Walker Mews

Pros

• Residents feel safe and the staff is very helpful.
• The manager is very helpful.
• This place has a nice manager.
• The building is quiet, clean, and free of rodents.
• It is close to transportation and shopping.
• The lobby is nice.
• Free water is provided.
• Rent is income-based.
• Residents love the environment.
• The building is maintained nicely.

Cons

• The apartments are old and outdated.
• Roaches are abundant in the building.
• The water stays warm for only 5?7 minutes.
• Maintenance is not promptly addressed unless pressed or it's a safety hazard.
• Privacy is lacking; residents feel others are in their business, talk about them, or even take photos from windows.
• The north side of the building is loud, with constant talking and activity in the lobby.
• The property manager is described as nasty, unpleasant, and unprofessional, and not approachable.
• There is significant water damage, mold, and bedbugs in the building.

Review

Walker Mews Apartments presents a terrain of mixed experiences as described by residents who've lived there. Across the notes, some tenants emphasize a sense of safety and helpful staff, with several pointing to the manager as particularly accommodating. Yet this positive thread runs alongside a wide range of complaints about upkeep, privacy, and the overall condition of the building. The result is a portrait of a property that can feel like different places depending on which unit, floor, or day you happen to observe.

On the positive side, a few reviewers highlight practical perks that stand out in their day-to-day living. Water is described as free, and the property offers income-based housing, which are cited as meaningful benefits for some residents. Several reviewers also mention that the staff and particularly the manager can be very helpful, contributing to a sense of safety and support when issues arise. In a few accounts, residents mention pleasant encounters with the front desk or management and describe a generally cooperative attitude when problems are raised.

But the favorable notes are often counterbalanced by a long list of substantial concerns. Many residents describe the apartments as old and out of date, with aging infrastructure that shows wear in various ways. Pipes are said to knock daily, baseboards split or come loose, and water damage appears in walls in places. Mold is mentioned by some, and there are even claims of bed bugs, though at least one reviewer notes that bed bugs were not present in their unit. Old appliances that defrost food unexpectedly and unreliable hot water that only stays warm for a short window add to the sense of dated, temperamental systems undermining daily comfort.

Maintenance and responsiveness emerge as a recurrent point of friction. A common theme is that repairs are slow or contingent on persistent prompting, with some reviewers saying nothing gets fixed unless you "hound" them or unless the issue presents a safety hazard. This pattern feeds a broader sense of frustration with how problems are prioritized and resolved, and it is closely tied to the general perception of the building's condition. In addition, clogged trash chutes, carpet that needs cleaning, and other upkeep tasks are cited as ongoing nuisances that affect the overall living environment.

Noise, privacy, and resident interactions add another layer of complexity to the experience. On the north side of the building, noise is described as intrusive - people talking in the lobby and in hallways, making it hard to relax or sleep. Privacy feels limited, with residents allegedly looking in on others or taking pictures from windows; some reviewers recount uneasy or uncomfortable social dynamics, including being spoken to inways that feel intrusive or disrespectful. There are reports of confrontations or uncomfortable encounters in common areas, such as hallway interactions with other residents and personal questions posed by strangers.

Community dynamics present a mixed bag as well. Some reviewers describe rude or unresponsive neighbors who fail to acknowledge residents who greet them. Others recount that there are friendly, longstanding residents - one person mentions meeting a nice guy who has lived there for 15 years - and there are moments of neighborly support, such as people who engage in conversation or offer assistance. The range of experiences includes both negative and positive social interactions, with some residents feeling exposed or watched by others and others feeling more at ease and connected.

The management and customer service thread is notably varied. A number of reviews fault the property manager for a nasty, unprofessional, or unapproachable demeanor, arguing that corporate leadership should re-evaluate her fit for the role. Conversely, other accounts describe a competent or even pleasant manager who helps residents navigate issues and provides a sense of reassurance. The front desk and corporate communications are also cited as problematic by some, with reports of poor customer service and a lack of respect in conversations with staff. This inconsistency contributes to a perception that service quality depends heavily on who you interact with and when.

Finally, there are glimpses of a more favorable baseline in certain reviews. One account describes a building that is quiet, clean, and free of rodents, with a good environment, proximity to transportation and shopping, and a sense of safety stemming from maintained grounds and facilities. In these threads, the property is portrayed as livable and sometimes even pleasant, especially when compared with other experiences described by neighboring residents. Yet even within these relatively positive frames, there are caveats about aging infrastructure or occasional discomfort that remind readers that the experience is not uniformly positive.

Taken together, the collection of reviews paints Walker Mews Apartments as a place with some redeeming features and practical advantages - such as safety, helpful staff in some instances, and income-based housing - while also carrying a heavy burden of maintenance frustrations, aging infrastructure, privacy concerns, and inconsistent management behavior. For prospective residents, the landscape suggests a need to weigh the value of conveniences and location against the reality of upkeep challenges and the variability of resident interactions and service quality. A visit to observe the building, talk to current residents, and gauge the day-to-day atmosphere on different floors and times could help form a more grounded impression of what living there might feel like.

This part of Baltimore, Maryland offers a convenient and diverse range of amenities for senior living. With several pharmacies within close proximity, access to medication and healthcare services is readily available. Additionally, there are various dining options including seafood, cafes, and fast food chains for a variety of meal choices. The neighborhood also boasts several parks for leisurely outdoor activities and places of worship for spiritual fulfillment. For medical needs, there are reputable physicians and hospitals nearby, ensuring quality healthcare services. The area also offers entertainment options such as theaters for leisure activities. Public transportation is easily accessible with light rail stations and train stations within a few miles, providing ease of mobility throughout the city.

Pharmacies

• Rite Aid (0.1 miles)
• Walgreens (0.2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.2 miles)
• Walgreens (2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.1 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.3 miles)
• Walgreens (2.8 miles)

Restaurants

• Zen West Roadside Cantina (0.3 miles)
• Colin's Seafood and Grill (1.4 miles)
• Subway (1.6 miles)
• McDonald's (2 miles)
• Burger King (2.1 miles)
• Pepe's (2.2 miles)
• Mt. Washington Tavern (2.3 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (0.4 miles)
• Miss Shirley's Cafe, Roland Park (2.1 miles)
• Dooby's (4.9 miles)
• Ceremony Coffee Roasters (5.1 miles)
• Panera Bread (5.1 miles)

Parks

• Rodgers Forge Tot Lot (0.7 miles)
• Lake Roland (2.2 miles)
• Cromwell Valley Park (4 miles)
• Meadowood Regional Park (4.6 miles)

Places of Worship

• Brown Memorial Woodbrook Presbyterian Church (1.2 miles)
• Church of the Immaculate Conception (2.4 miles)
• Church of the Nativity (4.4 miles)

Physicians

• O'Dea Building- St Josephs Hospital (1.3 miles)
• Greater Baltimore Medical Center (1.7 miles)
• Clinical Associates (2.3 miles)
• Scottish Rite Speech & Language Center (2.4 miles)
• Dr Richard A. Adler, Belcara Health Ophthalmology (2.5 miles)
• Pediatric Partners (2.5 miles)
• Advanced Allergy & Asthma Center (3.4 miles)

Hospitals

• MedStar Good Samaritan Hospital (1.4 miles)
• Sheppard Pratt Health System (1.6 miles)
• GBMC (1.7 miles)
• MedStar Union Memorial Hospital (2.8 miles)
• Sinai Hospital Of Baltimore (3 miles)
• Lifebridge Health Campus Service (4.5 miles)
• Johns Hopkins Medicine at Green Spring Station (4.8 miles)

Theaters

• Cinemark Towson And Xd (2.2 miles)

Transportation

• Lutherville Light Rail Station (4.2 miles)
• Penn Station (4.3 miles)