21504 Parker, Farmington Hills, MI 48336
To contact a resident: (248) 469-7111
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Golden Age Costs & Pricing
Golden Age offers a semi-private room at a monthly cost of $3,000, positioning itself slightly above the average for Wayne County, which is $2,860, yet remains competitive compared to the broader Michigan state average of $3,191. This pricing structure reflects Golden Age's commitment to providing quality care and amenities that appeal to residents seeking a supportive environment. While it may be priced higher than some local alternatives, the unique services and community atmosphere offered at Golden Age may justify this cost for families looking for comprehensive care options in a nurturing setting.
| Floor plans | Golden Age | Wayne County | Michigan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,000 | $2,860 | $3,189 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Hutcheson Manor
$3,000 to $4,500 / month1.4 miles away -
from +$200 / mo
Vicky's Place
$3,200 to $6,000 / month4.9 miles away -
from +$495 / mo
Christman Adult Foster Care Home
$3,495 to $6,395 / month11.3 miles away -
from +$500 / mo
Briar Hill Assisted Living
$3,500 to $4,500 / month2.4 miles away -
About the same
Butternut Hill Senior Living
$3,000 to $4,000 / month12.0 miles away
Overall Review of Golden Age
Pros
It sounded wonderful.- The care home is a clean, small facility.
Review
Golden Age in Farmington Hills is best suited for seniors who want a quiet, home-like environment with highly individualized attention. With a tiny footprint, just four residents, the community can deliver a level of personalized care and familiarity that larger facilities struggle to match. Families prioritizing cleanliness and a non-institutional feel will find the setting appealing, especially if a gentle, predictable daily rhythm is important to their loved one.
Those who should consider alternatives are mainly those who require robust medical oversight or extensive specialized programming. The limited size and the fact that the operation has been in business only about six months suggest fewer on-site nursing resources, a narrower range of therapies, and fewer organized activities than typical larger assisted living communities. For seniors who need frequent medical attention, complex wound care, or dementia-specific programming, another option with deeper medical support and a fuller activities calendar may be a wiser choice.
Pros center on the strength of intimacy and cleanliness. The small, clean residence makes care highly visible and easier to monitor, which often translates into quicker recognition of changes in condition and more consistent routines. A highly personal touch is plausible when staff know residents well, allowing for tailored assistance and a sense of belonging that larger homes sometimes struggle to provide. Early feedback hints at a warm welcome and a favorable first impression of quality, suggesting a foundation upon which dependable, relationship-driven care can grow.
Yet the same small scale and startup status imply notable cons. With only four residents, programming is naturally more limited, and the on-site staff capacity for activities, socialization opportunities, and rehabilitative services may be insufficient for residents who crave a bustling calendar. Staffing redundancy is likely less robust, which can affect responsiveness during busy periods or staff absences. The in-progress nature of a six-month-old business also raises questions about long-term consistency, policy maturity, and the breadth of amenities that can be reliably offered as needs evolve.
When evaluating, practical diligence matters most. Prospective families should request detailed information about daily schedules, activity options, meal plans, and the exact level of nursing or aide support available on-site. Clarify how medications are managed, what safety measures exist, and how emergencies are handled. Visiting at different times can reveal how meals, care routines, and supervision unfold in practice. If the goal is to preserve independence with minimal daily help within a calm environment, Golden Age can be a very good match; if mobility, memory care, or frequent medical oversight are priorities, a larger setting with more extensive on-site resources may be a better fit.
Bottom line: Golden Age is a sensible choice for families seeking a homey, low-key setting where a small, intimate team can deliver attentive, individualized care. The upside, cleanliness, a calm vibe, and the potential for deep personal connections, offsets some gaps in programming and medical capacity for residents who thrive in a simpler, slower-paced environment. However, the trade-offs are real: limited services, fewer on-site clinicians, and a shorter track record mean this community may fall short for those with higher medical needs or a craving for a full calendar of activities. In decisions, weight the importance of personal attention and a non-institutional setting against the necessity for broader medical support and richer programming, and explore alternatives if the latter dominates the care equation.
Board and Care Home
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Activities off-site
Beautician on-site
Devotional services off-site
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Respite or short term stays offered
Wheelchair accessible showers
Detroit Metropolitan-Wayne County (16 miles away)
Ambulatory care
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Meals provided
Skilled Nursing Facilities vs. Nursing Homes: Making Sense of the Differences
A Detailed Examination of Nursing Home Costs Across the U.S.
Exploring Nonmedical Home Care: Understanding Services, Costs, and Financial Approaches