628 E Main St, Sebewaing, MI 48759
To contact a resident: (989) 883-9902
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Medallion Village Costs & Pricing
Medallion Village offers competitive pricing for its accommodations compared to both Tuscola County and the broader Michigan market. For instance, a studio at Medallion Village is available for $1,500 per month, significantly lower than the average of $3,622 in Tuscola County and $3,824 statewide. Similarly, the one-bedroom option at Medallion Village is priced at $2,100, which again provides substantial savings compared to Tuscola County's average of $3,329 and Michigan's $3,384. Even for those seeking two-bedroom units, Medallion Village remains appealing at $2,400 per month - more affordable than the county average of $2,509 and considerably less than the state average of $3,523. This pricing structure highlights Medallion Village as a valuable choice for individuals and families looking for quality housing without overstretching their budgets.
| Floor plans | Medallion Village | Tuscola County | Michigan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $1,500 | $3,622 | $3,824 |
| 1 Bedroom | $2,100 | $3,329 | $3,384 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $2,400 | $2,509 | $3,523 |
Overall Review of Medallion Village
Pros
The staff member is very personable and easy to talk to.
He answered every question the reviewer had, including those the reviewer didnāt know to ask.
Tending to the dying is recognized as a blessing.
The reviewer, a hospice volunteer and chaplain for ten years, highlights the importance of compassionate care in hospice settings.
Cons
The reviewer was deeply disappointed by a staff memberās lack of compassion and tenderness in tending to their family member.
The staff memberās statements to the reviewer were hurtful and showed no tenderness.
The reviewer believes this staff member should never be employed to tend to anyone in assisted living, let alone Hospice care.
The reviewer felt compelled to address the staff memberās behavior to protect future residents.
The reviewer warned that living in the building attached to the assisted living would be for those willing to live with aggressive, violent, mentally ill individuals.
Review
Medallion Village in Sebewaing, Michigan is best suited for families seeking a modest, hometown assisted living option where proximity to loved ones and budget considerations take precedence over flawless, consistently delivered end-of-life care. The community appears workable for residents who can tolerate variability in staff attentiveness and who have strong family or external hospice oversight to fill gaps. It works best when care coordination is supplemented by an involved family that can monitor daily interactions and advocate for a dying loved one during sensitive stages. In short, this is not a place to rely on uniform exemplary bedside manners; it is a local, budget-conscious option where advocacy and oversight drive the experience more than institutional culture.
Those for whom consistent compassion, patient communication, and a serene environment with tightly managed behavior are essential should consider alternatives. The most decisive reason to look elsewhere is a pattern of reported lack of empathy from staff toward residents in their final weeks, including hurtful remarks. Families should also evaluate other facilities if safety and behavioral management are a top priority, given mentions of aggressive, mentally ill individuals in the building. If the priority is reliable, comforting end-of-life care delivered with tenderness, this community may fall short. In such cases, exploring nearby facilities with strong hospice partnerships and staff training could yield a more reliable experience.
On the positive side, there are signs that some staff members can be personable, accessible, and responsive. At least one employee was described as easy to talk to, answering questions thoroughly and proactively. That level of engagement matters when families need reassurance about daily routines, care plans, and the handling of sensitive moments. The presence of a staff member who demonstrates clear communication can offset some concerns, especially when families lack direct oversight. While not a guarantee, these instances show that capable, compassionate caregiving can exist within the community, suggesting that a well-managed shift or a stable caregiver team could improve the overall experience.
However, the dominant narrative across several reviews centers on a troubling lack of compassion. Reported episodes describe staff tending to a dying relative with cold comments and a perceived absence of tenderness during critical weeks. End-of-life care rests on empathy, patience, and emotional support; when caregivers fail to provide that baseline, the emotional and psychological toll on families surges. Such incidents are not simply discomforts but substantive risks to the residentās sense of dignity and comfort. The consistency of this concern, rather than occasional missteps, signals a cultural issue that neither a one-off staff member highlight nor a single tour can fully dispel. Prospective residents should weigh how much empathic care they can tolerate before choosing this community.
A separate, serious caveat is the claim that the building houses aggressive, mentally ill individuals, creating a potentially volatile environment. The mention of violence and challenging behavior raises legitimate safety concerns for residents, visitors, and staff. Without transparent reporting on staffing levels, training, de-escalation protocols, and room assignments, such a claim cannot be dismissed outright, and it demands careful due diligence. Families should request concrete information about how behavioral health needs are managed, what safeguards exist, and whether there is a plan for separating high-risk residents from others when needed. If safety and predictable daily life are non-negotiable, this factor alone may steer the decision toward stronger-structured communities with clear behavioral policies.
Decision-makers should approach Medallion Village with a concrete due-diligence plan: tour with a focus on how hospice and end-of-life care are actually delivered; request to meet the administrator and frontline caregivers; review care plans, supervision protocols, and incident reporting; probe staff turnover and training in compassion and de-escalation. If possible, speak with multiple families currently served to gauge consistency. Given the mixed signals, this community is best for those who can actively oversee care and tolerate variability, while being prepared to switch plans if the demonstrated empathy and safety do not meet expectations. For others, a short list of nearby alternatives with stronger hospice alignment and tighter safety controls is advisable.





A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities
Comprehensive Supportive Living Arrangements for Adults with Disabilities