Concord Regional Vna
Save30 Pillsbury Street, Concord, NH 03301
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
The collection of reviews presents Granite VNA as an organization that elicits wildly different experiences from patients and families. On one end of the spectrum, there are heartfelt testimonies about exceptional care delivered by capable, compassionate professionals who left a lasting positive impression. On the other end, multiple accounts describe a pattern of chaos, miscommunication, and handling that some families found unsafe or dehumanizing. Taken together, these reviews sketch a service that can be life-changing in the best possible way when it works, but can become a source of significant frustration and risk when it does not.
Several reviews highlight moments of outstanding care. Families praised the dedication and expertise of specific team members, noting that staff like Cindy (a nurse) and Suzanne (a physical therapist) provided "top notch care" and went "above and beyond what is a privilege." There are mentions of kind and compassionate behavior, with phrases such as "Kind, compassionate care, excellent communication with referring physician" and "Caring, dedicated professionals" that suggest strong, effective interactions when the stars align. In some cases, patients described the nurses and aides as generally professional and deeply reassuring, with gratitude for the support they received during difficult recovery periods or for assistance in care planning for aging loved ones. The Concord location also receives positive remarks from some reviewers who called their experience "great" and credited its staff with meaningful, steady care.
Contrasting sharply with these testimonials are a number of troubling experiences that repeatedly surface across reviews. Several accounts describe serious lapses in organization and administration encountered after a patient's hospital discharge. One reviewer recounted an urgent home-visit request made two days after a stroke hospitalization, only to find that the visit was conducted without proper authorization verification and insurance confirmation, leaving the patient and caregiver feeling misled and frustrated. The same account details a labyrinth of disconnected steps: an intake specialist who could not troubleshoot scheduling effectively, a supervisor who was unavailable, and repeated unanswered calls that culminated in days with no callback and no appointment. The pattern described - miscommunication, delays, and a lack of reliable follow-through - appears to recur across multiple posts.
There are also multiple accounts centered on problematic scheduling and inconsistent communication. Reviewers commonly report being surprised by when staff would arrive, with some stating that patients "will never know when they're coming" until a couple of hours beforehand, which complicates any attempt to juggle other appointments. Complaints note that holiday or vacation coverage is poorly planned, leaving clients without needed services. Even when care did happen, some reviewers described brief visits in which nurses did not follow through on promised actions, and others warned about frequent no-shows or last-minute changes that eroded trust. These scheduling issues appear to undermine the overall quality of care and contribute to a perception of unreliability.
A number of highly specific and emotionally charged criticisms center on individual staff members and conduct. Notably, several reviews allege harassment and inappropriate behavior by a nurse named Laura, describing calls to schedule visits with insufficient notice, attempts to override medical advice given by doctors, and even threats directed at patients or their families. The allegations extend to claims of pressure to alter birth plans, inappropriate medical guidance to new parents about infant vitamins or feeding, and a broader impression that some staff behaved as if they held more authority than a physician. In addition, there are accusations that a staff member could remotely trigger external oversight agencies (such as DCYF) inappropriately. Taken together, these lurid specifics contribute to a perception of dangerous professional boundaries being crossed and a deep loss of trust in the agency's representatives.
Beyond these single-person concerns, several reviews express a sense that the organization's core mission - providing compassionate, competent care - has been undermined by systemic issues. Several accounts argue that the agency's focus appears skewed toward fundraising or administrative tasks at the expense of patient-centered care, with claims that staff are more concerned with collecting donations than with delivering essential services. There are even strongly worded warnings about end-of-life care, where the emphasis on compliance and reputational risk seems to have overshadowed genuine empathy for patients and families facing dire situations. Such statements underscore a fear that vulnerable patients could be left underserved or mishandled in critical moments.
Despite the negativity some reviewers express, there are additional testimonials that acknowledge long-standing relationships and positive experiences over extended periods. A few patients describe having relied on the agency for many years, noting that continuity of care and the presence of trustworthy staff can make a profound difference. In one poignant example, a friend who had been receiving home care for roughly two decades faced a sudden end to services, resulting in a severe risk scenario that the reviewer framed as abandonment. The fear expressed in that account - about leaving a highly vulnerable person without regular care - highlights how essential reliable scheduling and dependable staffing are to those who depend on these services, especially during crises like COPD, oxygen dependence, or post-stroke recovery.
In sum, the picture that emerges is not simply "good vs. bad." It is a portrait of a service with extraordinary potential when exemplary staff are present and well-supported, tempered by consistent and widespread concerns about disorganization, unreliable scheduling, and some frightening accounts of staff behavior. For Granite VNA to fulfill its promise, these reviews suggest a need to tighten intake and coordination processes, improve scheduling reliability and transparency, ensure strict adherence to medical guidance, and establish clearer boundaries and professional conduct standards for all staff. When appears to work smoothly, the experience is nothing short of transformative; when it does not, the consequences can be serious and emotionally draining for patients and their families.
Concord Regional VNA in Concord, NH is a premier assisted living community that offers a range of amenities and care services to enhance the quality of life for its residents. The community provides a comfortable and home-like environment, with fully furnished apartments that include cable or satellite TV, Wi-Fi/high-speed internet, and telephone services.
Residents have access to a dining room where they can enjoy delicious meals prepared by the community's professional chefs. Special dietary restrictions are accommodated to ensure that each resident's nutritional needs are met.
Concord Regional VNA prioritizes the well-being of its residents by offering various care services such as 24-hour supervision, assistance with activities of daily living, bathing, dressing, and transfers. The experienced staff also assists with medication management and provides specialized diabetes diets when necessary.
To promote mental wellness and social interaction, the community offers resident-run activities as well as scheduled daily activities. Residents can also engage in reading at the small library or spend time outdoors in the garden or other outdoor spaces.
Concord Regional VNA is conveniently located near two cafes, parks, pharmacies, physicians, restaurants, transportation options, places of worship, and hospitals. This accessibility ensures that residents have easy access to essential amenities and services within close proximity.
Overall, Concord Regional VNA provides a supportive and enriching environment where residents can maintain their independence while receiving personalized care and assistance whenever needed.
Concord Regional Vna is located at 30 Pillsbury Street, Concord, NH 03301 in Merrimack County, New Hampshire
Concord Regional Vna on seniors.fyi includes 6 photos including images showing building, parking, entrance, modern architecture, office, architecture, exterior, windows, and more.
Harris Hill Center
Concord, NH
Compassionate staff in some cases and private rooms that feel homelike.
Harris Hill Center costs
Harris Hill Center reviews
Harris Hill Center images
White Rock Senior Community
Bow, NH
Bright, well-maintained apartments with friendly staff and on-site amenities.
White Rock Senior Community costs
White Rock Senior Community reviews
White Rock Senior Community images
Hillsbrook Village at Allenstown
Allenstown, NH
Supportive, attentive staff in a clean, safe environment with engaging activities.
Hillsbrook Village at Allenstown costs
Hillsbrook Village at Allenstown reviews
Hillsbrook Village at Allenstown images
Maple Leaf Health Care Center
Manchester, NH
Caring staff with good communication and a clean environment.
Maple Leaf Health Care Center reviews
Maple Leaf Health Care Center images
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) are fundamental tasks vital for an individual's independence, particularly in older adults over 85, and include functions like bathing and dressing; assessing ADLs alongside Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) helps determine the level of required assistance due to age-related health challenges. Tailored support plans, involving family and community resources, are essential for maintaining dignity and autonomy in assisted living environments.
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Medicare does not cover assisted living costs, as it focuses on acute medical needs and short-term care, with exceptions for certain medically necessary services like physical therapy. Individuals must explore other options such as Medicaid, veterans' benefits, or long-term care insurance to manage these expenses effectively.
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Choosing between assisted living and nursing homes involves evaluating emotional and financial factors, with assisted living offering independence and support for daily activities at a lower cost, while nursing homes provide intensive medical care for individuals with significant health needs. The decision is influenced by personal preferences, health status, cognitive function, and varying Medicaid coverage across states.