Five Star Residences of Lafayette Costs & Pricing
Five Star Residences of Lafayette offers competitive pricing for various room types, making it an appealing choice for potential residents. For a studio, the monthly cost is $2,235, significantly lower than the average rates in Tippecanoe County ($3,197) and statewide in Indiana ($3,258). Residents seeking a one-bedroom unit will find Five Star's rate of $2,630 to be more affordable compared to both county ($3,515) and state averages ($3,300). Interestingly, for those looking for two-bedroom accommodations, Five Star's price of $2,880 is higher than the county's average ($1,722), but still presents a compelling option when compared to the state average of $3,208. Overall, Five Star Residences of Lafayette stands out as a cost-effective alternative within the local market while offering quality living options.
| Floor plans | Five Star Residences of Lafayette | Tippecanoe County | Indiana |
|---|
| Studio | $2,235 | $3,197 | $3,258 |
| 1 Bedroom | $2,630 | $3,515 | $3,300 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $2,880 | $1,722 | $3,208 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$85 / mo
Westminster Village
$2,150 to $3,090 / month
4.6 miles away
-
About the same
Digby Place
$2,220 to $3,465 / month
4.2 miles away
-
from +$135 / mo
Aster Place
$2,370 to $2,780 / month
1.3 miles away
-
from -$435 / mo
Cumberland Pointe Health Campus
$1,800 to $4,410 / month
4.6 miles away
-
from +$437 / mo
University Place, a CCRC
$2,672 to $3,380 / month
5.0 miles away
Overall Review of Five Star Residences of Lafayette
caveat
8 reviews mention this
Staff responsiveness is mixed
Residents and families describe care support that can be slow or incomplete at times.
Some families say they had to repeatedly request help or follow up for items like broken appliances, room cleanliness, and medication-related coordination. Others mention having difficulty getting timely assistance, including comments about limited medical personnel. There are also a few sharper accounts involving safety checks and communication about care needs. On the positive side, several residents and families do describe staff as quick to respond and easy to reach, but the reviews overall show a noticeable variation in consistency.
common
14 reviews mention this
Clean, bright facility wins praise
Many reviewers emphasize a clean, bright environment inside the building.
A recurring theme is that the facility looks and feels well maintained, with bright common areas and residents noticing there isn’t noticeable odor in the halls. Several reviews also mention that rooms are kept tidy and that housekeeping supports day-to-day comfort. A smaller set of reviews, however, describe problems with room cleanliness or odors that required additional attention. Overall, cleanliness is a frequent point of approval, with occasional breakdowns called out directly.
common
18 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
The activity calendar is a frequent reason families and residents recommend the community.
Reviews often highlight scheduled programming, resident socializing, and regular events like games and outings. Residents mention being busy with activities and enjoying things like arts and crafts, yoga/chair yoga, and live entertainment. Families also describe the community as having a full calendar with day trips and performances. While most reviews praise the variety, a few note limited activity availability or the need for more dementia-focused options.
common
17 reviews mention this
Dining quality is frequently praised
Dining is one of the most commonly mentioned strengths in reviews.
Many reviewers describe the food as good, enjoying meals prepared by a chef or served daily, and some mention specific dietary needs being handled. Several also talk about the dining room itself as a pleasant place to gather, and a few say room for improvement exists in menu variety or how many gluten-free items are available. A handful of reviews focus on dining as an area that didn’t meet expectations. Taken together, dining tends to be seen as a positive experience, with some specific gaps noted.
caveat
4 reviews mention this
Medicaid acceptance is a limitation
Medicaid not being accepted is a sticking point for some families.
At least a few reviewers say the community does not take Medicaid, which affected their options and future planning. Other reviews describe working around payment constraints or using other support such as VA benefits. The overall takeaway from reviews is that eligibility and affordability planning may be important before committing. This limitation shows up as a clear reason some families chose differently.
common
6 reviews mention this
Pricing is often described as affordable
Multiple reviewers describe the cost as a key factor in choosing this community.
Several families say they selected the community because it fit their budget, and one review specifically calls it an affordable option. Others mention that the price helped drive the decision even when evaluating other alternatives. Still, there are also concerns where residents felt they were paying for limited care, or where families questioned whether the pricing matched the level of support delivered. The reviews suggest value matters most to decision-makers, but experiences can vary depending on care needs and follow-through.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.