1224 Cathedral Drive, Glen Burnie, MD 21061
To contact a resident: (410) 768-1215
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
A & E Homecare II Costs & Pricing
A & E Homecare II offers competitive pricing for its services, particularly when compared to the broader market in Anne Arundel County and the state of Maryland. For a semi-private room, residents at A & E Homecare II can expect to pay $1,800 per month, which is significantly lower than the county average of $4,109 and the statewide average of $3,545. Similarly, the cost for a private room at A & E Homecare II is set at $2,500 monthly, making it more affordable compared to both the county's average of $4,162 and Maryland's average of $4,112. This pricing structure not only highlights A & E Homecare II's commitment to providing quality care but also underscores their ability to offer value in an increasingly costly market.
| Floor plans | A & E Homecare II | Anne Arundel County | Maryland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,800 | $4,109 | $3,545 |
| Private | $2,500 | $4,162 | $4,112 |
Overall Review of A & E Homecare II
Cons
The place is very small and not well maintained.- They would not put their mother in a place like this.
- The staff member was not very knowledgeable about her business.
- The staff member yelled at the visitor.
Review
A & E Homecare II in Glen Burnie is best suited for seniors who can tolerate a very small, no-frills living environment and a tight budget, with the expectation that on-site attention from staff may be inconsistent. The community will feel approachable to families that are capable of coordinating external care and performing hands-on oversight, since the reviews suggest limited proactive management and a lack of dependable, professional warmth from staff. In short, the facility is not a fit for those seeking a robust care team, predictable maintenance, or a polished welcome experience.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are families that prioritize cleanliness, well-maintained facilities, and confident, knowledgeable staff. If a resident requires reliable, on-site assistance, clear communication, and a welcoming first impression, larger or more established communities nearby will typically deliver more predictable service and a stronger care framework. For anyone evaluating options in Glen Burnie, the contrast between a very small, basic setting and a more comprehensive, professionally run operation should be a central part of the decision.
The main pros, if any, do not meaningfully offset the significant drawbacks evident in the reports. A smaller footprint can translate into a simpler, quieter capstone for some, but that potential upside is overwhelmed by concerns about maintenance, presentation, and staff competency. The few favorable assumptions about price or intimacy are outweighed by the reality that upkeep appears deficient and staff performance and knowledge seem inconsistent. In a decision-driven search, cost savings cannot compensate for a lack of reliable care leadership and a respectful, well-maintained environment.
Evidence from the accounts highlights a troubling first impression and ongoing reliability issues. One visitor encountered a hostile door greeting, followed by a retreat and a final message implying the possibility of a tour later, which underscores a dismissive, unwelcoming tone. Additional feedback paints the facility as very small and not well maintained, eroding confidence that the space is safe, comfortable, or dignified for daily living. The general sense is that staff knowledge and professionalism fall short, leaving families uncertain about whether residents would receive appropriate supervision or responsive problem-solving when needs arise.
From a practical standpoint, families considering this community should prioritize a structured due diligence process. Before deciding, request a guided tour during typical hours, not just a quick walk-through, and observe interactions between staff and residents. Ask pointed questions about maintenance schedules, housekeeping standards, and how maintenance requests are triaged and resolved. Probe staff qualifications, training, and turnover, as well as the existence of a formal care plan process, medication management, and emergency procedures. Speak with current residents or families about consistency of care, responsiveness, and the overall living environment. Insurance, licensing compliance, and accessibility features should be verified in writing for peace of mind.
The decisive takeaway is clear: for most families, the negatives documented, poor maintenance, limited staff reliability, and a tepid reception, outweigh any potential cost advantages. If the goal is predictable, respectful care in a clean, well-run setting, other Glen Burnie options are advisable. Only under tight budget constraints and with a plan to supervise every aspect of care would this community be reasonable to consider; even then, demand concrete commitments on maintenance, staffing, and resident engagement before committing.
5 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Activities off-site
Bath tubs
Beautician on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Baltimore-Washington International (3 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Affordable pricing with comprehensive care and on-site amenities.
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide
How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs