The Chelsea at Tinton Falls Costs & Pricing
The Chelsea at Tinton Falls offers a range of competitive pricing that reflects both its quality of service and the local market. For a semi-private room, residents can expect to pay $4,110 per month, which is significantly lower than the average costs in Monmouth County ($5,251) and across New Jersey ($5,068). A studio apartment is priced at $6,270, also exceeding the county's average of $5,738 but remaining below the state average of $5,286. For those seeking more space, a one-bedroom unit is available for $7,230; while this figure is higher than the county average of $9,644 and exceeds New Jersey's state average of $5,994 considerably. Overall, The Chelsea at Tinton Falls positions itself as an appealing option for individuals looking for value alongside quality care in an increasingly competitive environment.
| Floor plans | The Chelsea at Tinton Falls | Monmouth County | New Jersey |
|---|
| Semi-Private | $4,110 | $5,251 | $5,068 |
| Studio | $6,270 | $5,738 | $5,286 |
| 1 Bedroom | $7,230 | $9,644 | $5,994 |
Skilled Nursing Facilities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$610 / mo
Gardens At Monroe Healthcare And Rehabilitation
$3,500 / month
21.1 miles away
-
from +$490 / mo
Bayside Manor
$4,600 to $5,200 / month
8.6 miles away
-
from +$420 / mo
Brandywine Living At The Sycamore
$4,530 to $7,680 / month
1.0 miles away
-
from -$290 / mo
Complete Care at Green Acres
$3,820 to $4,200 / month
22.6 miles away
-
from +$190 / mo
Arbor Terrace Middletown
$4,300 to $5,200 / month
6.1 miles away
Overall Review of The Chelsea at Tinton Falls
differentiator
13 reviews mention this
Memory care support feels personal
Residents in the memory care program are described as being included, supported, and cared for by knowledgeable staff.
Several residentsā families describe memory care staff as knowledgeable and caring, including staff on the nursing side. Multiple reviewers also mention communication that helps them feel confident about comfort, safety, and medication needs. A few reviews specifically note ongoing engagement, even when the resident canāt communicate as before. Physical therapy support is also mentioned in at least one respite experience.
common
28 reviews mention this
Staff communication and responsiveness
Across reviews, residentsā families describe staff as attentive, kind, and responsive to questions and needs.
A large share of reviewers say staff members are friendly and attentive, and that they follow through on help with day-to-day needs. Many families mention frequent communication and reassurance, especially during transitions or when medication questions come up. Some reviewers also call out specific individuals and describe feeling supported by management. A smaller number of reviews express concern about professionalism or that staffing felt insufficient, but those are outweighed by positive accounts of responsiveness.
common
18 reviews mention this
Activities and social engagement
Residents are frequently described as staying engaged through daily activities, events, and group participation.
Many reviews describe a steady schedule of activities, from daily programming to special events and holiday or community gatherings. Several families say their loved ones are more social and active than they were previously. Memory care-specific engagement is also mentioned, including simple group activities designed to include residents. In one negative visit-touring review, the atmosphere felt quiet with little interaction, suggesting activity experience may vary by day and unit.
caveat
9 reviews mention this
Dining quality is mixed
Food reviews run strongly positive, but some residents and families report serious quality problems.
Several reviewers describe the food as good or high quality, including clean presentation and variety, and they mention restaurant-style dining and meal service. Others report dining concerns, including complaints that food quality declined and that meals were not enjoyable. There are also mentions of families liking the option to choose food during respite. Overall, dining satisfaction appears inconsistent across reviewers.
caveat
10 reviews mention this
Facility condition and upkeep concerns
Some reviewers praise cleanliness, while others report safety and maintenance issues that affected confidence in the building.
A number of reviews say the community is clean, well kept, and maintained. But multiple negative reviews describe issues like dated decor, chipped paint, and concerns about cleanliness on the day of the visit. At least one reviewer raises serious safety concerns involving equipment (including elevator problems) and another mentions problems with transportation tied to an air-conditioning component. These reports stand out as the biggest caveats in the overall tone.
common
2 reviews mention this
Convenient access to local services
Reviewers mention the location as accessible to the rest of the area, with nearby medical and retail options.
One reviewer describes the location as central and convenient, while another comments on limited outside space around the building for walks. The area includes nearby medical and pharmacy options, which can matter for day-to-day needs and appointments. However, proximity to services is balanced against comments that the immediate surroundings feel limited for outdoor outings.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.