8424 Lucas and Hunt Road, Jennings, MO 63136
To contact a resident: (314) 385-0707
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of St John Neumann Apartments
Pros
It seems very trustworthy to stay.- Management conducts monthly pest-control sprays.
- The property shows ongoing maintenance efforts.
Cons
The place is going down and gets worse each year.- There is a bed bug infestation throughout the building.
- The apartments are not livable due to bugs and pests.
- Tenants are bitten by bugs and exposed to chemicals from pest control.
- There is poor ventilation and a persistent odor in the hallways.
- Management reportedly kept deposits and did not cover furniture damaged by bugs and chemicals.
- The property is misrepresented as bug-free despite residentsâ experiences.
Review
St John Neumann Apartments is best suited for highly independent seniors who need an affordable, no-frills place to live in Jennings, MO, and whose daily routine can operate with limited on-site assistance. For residents who want a simple apartment without frills and are willing to tolerate ongoing maintenance questions, this setting can serve as a short- to mid-term solution. It is not recommended for anyone who requires assisted living services, regular housekeeping, or a pest-free, health-conscious environment. The combination of building age and resource constraints makes it a fit only for those who can accept a hands-off approach and are comfortable managing issues themselves or with family oversight.
Those needing reliable pest control, a clean, fresh-smelling living space, modern amenities, or proactive management should look elsewhere. Families with residents who have asthma, allergies, immune compromise, or sensitivity to chemicals will want to steer toward options with verifiable, health-forward pest management and transparent maintenance records. If deposits and move-in costs matter, and if facing inconsistent service from management is a dealbreaker, alternatives that provide clearer policies and stronger accountability are worth pursuing.
Reviews coalesce around a core problem: pervasive pest issues that residents report as bed bugs and roaches spanning the building. The building reportedly smells, and carpets are described as dirty. Tenants recount furniture damage from pest-control sprays and concerns over chemical exposure, including being bitten in the process. Ventilation appears lacking inside units, exacerbating discomfort. Even where pest control is supposedly scheduled monthly, pests persist, and some tenants allege that management requires signing a form to trigger service. The most troubling financial note is a deposit being kept after alleged damage caused by pests and chemicals, creating a climate of distrust about the lease terms and upkeep.
On the rare occasions residents express satisfaction, those ratings reflect value for the cost and basic independence rather than the quality of the living environment. The few higher-star reviews suggest some comfort with affordability or location, but the repetitive pest and odor complaints render those positives marginal. The primary advantage, lower price and a straightforward apartment, fails to offset the core risks: ongoing infestations, potential health hazards from sprays, and a management approach that seems slow to address systemic problems. Until pest control results are verifiable and units are consistently pest-free, the positives cannot meaningfully counterbalance the risk.
Families evaluating this community should insist on a current, written pest-control plan, including recent service reports and a guaranteed pest-free certification for each unit before moving in. Demand a transparent, enforceable deposit policy and a clear maintenance response timeline with evidence of improvements. Schedule independent inspections of multiple units to confirm cleanliness, odor, and ventilation; question whether any renovations have been planned to address carpet cleanliness and air flow. Compare with other local communities that provide proactive pest management, routine housekeeping, and resident-focused management practices before making a decision.
Given the documented pest concerns, odors, and questions about management responsiveness, this community is not a practical fit for most families seeking a reliable, health-forward senior living option. It should only be considered if affordability is the sole priority, the resident can tolerate ongoing pest issues, and family oversight is available to verify improvements and hold management accountable. Otherwise, pursue alternatives with transparent pest-control histories, cleaner living spaces, and stronger, more responsive on-site leadership.
Active Adult Communities (55+)
Lambert-St Louis International (5 miles away)
Comprehensive Look at Senior Blood Pressure Charts: Normal and Elevated Levels by Age
Top Canine Companions for Older Adults
Comprehensive Guide to Blood Pressure Charts for Older Adults: Understanding Normal and High Readings by Age