121 South 3rd, Livingston, MT 59047
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Frontier Assisted Living Costs & Pricing
Frontier Assisted Living offers competitively priced options for its residents, particularly when compared to the broader market in Park County and across Montana. For semi-private rooms, Frontier maintains a cost-effective rate of $750 per month, which aligns with the local average but significantly undercuts the state-wide average of $3,874. Similarly, for one-bedroom accommodations, Frontier's monthly fee of $1,800 is not only lower than the county's typical charge of $3,798 but also offers an attractive alternative to the state's average of $3,468. This pricing structure underscores Frontier's commitment to providing quality assisted living at accessible rates while ensuring that residents receive personalized care in a welcoming environment.
| Floor plans | Frontier Assisted Living | Park County | Montana |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $750 | $750 | $3,874 |
| 1 Bedroom | $1,800 | $3,798 | $3,468 |
Overall Review of Frontier Assisted Living
Pros
The kitchen staff loves their job.
They couldn't ask for a better job.
The residents love it there.
Cons
The facility is not suitable for elderly residents due to poor living conditions, food, and staff.
The workers are rude to the residents.
The kitchen is a disgusting mess.
The dishes have stains and wine stains on them.
The grill is going to catch fire and blow up.
The Flat Top is disgusting and could catch fire and blow up.
There are rats in the basement.
It is the most horrible place for elderly or disabled people and should be shut down.
Review
Frontier Assisted Living in Livingston, MT is best suited for families operating on a tight budget who can commit to active oversight and rapid problem-solving, rather than for seniors who require consistent, high-quality care in a clean, well-run environment. The community does not meet the mark for those who expect dependable daily routines, respectful staff, and spotless facilities. For families with limited options, Frontier may seem affordable, but the ongoing need for vigilant supervision and a readiness to press for improvements is essential. This is not a setting to relocate someone and hope for steady, trouble-free operation; it demands ongoing accountability and hands-on involvement.
Multiple reviews converge on a troubling baseline: living conditions, food service, and staff behavior shape a negative daily experience. Dishes and kitchen cleanliness are described as stained and unsanitary, with alarming safety concerns around equipment and even rodents alleged in concealed areas. The atmosphere is characterized by mismanagement and neglect, with residents seemingly facing delays or a lack of responsiveness. The recurring theme is risk to basic comfort and safety: odors, grime, and a sense that issues are not addressed promptly. Families should anticipate a facility that struggles to sustain the mandates of hygiene and orderly operation that seniors deserve.
Against the dominant negative tenor, a single kitchen employee offers a contrasting note: a sense of job satisfaction and claims that residents love it there. This isolated positive account hints at moments when staff engagement may bolster the environment, suggesting pockets of genuine connection. Yet this lone voice does not counter the breadth of negative experiences described by others, nor does it demonstrate systemic reliability. The existence of one favorable perspective among many unfavorable ones underscores the fundamental question: is there a workable core of care hidden beneath visible organizational flaws, or are the positive experiences mere outliers that do not reflect daily reality?
Pros, where they exist, do not meaningfully offset the main drawbacks. The favorable account from one employee points to personal rapport rather than a proven, institution-wide standard of care. The reviews do not substantiate any meaningful advantage such as consistently lower cost, stronger safety records, or dependable service delivery. Without verified, across-the-board improvements, the notion of a âvalue propositionâ collapses under the weight of repeated sanitation, safety, and courtesy concerns. In practical terms, families must weigh whether any perceived warmth or occasional kindness can compensate for chronic cleanliness failures and irregular caregiver responsiveness.
For families evaluating Frontier, due diligence is essential before any commitment. Tours should be zeroed in on cleanliness, kitchen operations, and safety protocols; demand recent health inspections and any corrective action plans; observe meals and resident-staff interactions; and inquire about staff turnover and shift coverage on weekends. Seek transparent metrics and independent reviews to triangulate the experience. Compare with nearby facilities that routinely publish inspection histories, staffing levels, and resident satisfaction data. If Frontier is pursued, insist on trial periods, written service plans, and concrete, trackable goals for improvement, with clear accountability for the provider if milestones are not met.
In sum, Frontier Assisted Living is not recommended for seniors who require reliable daily care, a pristine environment, and consistently respectful staff. It may be a viable option only for families willing to maintain rigorous oversight and demand prompt, demonstrable remediation. Alternatives with stronger sanitation records, steadier staffing, and broader evidence of resident satisfaction across multiple sources should be prioritized. The decision hinges on whether cost savings justify accepting a setting with documented concerns around cleanliness, safety, and caregiver responsiveness. If other facilities offer transparent operations and dependable routines, they should be preferred over Frontier unless an aggressive, verifiable plan for improvement is presented and sustained.










Understanding Dementia Through Its Seven Stages: A Comprehensive Look at Progression and Expectations
A Holistic Dementia Care Guide: Effective Strategies for Memory Support
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment