4307 159Th Court West, Rosemount, MN 55068
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
Across a number of residential facilities discussed by residents, the experiences run a wide gamut - from warm, home-like environments where staff are described as compassionate and attentive, to deeply troubling accounts of mistreatment and systemic neglect. Several reviews highlight a sense of belonging and genuine care in some houses, while others paint a stark, critical picture of the same organizations' leadership, training, and day-to-day operations. Taken together, the collection offers a complex portrait of care experiences that can feel both like a supportive community and, at times, a troubling workplace for those living there.
Several residents recount very positive experiences at places like the Cottages Group and Commonwealth. One reviewer describes living in a Cottages Group home where the house manager is "great," staff are described as compassionate toward residents, and housemates are "awesome and sweet." The tone is affectionate and protective, with the reviewer expressing genuine warmth: a warm, loving home atmosphere, amazing staff, and a manager who is attentive and understanding. Another account praises Commonwealth as the "best company ever," and notes a year-long residency that feels like home. This reviewer contrasts their current, supportive environment with a previous one where they faced verbal abuse, emphasizing that "the staff? are not" abusive; they specifically single out Jerrianna as an amazing DM and credit the supportive environment with aiding recovery after a breast cancer diagnosis. The reviewer stresses that the staff work to make residents, families, and friends feel welcome, and insists that this is not merely a group home but a real home.
In contrast to these uplifting experiences, a much more negative and combustible set of accounts centers on a different property and on broader organizational issues. One reviewer from the Cottages Group House, Burncrest, alleges severe mistreatment: residents treated "like an animal," staff mocking others with severe mental complications, and managers who allegedly believe staff over residents. The reviewer claims lies are told when accusations arise and asserts that the manager sides with staff rather than residents. They recount a specific interaction about cooking rice with less water - where a staff member reportedly refused to accommodate the resident's request and later claimed it was a joke, which the manager appeared to accept. The reviewer also disparages another review (referred to as "Cynthia's review") as a "lie," and charges that leadership is a disaster, with three managers allegedly mistreated into quitting. This account paints a picture of a highly dysfunctional environment where accountability seems unclear, and where resident concerns may be undermined by a staff-centric leadership culture.
Amidst the mix of praise and denunciation, there is also a brief, positive note about Eriksmoen. One reviewer states simply that their experiences with Eriksmoen have been positive, offering a small respite from the more heated criticisms elsewhere. This snippet hints at a possible variation in the quality of care even within the same broader system, suggesting that some locations or managers may be more effective or caring than others.
Another reviewer provides a sweeping, highly critical indictment of the company more generally, claiming to have wasted 11 months with a "lying, worthless, game-playing company." This account accuses staff of a long-standing deception about training and a focus on phone use or constant complaints rather than resident care. The reviewer asserts that pursuing concern leads to termination, and claims extensive formal complaints - 14 concerns with DHS by two professionals, and 18 pages of concerns filed as recently as last week. They argue that management hires for obedience rather than leadership, implying a culture that rewards following orders from the two male owners rather than genuinely addressing residents' needs. They recount overheard conversations about mistreatment of quality staff, and describe the company as "sewer scum" whose comeuppance is inevitable. They also detail specific personal grievances, including withheld rent, unreturned calls, a paraplegic resident whose chair was not charged properly, and a failure to address issues with a resident's bed, bathroom cleanliness, and other daily needs. The tone is bitter, accusatory, and saturated with dissatisfaction about both staff performance and management responsiveness.
Embedded in this broader critique are specific, troubling anecdotes that these residents believe illustrate systemic failure: a resident's chair not being charged, ongoing sanitation concerns such as a black trail in a bathroom that has gone uncleaned since November, and the perceived mismatches between what staff are trained to do (dispensing meds, apparently) and what residents require for daily living and safety. The complainant also points to equipment failures and a lack of accountability, alleging that attempts to engage with management about concerns are routinely unanswered, which compounds the sense of neglect and frustration. They insist on a harsh judgment of the organization's leadership and its ability - or willingness - to put residents first.
Taken together, these reviews reveal two dominant currents: appreciation for real, home-like care when it works - where managers listen, staff show warmth and compassion, and residents feel valued - and deep distrust and anger when residents perceive neglect, mismanagement, and a culture that deprioritizes accountability. On one side, residents speak of supportive environments that foster recovery, belonging, and dignity. On the other side, residents describe environments where serious concerns about safety, cleanliness, communication, and leadership go unresolved, sometimes resulting in formal complaints and a pervasive sense that residents are optional or expendable. The juxtaposition underscores the complexity of running group homes and similar care settings, where the lived experience can diverge dramatically from one house to the next, and where the difference between feeling cared for and feeling abandoned may hinge on the day-to-day choices of managers, staff, and the systems that guide oversight.
Gondola Group II in Rosemount, MN is an assisted living community that offers a range of amenities and care services to meet the needs of its residents. The community features a dining room where delicious meals are served, creating opportunities for socialization. Each resident's living space is fully furnished, providing a comfortable and home-like atmosphere.
Gondola Group II also has a beautiful garden and outdoor space where residents can enjoy fresh air and nature. Housekeeping services are provided to ensure that the living environment remains clean and tidy. Residents can stay connected with their loved ones through telephone and Wi-Fi/high-speed internet access.
The community offers various care services to assist residents with their daily activities. Trained staff is available to provide support with bathing, dressing, and transfers. Gondola Group II coordinates with healthcare providers to ensure that residents receive the necessary medical attention. Assistance with managing medications and diabetes diet is also provided.
Meal preparation and service take into account any special dietary restrictions that residents may have. Transportation arrangements for medical appointments are available to ensure that residents can easily access healthcare services.
Residents at Gondola Group II can enjoy a vibrant lifestyle through scheduled daily activities designed to promote engagement and socialization. Nearby cafes, parks, pharmacies, restaurants, theaters, physicians offices, and hospitals offer convenience and accessibility for additional leisure options or healthcare needs.
In summary, Gondola Group II in Rosemount, MN provides a comfortable living environment with various amenities and care services designed to enhance the well-being of its residents.
This part of Rosemount, Minnesota, offers a variety of amenities and services that may appeal to seniors looking for a convenient and bustling community. With multiple pharmacies nearby, accessing prescription medications and health care services is easily manageable. There are also several cafes and restaurants in close proximity, providing opportunities for socializing and dining out. For medical needs, there are physicians' offices and hospitals within a short driving distance. Additionally, the area boasts several parks for outdoor recreation and relaxation. Places of worship are also available for spiritual engagement. Overall, this neighborhood combines essential services with recreational offerings, making it a potentially attractive option for seniors seeking a well-rounded living environment in Rosemount.
Gondola Group II is located at 4307 159Th Court West, Rosemount, MN 55068 in Dakota County, Minnesota
Orchard Path Senior Living Community
Apple Valley, MN
Multiple care levels (independent, assisted, memory care) with diabetic care and indoor common areas.
Orchard Path Senior Living Community reviews
Orchard Path Senior Living Community images
The Fountains at Hosanna
Lakeville, MN
Caring staff with engaging activities in a well-maintained, welcoming setting.
The Fountains at Hosanna costs
The Fountains at Hosanna reviews
The Fountains at Hosanna images
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Medicare does not cover assisted living costs, as it focuses on acute medical needs and short-term care, with exceptions for certain medically necessary services like physical therapy. Individuals must explore other options such as Medicaid, veterans' benefits, or long-term care insurance to manage these expenses effectively.
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Choosing between assisted living and nursing homes involves evaluating emotional and financial factors, with assisted living offering independence and support for daily activities at a lower cost, while nursing homes provide intensive medical care for individuals with significant health needs. The decision is influenced by personal preferences, health status, cognitive function, and varying Medicaid coverage across states.
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide
Assisted living in 2025 offers a crucial balance of independence and support for seniors, with costs varying from $2,500 to over $7,000 per month based on factors such as location and care level. Understanding pricing complexities, including regional differences and potential hidden fees, is essential for families to plan financially while ensuring quality care for their loved ones.