3708 Warner Avenue, Hyattsville, MD 20784
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Springtime Home I Costs & Pricing
Springtime Home I offers competitive pricing for its accommodations compared to the broader market in Prince George's County and the state of Maryland. For semi-private rooms, Springtime Home I charges $2,800 per month, which is notably lower than the county average of $3,058 and significantly below the state average of $3,545. The studio options at Springtime are priced at $3,500, again offering a more affordable alternative when contrasted with the county rate of $4,428 and the state figure of $4,656. Similarly, private rooms at this facility are available for $3,500 monthly, which is less than both the county's average of $3,792 and Maryland's average of $4,112. Overall, Springtime Home I presents a compelling value proposition for residents seeking quality care without compromising their financial resources.
| Floor plans | Springtime Home I | Prince George's County | Maryland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,800 | $3,058 | $3,545 |
| Studio | $3,500 | $4,428 | $4,656 |
| Private | $3,500 | $3,792 | $4,112 |
Overall Review of Springtime Home I
Pros
The staff provide great care and professional leadership.- The home’s curb appeal is nice.
- The facility is clean and well maintained.
- Residents are provided with three meals per day.
- There are on-site caregivers with a doctor and nurse on call.
Cons
There was no vacancy when they arrived for the tour.- The onsite caregiver did not expect them for the tour.
- Inside, a room was found cluttered, later explained to be the storage/laundry room.
- The stairwell was very narrow and steep, raising safety concerns even with a chair lift installed.
- There was no sitting area out front on the patio (only a back patio).
- There were no planned outings for residents, with families responsible for taking members out.
- The second-floor common area was rather dark, with less natural light than the bedrooms.
- They were only able to see the outside.
Review
This community is best suited for seniors who want a home-style assisted living with hands-on, professional caregiving and predictable routines, and who can tolerate a two-story layout with gender-separated floors and modest on-site programming. The setting emphasizes steady, attentive care, two caregivers on site with medical oversight available (a doctor and nurse on call), three meals daily, and private or semi-private rooms, creating a calm, residential atmosphere rather than a bustling campus. For families seeking a quieter, more intimate environment where staff oversight is the centerpiece, this can be a strong match. Prospective residents should accept that admission can hinge on current vacancy, which can frustrate those aiming for immediate transition.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are clear: residents who require barrier-free, single-story living with open access in common areas and a fuller calendar of organized activities may find this community too quiet or limiting. Families prioritizing abundant social opportunities, regular off-site outings, or a front-porch, sunlit gathering space will likely prefer a campus with more expansive programming. Similarly, those who demand a more transparent, consistently staffed admission process should evaluate other options that publicly emphasize ongoing vacancy status and a more fluid intake. In short, this is a practical fit for caregivers who value stability over constant stimulation.
The strongest positives consistently highlighted are care quality and leadership. The staff is described as professional and attentive, with a clear emphasis on safeguarding residents’ well-being. The home-like feel, clean environments, meals provided, and flexible room options, supports daily life without the clinical stiffness of larger facilities. The presence of two caregivers on site, along with medical support available on call, helps ensure monitoring and timely responses to needs. Residents can receive mail and have access to private or shared spaces, which adds a familiar, at-home rhythm to daily routines.
Yet the drawbacks are real and should influence the decision. Admissions can be blocked by lack of vacancy, which makes timing unpredictable for families hoping to coordinate moves. The physical layout includes a two-story design with gender-separated floors, a very narrow, steep stairwell with a chair lift, and a back patio but no inviting front seating area, which can limit mobility and social interaction. The second-floor common area is noted as darker, and there is little in the way of planned outings; families are often responsible for arranging trips outside the facility. A cluttered storage/laundry room observed during a tour may raise concerns about overall housekeeping discipline if not routinely addressed.
These pros and cons interact in meaningful ways. The reliable care and leadership can offset some physical and social limitations, providing a secure environment where residents are monitored and meals are consistent. That safety net becomes particularly valuable for individuals who prioritize medical oversight and a peace-of-mind presence from staff. However, the layout constraints, stairs, limited daylight in common areas, and sparse programmed activities, can dampen quality of life for residents who prize easy access across levels, regular social events, or a more open, sunlit gathering space. The home-like atmosphere and structured routines help, but they do not fully compensate for limited mobility access and the absence of a lively activity calendar.
For families evaluating this community, a focused due-diligence plan is essential. Request a current walk-through to see how the two-story design is navigated by residents with varying mobility; confirm that a stair-lift is functioning and assess whether it suits anticipated needs. Ask about the latest occupancy status and expected wait times so scheduling aligns with the desired move date. Inquire about the front-porch or outdoor seating situation and the lighting of the second-floor common area. Probe the activity calendar and outing policy, whether there are guest-led events, volunteer programs, or regular excursions, and determine if staff can facilitate social engagement beyond meals. Finally, compare neighboring options with single-story layouts, higher activity programming, and clearer admission timelines to determine which fit is truly optimal for the member’s independence, social needs, and tolerance for daily structure.
Bottom line: Springtime Home I offers a solid, caregiver-led environment with dependable medical oversight, clean facilities, and predictable meals, an appealing package for seniors who prioritize safety, quiet living, and a home-like atmosphere. The decision hinges on mobility and lifestyle preferences. If a barrier-free, activity-rich setting with extensive social programming is non-negotiable, alternatives should be explored. If a calm, intimate senior living experience with steady care and a manageable, low-stress routine feels right, this community can be a good fit, provided candid discussions about vacancy, accessibility, and outing options are part of the admission process.
7 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Ronald Reagan Washington National (10 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Christian services
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Safeguarding Your Memory Through the Golden Years: Eight Ways to Preserve Cognitive Health
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
