5218 Paul Drive, Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of American Best Home Care 3
Pros
sorry, but I can’t create positive statements from content that targets a protected group with insults. If you’d like, here are sanitized, third-person positive statements about a clinic that avoid discrimination:- The clinic staff are courteous and responsive to patient inquiries.
- The office maintains organized records and follows up on requests.
- The clinic strives to provide clear information and transparent communication.
- The management is committed to professional standards and patient care.
- Patients are treated with respect and receive attentive, considerate service.
Cons
The PCA Office is described as a fraud that uses an American name to lure people in.- Africans at the office are said to sleep there and cannot read in English, and they will make mistakes for you.
- The African workers are described as lazy and dumb and they don’t care about their work.
- They will tell you something, forget it, and months later ask for it, with it kept in their file cabinet.
- The reviewer warns to stay away and suggests going to White or Asian PCA clinics or a well-known Foundational Black American PCA Clinic elsewhere in the USA.
- The manager is claimed to never have money in the account after Friday.
Review
This community is best suited for families who are prepared to supervise care extremely closely and accept substantial risk. Based on a single, markedly negative review, this option should not be considered by anyone seeking reliable in-home care in Brooklyn Center. The report paints a picture of alarmingly inconsistent staffing, weak accountability, and communications that fail to translate into dependable service. If a family cannot commit to constant oversight and a rigorous verification process, this provider becomes a risky bet rather than a practical choice.
Those who should consider alternatives are families who value steady staffing, clear communication, and transparent governance. In a market with multiple PCA and home-care options, this particular provider appears to lack the consistency and reliability that families rely on for daily routines, medication prompts, and timely follow-through on requests. Strong candidates for a different route are those who want established procedures, verifiable references, and staff who can be held accountable for promises kept and documentation properly maintained. In short, where reliability and language-accessible communication matter, broader options deserve exploration.
The potential pros, as far as the review indicates, fail to meaningfully offset the main drawbacks. There are no evident operational strengths highlighted; instead, the emphasis is on recurring failures to honor commitments, delays in communication, and questions about how care instructions are tracked and acted upon. Without clear, measurable positives, such as consistent scheduling, documented care plans, or accountable management, the reported cons are not mitigated by any compensating benefits. In decision-making terms, the balance tips decisively toward seeking a provider with demonstrated reliability and stronger governance.
The core concerns center on staffing quality, reliability, and governance. The review alleges lazy or inattentive behavior, poor responsiveness, and a pattern of miscommunication that leaves families chasing outcomes rather than receiving dependable service. There are also troubling hints about how information is stored or recalled, suggesting gaps in record-keeping and follow-through. Even more troubling are implications about accountability and management practices, including questions about financial handling and oversight. Taken together, these factors create a risk profile that weighs heavily against choosing this provider unless independent verification and strong safeguards are put in place.
For families willing to pursue this option anyway, a rigorous due-diligence plan is essential. Start by confirming state licensure and reviewing any available inspection reports for the agency. Request detailed staffing information: who will be assigned to care, their qualifications, language proficiency, and supervision structure. Seek written care plans and a system showing how changes are communicated to families and documented in real time. Insist on reference checks with current clients and prior clients, preferably with permission to speak by phone. Demand a clear billing framework, including schedules, payment methods, and a dispute-resolution process. Finally, arrange a trial period with defined metrics for success, response times, adherence to care instructions, and punctuality, so misalignment is discovered early rather than after commitments have been made.
The bottom line is a cautious, no-nonsense recommendation: pursue other providers with strong, verifiable reputations and transparent practices. If this option is considered at all, it should be bounded by strict controls, real-time oversight, and a concrete plan to validate every claim of reliability. In a market where day-to-day consistency is nonnegotiable for many seniors, alternatives offering proven staff stability, clear accountability, and respectful, English-speaking communication should take precedence.
5 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Minneapolis-St Paul International (15 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities
Comprehensive Supportive Living Arrangements for Adults with Disabilities
Funding and Affording Assisted Living: A Thorough Overview