Conception Rectory (2.1 miles)
• Immaculate Conception Church (2.1 miles)
• Christian & Missionary Alliance (2.4 miles)
• New York Ministry Network Royal Rangers (4.3 miles)
• The Palyul Retreat Center (9.7 miles)
• United Methodist Church (13.4 miles)
• United Church UCC (13.6 miles)

Restaurants

• The Silo Restaurant (6.5 miles)
• Sacred Heart Ukrainian Picnic Grounds (8.8 miles)
• Beer Tree Brew Co. (9.4 miles)
• McGirk's Irish Pub (10.3 miles)
• Apple Hills Farm (10.6 miles)
• Jones Humdinger (10.7 miles)
• Best Bagels In Town (10.8 miles)

Parks

• Chenango Valley State Park (6.8 miles)
• Otsiningo Park (14 miles)
• Cfj Park (15.3 miles)

Physicians

• Chenango Bridge Medical (10.3 miles)
• UHS Primary Care (11.3 miles)
• Lourdes Family Practice (12.1 miles)
• Lourdes (12.1 miles)
• Oxford Family Health (13.9 miles)
• V A Binghamton Clinic (14.2 miles)
• Primary Care Associates (14.2 miles)

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (11.4 miles)
• Bartles Pharmacy (13.7 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (14.5 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (15.2 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (15.3 miles)
• Walgreens (15.6 miles)
• Wegmans (15.6 miles)

Hospitals

• Lourdes Health Support (11.9 miles)
• New York State Inebriate Asylum (14.2 miles)
• Binghamton Psychiatric Center (14.2 miles)
• Our Lady of Lourdes Memorial Hospital (14.2 miles)
• Lourdes Hospital (14.3 miles)
• Lourdes Hospital (14.7 miles)
• Robert M. Best Cardiac Care Unit - UHS Wilson Regional Medical Center (15.3 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (13 miles)