6620 Ellerhurst Dr, Las Vegas, NV 89103
To contact a resident: (702) 251-7886
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Theresiane Adult Group Care
Cons
The house manager-care taker neglects basic duties, such as not offering meals, withholding medicine, and failing to change bed linens.- A resident uses racial terminology openly and loudly in front of others.
- The situation is described as getting out of control.
- The reporting process is hindered by an open case, preventing a new report.
Review
Theresiane Adult Group Care in Las Vegas is not well aligned with the needs of seniors who require dependable daily care, predictable routines, and a respectful, responsive care team. The best-fit profile for this community would be an extremely small-margin resident whose family can provide intensive ongoing supervision and who can tolerate chronic gaps in basic services. In practical terms, this setting is ill-suited for anyone who relies on regular meals, timely medication administration, and consistent housekeeping. Families seeking a facility that reliably manages day-to-day needs, ensures safety, and maintains a dignified atmosphere should look elsewhere, as the gap between expectation and delivery appears to be wide and persistent.
Those evaluating alternatives should note that this is not a good match for residents with higher care requirements, cognitive or behavioral challenges, or anyone who expects proactive intervention in conflicts or harassment. If a senior needs structured meals, medication oversight, and prompt attention to safety concerns, a facility with proven staffing stability and clear accountability is essential. Potential residents who prioritize a calm, respectful social environment, and who rely on staff to enforce decorum and protect residents from discriminatory behavior, will likely be disappointed here. In short, families should consider other licensed options with a track record of consistent care and strong resident advocacy.
From a practical standpoint, the few apparent advantages of a small, home-like setting are far outweighed by the most troubling drawbacks. The review points to a pattern of missed fundamental duties, no meals provided, medications withheld, and bed linens not changed. These failures strike at basic dignity and health, transforming daily life from manageable routine to a persistent safety and wellness risk. Even if a resident values companionship in a shared space, the severity of care gaps undermines any potential comfort. When basic tasks are neglected, any potential positives fail to offset the risk to physical well-being and emotional security.
The most alarming elements center on safety and accountability. The caregiver’s neglect is coupled with a lack of timely intervention in situations where a resident uses racial slurs in front of others, with no documented or satisfactory response from staff. The reviewer notes that Adult Protective Services has a case open, and the situation continues to escalate rather than improve. This combination of caregiving failures and an unsafe social environment signals a facility where supervision, reporting, and corrective action are consistently insufficient. For families, that pattern is a red flag: reliability and resident protection appear compromised.
Families confronting these realities should take decisive steps. First, verify the facility’s licensing status and inspection history, and request direct access to care plans, medication administration records, and a clear housekeeping schedule. Seek a meeting with the administrator to outline expectations, contingencies, and a commitment to immediate remediation. Consider escalating concerns to licensing authorities or Adult Protective Services if safety or rights are at risk, and prepare a contingency plan that includes a smooth transition to a more capable provider. In parallel, compare with larger, more regulated options that demonstrate consistent oversight, structured programming, and active resident advocacy.
Ultimately, the prudent conclusion is clear: this community should be approached with extreme caution. The documented gaps in care, combined with a failure to address harassment and safety concerns, create a risk profile that most families will find unacceptable. If a move remains under consideration, it must be accompanied by stringent oversight, transparent accountability, and a concrete plan to establish the necessary level of care before any long-term commitment is made. Options with proven clinical management, reliable staff performance, and a culture of respect will serve families far better when prioritizing health, dignity, and peace of mind.
Board and Care Home
McCarran International (5 miles away)
Comfortable, fully furnished living spaces with comprehensive care services, meals, activities, and housekeeping.
Comprehensive Guide to Blood Pressure Charts for Older Adults: Understanding Normal and High Readings by Age
Financing Long-Term Nursing Home Care Through Social Security: A Thorough Exploration
Essential Knowledge on Pneumonia in Older Adults