Bradford House Apt.

Pros

• Quiet, clean and safe.
• Armed security 24/7.
• The rental office is a pleasure to deal with, very friendly and professional.
• Big changes. They're totally remodeling.

Cons

• The place is not well kept.
• The complex is described as the worst apartment complex known to man.
• There are dangerous fire hazards all over the building.
• Doors do not work, preventing residents from entering or exiting.
• The elevator rarely works, which is dangerous for injured or elderly residents.
• The building is disgustingly dirty.
• Bed bugs and rotten smells pervade the building.
• The property is run by a slumlord who should be arrested for elder abuse.
• Pest control has been cut or replaced to save expenses, leaving bug issues unresolved.
• HUD vouchers are not provided.

Review

The complex has lately been the subject of two very different portraits. On one side, a visitor or resident writes with unbridled optimism about sweeping changes underway: "Big changes. They're totally remodeling and have thrown out 99% of the problem tenants. Quiet, clean and safe. Armed security 24/7. Rental office is a pleasure to deal with, very friendly and professional. Love it here!" In this view, the overhaul appears to have transformed the place into something orderly and welcoming, with a security presence that promises safety and a management team that makes the rental office a pleasant, professional touchpoint. The message is emphatic: the remodel marks a new era, and the sentiment is glowing.

But a much grimmer counter-narrative quickly follows, painting the opposite picture. Several reviewers insist the property is not well kept at all. One plainly states, "The place is not well kept!" with a terse exasperation that seems to reflect ongoing neglect despite any outward improvements. Another reviewer presses the point with urgency, labeling the situation as "the worst apartment complex known to man," accusing it of being dangerous and full of fire hazards, with doors that do not work and blocks of entry and exit compromised. The tone shifts from skeptical to alarmed as safety becomes a central concern, suggesting that basic infrastructure - doors, access points, and overall safety - is failing residents and visitors alike.

Safety and accessibility loom large in these accounts. Fire hazards are singled out as a persistent problem, and the complaints extend to doors that won't function, leaving residents who depend on reliable entryways in a precarious position. The elevator, a critical lifeline for many, is described as only intermittently operational. Given that the building's residents include many who are injured or elderly, the unreliability of the elevator and other safety features is framed not just as an inconvenience but as a potentially dangerous situation. The word choices reflect a deep concern that the physical plant's deficiencies intersect with the health and security of vulnerable residents.

Another set of criticisms centers on cleanliness and pest control. Reviews describe the property as "disgustingly dirty," with specific references to bed bugs and rotten smells permeating the building. One account mentions a close family member who is disabled and must contend with bed bugs in the living environment, portraying the issue as not merely a nuisance but a struggle that affects daily life and dignity. The recurring insect problem is attributed to inconsistent management practices, with a sense that pest control solutions are not only inadequate but repeatedly altered or cut back in an effort to save expenses. In this narrative, the cycle of pest problems - pest control plans put in place and then rescinded or replaced - becomes a persistent and frustrating theme.

Management turnover and accountability also come under scrutiny. Reviewers describe frequent changes in staff and a sense that entrusted teams aren't staying long enough to implement lasting improvements. The suggestion is that the property's leadership has never quite stabilized long enough to "get ahead" of the problems, particularly the ongoing pest issues. The arrival of a new pest control company is presented as a symptom of this instability - another reset rather than a resolution - leaving residents to start from scratch in addressing a problem that has persisted for years.

Finally, a practical and emotional strain colors the final note: frustration with moving processes and housing assistance. One reviewer alludes to trouble obtaining or leveraging a HUD voucher, describing it as "terrible" to navigate during a move. The implication is that even when residents are trying to relocate or secure housing assistance, bureaucratic or administrative hurdles compound the stress of living in a complex that many feel is plagued by systemic issues. Taken together, these accounts sketch a complex portrait of a property whose outward improvements are at odds with recurring, deeply felt concerns about safety, cleanliness, maintenance, and resident well-being.

In sum, the property appears to be at a crossroads. On the one hand, there are commendable signs of change: remodeling, a visible security presence, and a management office that engages with tenants in a friendly, professional manner. On the other hand, a chorus of persistent complaints paints a starkly different reality: dangerous safety lapses, unreliable access and infrastructure, pervasive pest problems, and a management history that seems unable to sustain long-term, effective solutions. For anyone evaluating the place, the stories highlight a need for a thorough, current assessment - checking the state of doors and elevators, verifying ongoing maintenance and pest control plans, speaking with current residents about day-to-day living, and clarifying how management plans to ensure consistent safety, cleanliness, and support for residents, especially the elderly and disabled. The truth, as it unfolds for potential tenants, likely lies somewhere between these two starkly different portrayals, and careful, evidence-based due diligence will be essential.

Pharmacies

• Clayton's Pharmacy (0.2 miles)
• Epic Pharmacies (0.2 miles)
• Craig's Drug Store (0.3 miles)
• Craig's Institutional Pharmacy (0.6 miles)
• Walgreens (0.8 miles)
• Rite Aid (1.1 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (1.4 miles)

Restaurants

• Thaitalian Infusion Cuisine (0.2 miles)
• Bombay Social (0.2 miles)
• Don Chuy Taqueria (0.3 miles)
• The Creek Deli (0.4 miles)
• Southern Grill (0.4 miles)
• Jimmie & Sooks (0.4 miles)
• Ava's Pizzeria & Wine Bar (0.4 miles)

Physicians

• Fassett-Magee Health Center (0.3 miles)
• Cambridge Family Eye Care, parts of MyEyeDr (0.3 miles)
• Maryland Healthy Weighs (0.4 miles)
• Rose Hill Family Physicians (0.6 miles)
• Dr Lois Narr (0.6 miles)
• Community Behavorial Health (0.7 miles)
• Morris Z Effron (0.8 miles)

Cafes

• Black Water Bakery (0.3 miles)
• Starbucks (0.8 miles)
• Rise Up Coffee (3 miles)

Places of Worship

• New Life Christian Church And Ministries (0.4 miles)
• Wheatley George Pastor & Joyce (0.4 miles)
• Christ Episcopal Church (0.5 miles)
• Living By Truth Ministries (0.7 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (0.9 miles)
• Faith Baptist Fellowship SBC (2.9 miles)
• Full Gospel Church Of God (12.5 miles)

Hospitals

• Shore Health System (0.6 miles)
• Dorchester General Hospital (0.7 miles)
• Shore Health System (0.7 miles)
• UM Shore Medical Center at Dorchester (0.8 miles)
• Eastern Shore Hospital Center (1.8 miles)
• The Pines (13.4 miles)
• Shore Regional Cancer Center (13.8 miles)

Transportation

• U-Haul Neighborhood Dealer (0.7 miles)

Parks

• Long Wharf Park (0.8 miles)
• Great Marsh Park (1.3 miles)
• Christ Rock Park (2 miles)
• Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge (8.6 miles)
• Oxford Town Park (9.9 miles)
• Stoney Ridge Park (12.6 miles)
• Idlewild Park (13.7 miles)