6580 Livernois, Troy, MI 48098
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Lifestyles Group Home
Pros
The establishment is clean.- It is nice and quiet.
Cons
The establishment had bed bugs despite being described as clean.- The staff attempted to obtain guardianship of the relative.
- A worker was smoking weed when the reviewer arrived.
- There are numerous complaints and reports about staff providing care for residents at their homes.
- The staff forced the relative to work and took her checks.
- The owner Debbie does not take responsibility for her staff's actions.
- People are advised not to leave anyone they know in their care.
- The staff is very disrespectful.
- Time allotments were not available for all staff concerns.
- They beat the clients and mistreat them.
- They steal the clients' EBT money and use it for purchases near expiration.
- The owners are horrible; they just want money and hire bad people, firing those who truly care about the clients.
Review
This community is best suited for residents who are largely independent and require minimal hands-on care, and for families willing to tolerate serious safety and integrity concerns in exchange for a low-cost, quiet setting. In Troy, Lifestyles Group Home presents as a no-frills option where the ambiance may feel calm and the pace unobtrusive. However, the trade-off is steep: essential safeguards, reliable oversight, and consistent, respectful care appear to be inconsistent at best. For anyone who relies on regular supervision, medication management, or clear leadership when problems arise, this option proves inadequate. The bottom line is that only those who can live with significant risk and limited accountability should seriously consider it.
Families evaluating alternatives should note that this is not a strong candidate for loved ones requiring predictable, professional care. Those with serious medical needs, cognitive challenges, or behavioral issues will likely encounter gaps in staffing, response times, and care quality. Consider other communities with transparent leadership, documented caregiver training, and a proven track record of safeguarding residents’ finances and welfare. If independence is the priority and a highly controlled, low-cost environment is acceptable, this place may be on the periphery of feasible choices; otherwise, the search should move toward options with stronger governance and clearer care plans.
The positive aspects cited occasionally include a quiet, unobtrusive environment and basic day-to-day routines that can feel comfortable for some residents. Yet these modest benefits fail to offset the most significant concerns. The dominant reality in the reviews is a pattern of serious misconduct and mismanagement: bed bug issues, allegations of theft of residents’ checks, and claims of money misappropriation. When concerns surface, the responses from leadership and staff appear inconsistent or evasive, undermining trust. A calm atmosphere does not compensate for unsafe conditions or disrespectful treatment, especially when a loved one’s finances or safety may be at stake.
The most troubling themes center on safety and accountability. Allegations describe rigorous abuse, coercive behavior toward residents, and staff who are not held to appropriate standards. Reports claim staff members engage in illegal or inappropriate activities, and ownership is portrayed as unresponsive or dismissive in addressing problems. Such dynamics create an environment where residents may feel unsafe, and families lose confidence in the integrity of the operation. While a few reviews show redeeming or positive moments, the overall consensus emphasizes mistreatment, unreliable staffing, and leadership gaps that cast long shadows over any potential positives.
Prospective buyers should insist on rigorous due diligence before placement. Request recent inspection reports, licensing citations, and evidence of corrective actions. Ask specifically about bed bug history and pest control protocols, workforce stability, background checks, and ongoing staff training. Seek opportunities to speak with current residents’ families about their experiences, request a detailed care plan, and require transparent access to resident finances and payroll records. Insist on a clear, enforceable agreement regarding guardianship and the safeguarding of personal property to avoid repeating the most troubling patterns described in the reviews.
In the end, this community should be regarded as a last-resort option for families with constrained budgets and a willingness to accept substantial risk. For most seniors and their families, the trade-offs, serious safety concerns, allegations of misconduct, and questioned leadership, far outweigh any perceived cost advantage or quiet ambiance. Strongly consider alternatives that demonstrate consistent staffing, accountable management, transparent care practices, and a proven commitment to resident protection. The decision should prioritize safety, dignity, and clear lines of accountability over price or quiet surroundings.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration
Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview
Social Security Benefits and Assisted Living: Navigating Options Across the U.S.